A cooperative Global South? Brazil, India, and China in multilateral regimes
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10451/24816 |
Resumo: | Differently from the Cold War, emerging powers currently have chances to put forward their foreign policy goals. In their rise, countries such as Brazil, India, and China opted to follow similar sets of strategies within multilateral regimes. Ranging from blocking and free riding to cooperative behaviors, these states have enhanced their ability to promote topical changes in existing institutional settings. It does not mean, however, that their developing condition will necessarily prompt them to cooperate. As this paper will point out by means of a comparative analysis of the regimes of nuclear non-proliferation, peace and security, and climate change, these countries have more chances to cooperate when their interpretations of the principles and norms that compose a regime converge. Relying on how a country interprets normative frameworks and on the degree of membership a state has in a regime, this article challenges the notion that these three leaders of the so-called Global South would be relying on an all-encompassing cooperative multilateral behavior. |
id |
RCAP_0b9aaae059490bb5a3e06e2f0ea3b2fa |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/24816 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
A cooperative Global South? Brazil, India, and China in multilateral regimesMultilateralismRegimesBrasilDifferently from the Cold War, emerging powers currently have chances to put forward their foreign policy goals. In their rise, countries such as Brazil, India, and China opted to follow similar sets of strategies within multilateral regimes. Ranging from blocking and free riding to cooperative behaviors, these states have enhanced their ability to promote topical changes in existing institutional settings. It does not mean, however, that their developing condition will necessarily prompt them to cooperate. As this paper will point out by means of a comparative analysis of the regimes of nuclear non-proliferation, peace and security, and climate change, these countries have more chances to cooperate when their interpretations of the principles and norms that compose a regime converge. Relying on how a country interprets normative frameworks and on the degree of membership a state has in a regime, this article challenges the notion that these three leaders of the so-called Global South would be relying on an all-encompassing cooperative multilateral behavior.Diferente da Guerra Fria, as atuais potências emergentes têm maiores condições de levarem adiante suas preferências de política externa. Em sua ascensão, países como Brasil, Índia e China optaram por seguir estratégias semelhantes em regimes multilaterais. Variando de bloqueio e free-riding a comportamentos cooperativos, tais estados expandiram suas capacidades de promover mudanças tópicas em arranjos institucionais existentes. Isso não significa, entretanto, que sua condição emergente vá necessariamente levá-los a cooperar. Como este artigo demonstrará, por meio de análise comparativa dos regimes de não proliferação nuclear, paz e segurança, e mudança do clima, esses países têm mais chances de cooperar quando suas interpretações dos princípios e normas que compõem um regime convergem. Baseando-se em como um país interpreta arcabouços normativos e no tipo de filiação que um estado tem um regime, este trabalho contesta a noção que esses três líderes do suposto Sul Global estariam alicerçados em um amplo comportamento multilateral cooperativo.This research has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 607133. The author is part of the Marie Curie Initial Training Network PRIMO – Power and Region in a Multipolar Order.Editoria Carta Internacional - Associação Brasileira de Relações Internacionais (ABRI)Repositório da Universidade de LisboaLeal Ribeiro De Albuquerque, Felipe2016-10-11T13:55:23Z20162016-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/24816engAlbuquerque, F. L. R. de (2016). A cooperative Global South? Brazil, India, and China in multilateral regimes. Revista Carta Internacional, 11 (1), 163-1871413-090410.21530/ci.v11n1.2016.350info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-08T16:14:00Zoai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/24816Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:41:52.385961Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A cooperative Global South? Brazil, India, and China in multilateral regimes |
title |
A cooperative Global South? Brazil, India, and China in multilateral regimes |
spellingShingle |
A cooperative Global South? Brazil, India, and China in multilateral regimes Leal Ribeiro De Albuquerque, Felipe Multilateralism Regimes Brasil |
title_short |
A cooperative Global South? Brazil, India, and China in multilateral regimes |
title_full |
A cooperative Global South? Brazil, India, and China in multilateral regimes |
title_fullStr |
A cooperative Global South? Brazil, India, and China in multilateral regimes |
title_full_unstemmed |
A cooperative Global South? Brazil, India, and China in multilateral regimes |
title_sort |
A cooperative Global South? Brazil, India, and China in multilateral regimes |
author |
Leal Ribeiro De Albuquerque, Felipe |
author_facet |
Leal Ribeiro De Albuquerque, Felipe |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Leal Ribeiro De Albuquerque, Felipe |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Multilateralism Regimes Brasil |
topic |
Multilateralism Regimes Brasil |
description |
Differently from the Cold War, emerging powers currently have chances to put forward their foreign policy goals. In their rise, countries such as Brazil, India, and China opted to follow similar sets of strategies within multilateral regimes. Ranging from blocking and free riding to cooperative behaviors, these states have enhanced their ability to promote topical changes in existing institutional settings. It does not mean, however, that their developing condition will necessarily prompt them to cooperate. As this paper will point out by means of a comparative analysis of the regimes of nuclear non-proliferation, peace and security, and climate change, these countries have more chances to cooperate when their interpretations of the principles and norms that compose a regime converge. Relying on how a country interprets normative frameworks and on the degree of membership a state has in a regime, this article challenges the notion that these three leaders of the so-called Global South would be relying on an all-encompassing cooperative multilateral behavior. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-10-11T13:55:23Z 2016 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10451/24816 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10451/24816 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Albuquerque, F. L. R. de (2016). A cooperative Global South? Brazil, India, and China in multilateral regimes. Revista Carta Internacional, 11 (1), 163-187 1413-0904 10.21530/ci.v11n1.2016.350 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editoria Carta Internacional - Associação Brasileira de Relações Internacionais (ABRI) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editoria Carta Internacional - Associação Brasileira de Relações Internacionais (ABRI) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134331404288000 |