Defining child maltreatment among lay people and community professionals: exploring consensus in ratings of severity

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Calheiros, M. M.
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Monteiro, M. B., Patrício, J. N., Carmona, M.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/12260
Resumo: The way in which laypeople and community professionals define child maltreatment in a family context is essential in decision-making on its referral and assessment. Despite differences found in the perspectives of the two groups, operating definitions are needed, which integrate them. The purpose of this work is to define types of maltreatment, integrating both perspectives (study 1) and to analyse the assessment of the severity of these practices (study 2). In study 1, a consensual qualitative research method was used to analyse 123 interviews of laypeople and 9 annual reports of social and health community services. A joint analysis of 1235 record units allowed us to obtain an integrated definition comprised of 6 types and 20 subtypes of maltreatment. In study 2, with the material gathered in study 1, a scale was created with 4 degrees of severity, based on the Maltreatment Classification System. Next, a sample of 159 interns, from health and social science areas with or without contact with situations of maltreatment, evaluated the severity of the items. An analysis of Kendall's coefficient of concordance showed a lack of consensus in 9 of the 20 subtypes, with physical abuse and sexual abuse being the most consensual types, as opposed to psychological abuse and neglect. These studies underscore the importance of understanding this phenomenon at a community level, and suggest that public awareness may facilitate the referral of these practices, minimizing the over-reporting and under-reporting of cases, and encouraging early and preventive intervention.
id RCAP_0e8596d22a9359d03997f93f3605828c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/12260
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Defining child maltreatment among lay people and community professionals: exploring consensus in ratings of severityChild maltreatmentDefinitionSeverityCommunity professionalsLaypeopleThe way in which laypeople and community professionals define child maltreatment in a family context is essential in decision-making on its referral and assessment. Despite differences found in the perspectives of the two groups, operating definitions are needed, which integrate them. The purpose of this work is to define types of maltreatment, integrating both perspectives (study 1) and to analyse the assessment of the severity of these practices (study 2). In study 1, a consensual qualitative research method was used to analyse 123 interviews of laypeople and 9 annual reports of social and health community services. A joint analysis of 1235 record units allowed us to obtain an integrated definition comprised of 6 types and 20 subtypes of maltreatment. In study 2, with the material gathered in study 1, a scale was created with 4 degrees of severity, based on the Maltreatment Classification System. Next, a sample of 159 interns, from health and social science areas with or without contact with situations of maltreatment, evaluated the severity of the items. An analysis of Kendall's coefficient of concordance showed a lack of consensus in 9 of the 20 subtypes, with physical abuse and sexual abuse being the most consensual types, as opposed to psychological abuse and neglect. These studies underscore the importance of understanding this phenomenon at a community level, and suggest that public awareness may facilitate the referral of these practices, minimizing the over-reporting and under-reporting of cases, and encouraging early and preventive intervention.Springer2016-12-14T15:07:56Z2016-01-01T00:00:00Z20162019-03-26T17:19:45Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/12260eng1062-102410.1007/s10826-016-0385-xCalheiros, M. M.Monteiro, M. B.Patrício, J. N.Carmona, M.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:56:50Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/12260Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:29:14.724074Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Defining child maltreatment among lay people and community professionals: exploring consensus in ratings of severity
title Defining child maltreatment among lay people and community professionals: exploring consensus in ratings of severity
spellingShingle Defining child maltreatment among lay people and community professionals: exploring consensus in ratings of severity
Calheiros, M. M.
Child maltreatment
Definition
Severity
Community professionals
Laypeople
title_short Defining child maltreatment among lay people and community professionals: exploring consensus in ratings of severity
title_full Defining child maltreatment among lay people and community professionals: exploring consensus in ratings of severity
title_fullStr Defining child maltreatment among lay people and community professionals: exploring consensus in ratings of severity
title_full_unstemmed Defining child maltreatment among lay people and community professionals: exploring consensus in ratings of severity
title_sort Defining child maltreatment among lay people and community professionals: exploring consensus in ratings of severity
author Calheiros, M. M.
author_facet Calheiros, M. M.
Monteiro, M. B.
Patrício, J. N.
Carmona, M.
author_role author
author2 Monteiro, M. B.
Patrício, J. N.
Carmona, M.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Calheiros, M. M.
Monteiro, M. B.
Patrício, J. N.
Carmona, M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Child maltreatment
Definition
Severity
Community professionals
Laypeople
topic Child maltreatment
Definition
Severity
Community professionals
Laypeople
description The way in which laypeople and community professionals define child maltreatment in a family context is essential in decision-making on its referral and assessment. Despite differences found in the perspectives of the two groups, operating definitions are needed, which integrate them. The purpose of this work is to define types of maltreatment, integrating both perspectives (study 1) and to analyse the assessment of the severity of these practices (study 2). In study 1, a consensual qualitative research method was used to analyse 123 interviews of laypeople and 9 annual reports of social and health community services. A joint analysis of 1235 record units allowed us to obtain an integrated definition comprised of 6 types and 20 subtypes of maltreatment. In study 2, with the material gathered in study 1, a scale was created with 4 degrees of severity, based on the Maltreatment Classification System. Next, a sample of 159 interns, from health and social science areas with or without contact with situations of maltreatment, evaluated the severity of the items. An analysis of Kendall's coefficient of concordance showed a lack of consensus in 9 of the 20 subtypes, with physical abuse and sexual abuse being the most consensual types, as opposed to psychological abuse and neglect. These studies underscore the importance of understanding this phenomenon at a community level, and suggest that public awareness may facilitate the referral of these practices, minimizing the over-reporting and under-reporting of cases, and encouraging early and preventive intervention.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-14T15:07:56Z
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
2016
2019-03-26T17:19:45Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/12260
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/12260
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1062-1024
10.1007/s10826-016-0385-x
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134854450774016