Current Trends and Perceptions of the Portuguese Gynecology Experts on Hormonal Intrauterine Contraception: The DIOGIN Study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Brito, M
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Costa, AR, Pacheco, A, Rebelo, C, Castro, MG, Martins, I, Palma, F
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/4169
Resumo: Overview and Aims: Intrauterine systems (IUS) are one of the most effective forms of long acting reversible birth control, with low failure rates and high continuity and satisfaction rates. Still, they account for a small proportion of contraception use, which may be due to several myths and misperceptions. With this study, we aimed to assess Portuguese experts’ perceptions on potential benefits and fears that may limit women’s contraception choice and to identify current trends in clinical practice. Methods and Population: We performed an observational, descriptive and analytical study in which gynecologists/obstetricians were invited to answer an anonymous questionnaire by call or email made of multiple-choice questions on IUS use. Results: A total of 482 Portuguese Gynecologists answered the survey, of which 97.1% revealed that the insertion of IUS is a common procedure in their current clinical practice. More than 95% considered the insertion of IUS an easy procedure and a safe contraceptive method. Cost-efficacy and the fact that this method doesn’t rely on womens action to be effective were the top benefits for IUS users, perceived by the physicians. On the other hand, concern about having a foreign object inside the body and fear of insertion pain were perceived by the physicians as the top barriers to IUS use. Female gynecologists perceived a higher degree of pain associated with IUS insertion (p=0.021). Overall, gynecology experts’ opinions were conservative regarding IUS recommendations to women. Conclusions: The results of this study provide a general insight towards Portuguese gynecologists’ perceptions, opinions and attitudes on the use of IUS. Most of the experts consider IUS a safe contraception method but, on the other hand, there is still concern about its use in particular female conditions which may in part contribute to the low rate of IUS use in Portuguese women.
id RCAP_0f22c1458c20ea9b48a175bef33f9233
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.chlc.min-saude.pt:10400.17/4169
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Current Trends and Perceptions of the Portuguese Gynecology Experts on Hormonal Intrauterine Contraception: The DIOGIN StudyTendências e Perceções dos Ginecologistas Portugueses sobre Contraceção Hormonal Intrauterina: o Estudo DIOGINContraceptionIUSCounselingGynecologists perceptionPainMAC GINOverview and Aims: Intrauterine systems (IUS) are one of the most effective forms of long acting reversible birth control, with low failure rates and high continuity and satisfaction rates. Still, they account for a small proportion of contraception use, which may be due to several myths and misperceptions. With this study, we aimed to assess Portuguese experts’ perceptions on potential benefits and fears that may limit women’s contraception choice and to identify current trends in clinical practice. Methods and Population: We performed an observational, descriptive and analytical study in which gynecologists/obstetricians were invited to answer an anonymous questionnaire by call or email made of multiple-choice questions on IUS use. Results: A total of 482 Portuguese Gynecologists answered the survey, of which 97.1% revealed that the insertion of IUS is a common procedure in their current clinical practice. More than 95% considered the insertion of IUS an easy procedure and a safe contraceptive method. Cost-efficacy and the fact that this method doesn’t rely on womens action to be effective were the top benefits for IUS users, perceived by the physicians. On the other hand, concern about having a foreign object inside the body and fear of insertion pain were perceived by the physicians as the top barriers to IUS use. Female gynecologists perceived a higher degree of pain associated with IUS insertion (p=0.021). Overall, gynecology experts’ opinions were conservative regarding IUS recommendations to women. Conclusions: The results of this study provide a general insight towards Portuguese gynecologists’ perceptions, opinions and attitudes on the use of IUS. Most of the experts consider IUS a safe contraception method but, on the other hand, there is still concern about its use in particular female conditions which may in part contribute to the low rate of IUS use in Portuguese women.Federação das Sociedades Portuguesas de Obstetrícia e GinecologiaRepositório do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, EPEBrito, MCosta, ARPacheco, ARebelo, CCastro, MGMartins, IPalma, F2022-07-28T14:41:05Z20202020-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/4169porActa Obstet Ginecol Port 2020;14(2):74-82info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-10T09:45:38Zoai:repositorio.chlc.min-saude.pt:10400.17/4169Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:21:30.284799Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Current Trends and Perceptions of the Portuguese Gynecology Experts on Hormonal Intrauterine Contraception: The DIOGIN Study
Tendências e Perceções dos Ginecologistas Portugueses sobre Contraceção Hormonal Intrauterina: o Estudo DIOGIN
title Current Trends and Perceptions of the Portuguese Gynecology Experts on Hormonal Intrauterine Contraception: The DIOGIN Study
spellingShingle Current Trends and Perceptions of the Portuguese Gynecology Experts on Hormonal Intrauterine Contraception: The DIOGIN Study
Brito, M
Contraception
IUS
Counseling
Gynecologists perception
Pain
MAC GIN
title_short Current Trends and Perceptions of the Portuguese Gynecology Experts on Hormonal Intrauterine Contraception: The DIOGIN Study
title_full Current Trends and Perceptions of the Portuguese Gynecology Experts on Hormonal Intrauterine Contraception: The DIOGIN Study
title_fullStr Current Trends and Perceptions of the Portuguese Gynecology Experts on Hormonal Intrauterine Contraception: The DIOGIN Study
title_full_unstemmed Current Trends and Perceptions of the Portuguese Gynecology Experts on Hormonal Intrauterine Contraception: The DIOGIN Study
title_sort Current Trends and Perceptions of the Portuguese Gynecology Experts on Hormonal Intrauterine Contraception: The DIOGIN Study
author Brito, M
author_facet Brito, M
Costa, AR
Pacheco, A
Rebelo, C
Castro, MG
Martins, I
Palma, F
author_role author
author2 Costa, AR
Pacheco, A
Rebelo, C
Castro, MG
Martins, I
Palma, F
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, EPE
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Brito, M
Costa, AR
Pacheco, A
Rebelo, C
Castro, MG
Martins, I
Palma, F
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Contraception
IUS
Counseling
Gynecologists perception
Pain
MAC GIN
topic Contraception
IUS
Counseling
Gynecologists perception
Pain
MAC GIN
description Overview and Aims: Intrauterine systems (IUS) are one of the most effective forms of long acting reversible birth control, with low failure rates and high continuity and satisfaction rates. Still, they account for a small proportion of contraception use, which may be due to several myths and misperceptions. With this study, we aimed to assess Portuguese experts’ perceptions on potential benefits and fears that may limit women’s contraception choice and to identify current trends in clinical practice. Methods and Population: We performed an observational, descriptive and analytical study in which gynecologists/obstetricians were invited to answer an anonymous questionnaire by call or email made of multiple-choice questions on IUS use. Results: A total of 482 Portuguese Gynecologists answered the survey, of which 97.1% revealed that the insertion of IUS is a common procedure in their current clinical practice. More than 95% considered the insertion of IUS an easy procedure and a safe contraceptive method. Cost-efficacy and the fact that this method doesn’t rely on womens action to be effective were the top benefits for IUS users, perceived by the physicians. On the other hand, concern about having a foreign object inside the body and fear of insertion pain were perceived by the physicians as the top barriers to IUS use. Female gynecologists perceived a higher degree of pain associated with IUS insertion (p=0.021). Overall, gynecology experts’ opinions were conservative regarding IUS recommendations to women. Conclusions: The results of this study provide a general insight towards Portuguese gynecologists’ perceptions, opinions and attitudes on the use of IUS. Most of the experts consider IUS a safe contraception method but, on the other hand, there is still concern about its use in particular female conditions which may in part contribute to the low rate of IUS use in Portuguese women.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
2022-07-28T14:41:05Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/4169
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/4169
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Acta Obstet Ginecol Port 2020;14(2):74-82
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federação das Sociedades Portuguesas de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federação das Sociedades Portuguesas de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131310139113472