Ambidextrous leadership, paradox and contingency: evidence from Angola
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/22502 |
Resumo: | The study departs from two assumptions. First, it considers that organizations, their leaders and the HRM function are inherently paradoxical and that, in that sense, dealing with paradox is a necessary component of the leadership process which requires ambidexterity capabilities. Second, it explores whether the paradoxes of leadership may manifest differently in different contexts. We explore the emergence of paradox in the leadership of Angolan organizations. Angola is an economy transitioning from a centrally planned to a market mode, and this makes it a rich site for understanding the specificities of ambidextrous paradoxical processes in an under-researched, ‘rest of the world’, context. The findings of our inductive study led to the emergence of four interrelated paradoxes and highlight the importance of ambidextrous paradoxical work as a HRM contingency. |
id |
RCAP_0c1ec4789192ccccea592eefddd76a82 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/22502 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Ambidextrous leadership, paradox and contingency: evidence from AngolaAmbidexterityAmbidextrous paradox workHRM in AngolaLeadershipThe study departs from two assumptions. First, it considers that organizations, their leaders and the HRM function are inherently paradoxical and that, in that sense, dealing with paradox is a necessary component of the leadership process which requires ambidexterity capabilities. Second, it explores whether the paradoxes of leadership may manifest differently in different contexts. We explore the emergence of paradox in the leadership of Angolan organizations. Angola is an economy transitioning from a centrally planned to a market mode, and this makes it a rich site for understanding the specificities of ambidextrous paradoxical processes in an under-researched, ‘rest of the world’, context. The findings of our inductive study led to the emergence of four interrelated paradoxes and highlight the importance of ambidextrous paradoxical work as a HRM contingency.Taylor & FrancisVeritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica PortuguesaCunha, Miguel Pina eFortes, ArmandaGomes, EmanuelRego, ArménioRodrigues, Filipa2017-07-12T17:19:36Z20192019-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/22502engCunha, M. P. e, Fortes, A., Gomes, E., Rego, A., & Rodrigues, F. (2019). Ambidextrous leadership, paradox and contingency: evidence from Angola. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(4), 702–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.120112510.1080/09585192.2016.120112584978969359000466169200009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-10-03T01:40:36Zoai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/22502Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:18:27.948342Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Ambidextrous leadership, paradox and contingency: evidence from Angola |
title |
Ambidextrous leadership, paradox and contingency: evidence from Angola |
spellingShingle |
Ambidextrous leadership, paradox and contingency: evidence from Angola Cunha, Miguel Pina e Ambidexterity Ambidextrous paradox work HRM in Angola Leadership |
title_short |
Ambidextrous leadership, paradox and contingency: evidence from Angola |
title_full |
Ambidextrous leadership, paradox and contingency: evidence from Angola |
title_fullStr |
Ambidextrous leadership, paradox and contingency: evidence from Angola |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ambidextrous leadership, paradox and contingency: evidence from Angola |
title_sort |
Ambidextrous leadership, paradox and contingency: evidence from Angola |
author |
Cunha, Miguel Pina e |
author_facet |
Cunha, Miguel Pina e Fortes, Armanda Gomes, Emanuel Rego, Arménio Rodrigues, Filipa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fortes, Armanda Gomes, Emanuel Rego, Arménio Rodrigues, Filipa |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica Portuguesa |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cunha, Miguel Pina e Fortes, Armanda Gomes, Emanuel Rego, Arménio Rodrigues, Filipa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ambidexterity Ambidextrous paradox work HRM in Angola Leadership |
topic |
Ambidexterity Ambidextrous paradox work HRM in Angola Leadership |
description |
The study departs from two assumptions. First, it considers that organizations, their leaders and the HRM function are inherently paradoxical and that, in that sense, dealing with paradox is a necessary component of the leadership process which requires ambidexterity capabilities. Second, it explores whether the paradoxes of leadership may manifest differently in different contexts. We explore the emergence of paradox in the leadership of Angolan organizations. Angola is an economy transitioning from a centrally planned to a market mode, and this makes it a rich site for understanding the specificities of ambidextrous paradoxical processes in an under-researched, ‘rest of the world’, context. The findings of our inductive study led to the emergence of four interrelated paradoxes and highlight the importance of ambidextrous paradoxical work as a HRM contingency. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-07-12T17:19:36Z 2019 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/22502 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/22502 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Cunha, M. P. e, Fortes, A., Gomes, E., Rego, A., & Rodrigues, F. (2019). Ambidextrous leadership, paradox and contingency: evidence from Angola. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(4), 702–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1201125 10.1080/09585192.2016.1201125 84978969359 000466169200009 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Taylor & Francis |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Taylor & Francis |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799131875963305984 |