Defining child maltreatment among lay people and community professionals: exploring consensus in ratings of severity
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10071/12260 |
Resumo: | The way in which laypeople and community professionals define child maltreatment in a family context is essential in decision-making on its referral and assessment. Despite differences found in the perspectives of the two groups, operating definitions are needed, which integrate them. The purpose of this work is to define types of maltreatment, integrating both perspectives (study 1) and to analyse the assessment of the severity of these practices (study 2). In study 1, a consensual qualitative research method was used to analyse 123 interviews of laypeople and 9 annual reports of social and health community services. A joint analysis of 1235 record units allowed us to obtain an integrated definition comprised of 6 types and 20 subtypes of maltreatment. In study 2, with the material gathered in study 1, a scale was created with 4 degrees of severity, based on the Maltreatment Classification System. Next, a sample of 159 interns, from health and social science areas with or without contact with situations of maltreatment, evaluated the severity of the items. An analysis of Kendall's coefficient of concordance showed a lack of consensus in 9 of the 20 subtypes, with physical abuse and sexual abuse being the most consensual types, as opposed to psychological abuse and neglect. These studies underscore the importance of understanding this phenomenon at a community level, and suggest that public awareness may facilitate the referral of these practices, minimizing the over-reporting and under-reporting of cases, and encouraging early and preventive intervention. |
id |
RCAP_0e8596d22a9359d03997f93f3605828c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/12260 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Defining child maltreatment among lay people and community professionals: exploring consensus in ratings of severityChild maltreatmentDefinitionSeverityCommunity professionalsLaypeopleThe way in which laypeople and community professionals define child maltreatment in a family context is essential in decision-making on its referral and assessment. Despite differences found in the perspectives of the two groups, operating definitions are needed, which integrate them. The purpose of this work is to define types of maltreatment, integrating both perspectives (study 1) and to analyse the assessment of the severity of these practices (study 2). In study 1, a consensual qualitative research method was used to analyse 123 interviews of laypeople and 9 annual reports of social and health community services. A joint analysis of 1235 record units allowed us to obtain an integrated definition comprised of 6 types and 20 subtypes of maltreatment. In study 2, with the material gathered in study 1, a scale was created with 4 degrees of severity, based on the Maltreatment Classification System. Next, a sample of 159 interns, from health and social science areas with or without contact with situations of maltreatment, evaluated the severity of the items. An analysis of Kendall's coefficient of concordance showed a lack of consensus in 9 of the 20 subtypes, with physical abuse and sexual abuse being the most consensual types, as opposed to psychological abuse and neglect. These studies underscore the importance of understanding this phenomenon at a community level, and suggest that public awareness may facilitate the referral of these practices, minimizing the over-reporting and under-reporting of cases, and encouraging early and preventive intervention.Springer2016-12-14T15:07:56Z2016-01-01T00:00:00Z20162019-03-26T17:19:45Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/12260eng1062-102410.1007/s10826-016-0385-xCalheiros, M. M.Monteiro, M. B.Patrício, J. N.Carmona, M.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:56:50Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/12260Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:29:14.724074Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Defining child maltreatment among lay people and community professionals: exploring consensus in ratings of severity |
title |
Defining child maltreatment among lay people and community professionals: exploring consensus in ratings of severity |
spellingShingle |
Defining child maltreatment among lay people and community professionals: exploring consensus in ratings of severity Calheiros, M. M. Child maltreatment Definition Severity Community professionals Laypeople |
title_short |
Defining child maltreatment among lay people and community professionals: exploring consensus in ratings of severity |
title_full |
Defining child maltreatment among lay people and community professionals: exploring consensus in ratings of severity |
title_fullStr |
Defining child maltreatment among lay people and community professionals: exploring consensus in ratings of severity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Defining child maltreatment among lay people and community professionals: exploring consensus in ratings of severity |
title_sort |
Defining child maltreatment among lay people and community professionals: exploring consensus in ratings of severity |
author |
Calheiros, M. M. |
author_facet |
Calheiros, M. M. Monteiro, M. B. Patrício, J. N. Carmona, M. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Monteiro, M. B. Patrício, J. N. Carmona, M. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Calheiros, M. M. Monteiro, M. B. Patrício, J. N. Carmona, M. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Child maltreatment Definition Severity Community professionals Laypeople |
topic |
Child maltreatment Definition Severity Community professionals Laypeople |
description |
The way in which laypeople and community professionals define child maltreatment in a family context is essential in decision-making on its referral and assessment. Despite differences found in the perspectives of the two groups, operating definitions are needed, which integrate them. The purpose of this work is to define types of maltreatment, integrating both perspectives (study 1) and to analyse the assessment of the severity of these practices (study 2). In study 1, a consensual qualitative research method was used to analyse 123 interviews of laypeople and 9 annual reports of social and health community services. A joint analysis of 1235 record units allowed us to obtain an integrated definition comprised of 6 types and 20 subtypes of maltreatment. In study 2, with the material gathered in study 1, a scale was created with 4 degrees of severity, based on the Maltreatment Classification System. Next, a sample of 159 interns, from health and social science areas with or without contact with situations of maltreatment, evaluated the severity of the items. An analysis of Kendall's coefficient of concordance showed a lack of consensus in 9 of the 20 subtypes, with physical abuse and sexual abuse being the most consensual types, as opposed to psychological abuse and neglect. These studies underscore the importance of understanding this phenomenon at a community level, and suggest that public awareness may facilitate the referral of these practices, minimizing the over-reporting and under-reporting of cases, and encouraging early and preventive intervention. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-12-14T15:07:56Z 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z 2016 2019-03-26T17:19:45Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/12260 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/12260 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
1062-1024 10.1007/s10826-016-0385-x |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134854450774016 |