Lobbying Brexit Negotiations: Who Lobbies Michel Barnier?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Coen, David
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Katsaitis, Alexander
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3666
Resumo: Interest groups have a vital role in international negotiations and carry the potential to influence their outcome. This article contributes to discussions surrounding Brexit and institutional change in the EU, focusing on Article 50 negotiations and stakeholder engagement. Drawing from theories on deliberative democracy and institutional legitimacy, we argue that different groups are given access to the Chief Negotiator depending on the resources they can contribute. Assessing our expectations, we inspect the entire interest group population that held meetings with Michel Barnier and his team from 2016 onwards. On the aggregate, we observe a pluralist approach. A closer inspection reveals a tightly knit circle of insiders that hold unparalleled access. To the extent that these meetings offer a glance into the future of EU lobbying, European trade and professional associations are likely to observe growing cohesion and significance. Conversely, UK private interests will see their presence and influence diluted as their relevance grows smaller in Brussels. Following the trends we observe, think tanks and socioeconomic interests are likely to experience a continuous surge in their involvement in stakeholder activities.
id RCAP_0bbe37d93159ddd7e42e711c1b25ab0e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3666
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Lobbying Brexit Negotiations: Who Lobbies Michel Barnier?Article 50; Brexit; European Union; interest groups; lobbying; pluralismInterest groups have a vital role in international negotiations and carry the potential to influence their outcome. This article contributes to discussions surrounding Brexit and institutional change in the EU, focusing on Article 50 negotiations and stakeholder engagement. Drawing from theories on deliberative democracy and institutional legitimacy, we argue that different groups are given access to the Chief Negotiator depending on the resources they can contribute. Assessing our expectations, we inspect the entire interest group population that held meetings with Michel Barnier and his team from 2016 onwards. On the aggregate, we observe a pluralist approach. A closer inspection reveals a tightly knit circle of insiders that hold unparalleled access. To the extent that these meetings offer a glance into the future of EU lobbying, European trade and professional associations are likely to observe growing cohesion and significance. Conversely, UK private interests will see their presence and influence diluted as their relevance grows smaller in Brussels. Following the trends we observe, think tanks and socioeconomic interests are likely to experience a continuous surge in their involvement in stakeholder activities.Cogitatio2021-01-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3666oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3666Politics and Governance; Vol 9, No 1 (2021): What Brexit Means for Europe: EU Institutions and Actors after the British Referendum; 37-472183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3666https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3666https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3666/3666Copyright (c) 2021 David Coen, Alexander Katsaitishttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCoen, DavidKatsaitis, Alexander2022-12-22T15:16:56Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3666Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:32.621210Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Lobbying Brexit Negotiations: Who Lobbies Michel Barnier?
title Lobbying Brexit Negotiations: Who Lobbies Michel Barnier?
spellingShingle Lobbying Brexit Negotiations: Who Lobbies Michel Barnier?
Coen, David
Article 50; Brexit; European Union; interest groups; lobbying; pluralism
title_short Lobbying Brexit Negotiations: Who Lobbies Michel Barnier?
title_full Lobbying Brexit Negotiations: Who Lobbies Michel Barnier?
title_fullStr Lobbying Brexit Negotiations: Who Lobbies Michel Barnier?
title_full_unstemmed Lobbying Brexit Negotiations: Who Lobbies Michel Barnier?
title_sort Lobbying Brexit Negotiations: Who Lobbies Michel Barnier?
author Coen, David
author_facet Coen, David
Katsaitis, Alexander
author_role author
author2 Katsaitis, Alexander
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Coen, David
Katsaitis, Alexander
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Article 50; Brexit; European Union; interest groups; lobbying; pluralism
topic Article 50; Brexit; European Union; interest groups; lobbying; pluralism
description Interest groups have a vital role in international negotiations and carry the potential to influence their outcome. This article contributes to discussions surrounding Brexit and institutional change in the EU, focusing on Article 50 negotiations and stakeholder engagement. Drawing from theories on deliberative democracy and institutional legitimacy, we argue that different groups are given access to the Chief Negotiator depending on the resources they can contribute. Assessing our expectations, we inspect the entire interest group population that held meetings with Michel Barnier and his team from 2016 onwards. On the aggregate, we observe a pluralist approach. A closer inspection reveals a tightly knit circle of insiders that hold unparalleled access. To the extent that these meetings offer a glance into the future of EU lobbying, European trade and professional associations are likely to observe growing cohesion and significance. Conversely, UK private interests will see their presence and influence diluted as their relevance grows smaller in Brussels. Following the trends we observe, think tanks and socioeconomic interests are likely to experience a continuous surge in their involvement in stakeholder activities.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-27
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3666
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3666
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3666
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3666
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3666
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3666
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3666/3666
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 David Coen, Alexander Katsaitis
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 David Coen, Alexander Katsaitis
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 9, No 1 (2021): What Brexit Means for Europe: EU Institutions and Actors after the British Referendum; 37-47
2183-2463
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130671118024704