Hopeful Monsters : A Note on Multiple Conclusions

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dicher, Bogdan
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10451/44467
Resumo: Arguments, the story goes, have one or more premises and only one conclusion. A contentious generalisation allows arguments with several disjunctively connected conclusions. Contentious as this generalisation may be, I will argue nevertheless that it is justified. My main claim is that multiple conclusions are epiphenomena of the logical connectives: some connectives determine, in a certain sense, multiple-conclusion derivations. Therefore, such derivations are completely natural and can safely be used in proof-theoretic semantics.
id RCAP_0eaecc3487d6b81cb2c374f9f0db8b72
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/44467
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Hopeful Monsters : A Note on Multiple ConclusionsPhilosophy of logicArguments, the story goes, have one or more premises and only one conclusion. A contentious generalisation allows arguments with several disjunctively connected conclusions. Contentious as this generalisation may be, I will argue nevertheless that it is justified. My main claim is that multiple conclusions are epiphenomena of the logical connectives: some connectives determine, in a certain sense, multiple-conclusion derivations. Therefore, such derivations are completely natural and can safely be used in proof-theoretic semantics.Repositório da Universidade de LisboaDicher, Bogdan2020-09-30T10:45:31Z20182018-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/44467engDicher, B. Hopeful Monsters: A Note on Multiple Conclusions. Erkenn 85, 77–98 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-018-0019-30165-010610.1007/s10670-018-0019-31572-8420info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-08T16:45:31Zoai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/44467Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:57:01.546828Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Hopeful Monsters : A Note on Multiple Conclusions
title Hopeful Monsters : A Note on Multiple Conclusions
spellingShingle Hopeful Monsters : A Note on Multiple Conclusions
Dicher, Bogdan
Philosophy of logic
title_short Hopeful Monsters : A Note on Multiple Conclusions
title_full Hopeful Monsters : A Note on Multiple Conclusions
title_fullStr Hopeful Monsters : A Note on Multiple Conclusions
title_full_unstemmed Hopeful Monsters : A Note on Multiple Conclusions
title_sort Hopeful Monsters : A Note on Multiple Conclusions
author Dicher, Bogdan
author_facet Dicher, Bogdan
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dicher, Bogdan
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Philosophy of logic
topic Philosophy of logic
description Arguments, the story goes, have one or more premises and only one conclusion. A contentious generalisation allows arguments with several disjunctively connected conclusions. Contentious as this generalisation may be, I will argue nevertheless that it is justified. My main claim is that multiple conclusions are epiphenomena of the logical connectives: some connectives determine, in a certain sense, multiple-conclusion derivations. Therefore, such derivations are completely natural and can safely be used in proof-theoretic semantics.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z
2020-09-30T10:45:31Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10451/44467
url http://hdl.handle.net/10451/44467
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Dicher, B. Hopeful Monsters: A Note on Multiple Conclusions. Erkenn 85, 77–98 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-018-0019-3
0165-0106
10.1007/s10670-018-0019-3
1572-8420
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134513424498688

Registros relacionados