Low-cost reusable instrumentation for laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy: assessment in a porcine model

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Autorino, R
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Kim, FJ, Rane, A, De Sio, M, Stein, RJ, Micali, S, Correia-Pinto, J, Kaouk, JH, Lima, E
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.23/505
Resumo: PURPOSE: To test different sets of prebent instruments and a new reusable access device for laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three surgeons with previous experience in LESS performed 12 nephrectomies in six pigs. In all procedures, a multichannel access device (X-CONE) and a 5-mm extra-long telescope were used. Four sets of prebent instruments with different profiles (S-portal) were tested: Standard (one straight scissors and one curved grasper), Cuschieri, Carus, and Leroy set (each of them consisting of two curved instruments with different configurations). Assessment was performed based on both objective (procedure time; time to manage the pedicle; time to free kidney) and subjective parameters (entry/exit of instruments; triangulation; dissection up/down; dissection lateral; retraction; interdependence). The subjective assessment tool used was a Likert type scale (1 = easy to 5 = prohibitive). The access device was assessed by using objective (time to complete insertion of device after skin incision) and subjective (significant air leakage, movement constraint) parameters. RESULTS: Time to insertion of the X-CONE was <1 minute in all the cases. Surgeons reported significant insufflant leakage in 58% of cases. The procedure was completed in 10/12 (83%) cases. Mean operative time was 8.3 ± 4.2 minutes, being lower for the Carus group (4.5 min) and higher for the standard group (13 min). Among the different sets, the standard one obtained the best mean scores for all subjective parameters. CONCLUSIONS: X-CONE allows easy abdominal access, and its reusable properties represent cost savings for LESS compared with disposable devices. Prebent instruments might also represent attractive low-cost tools for LESS.
id RCAP_0f626e7518e66bdc15ff6a0b50c36881
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.hospitaldebraga.pt:10400.23/505
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Low-cost reusable instrumentation for laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy: assessment in a porcine modelLaparoscópiosNefrectomiaSus scrofaAnimaisPURPOSE: To test different sets of prebent instruments and a new reusable access device for laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three surgeons with previous experience in LESS performed 12 nephrectomies in six pigs. In all procedures, a multichannel access device (X-CONE) and a 5-mm extra-long telescope were used. Four sets of prebent instruments with different profiles (S-portal) were tested: Standard (one straight scissors and one curved grasper), Cuschieri, Carus, and Leroy set (each of them consisting of two curved instruments with different configurations). Assessment was performed based on both objective (procedure time; time to manage the pedicle; time to free kidney) and subjective parameters (entry/exit of instruments; triangulation; dissection up/down; dissection lateral; retraction; interdependence). The subjective assessment tool used was a Likert type scale (1 = easy to 5 = prohibitive). The access device was assessed by using objective (time to complete insertion of device after skin incision) and subjective (significant air leakage, movement constraint) parameters. RESULTS: Time to insertion of the X-CONE was <1 minute in all the cases. Surgeons reported significant insufflant leakage in 58% of cases. The procedure was completed in 10/12 (83%) cases. Mean operative time was 8.3 ± 4.2 minutes, being lower for the Carus group (4.5 min) and higher for the standard group (13 min). Among the different sets, the standard one obtained the best mean scores for all subjective parameters. CONCLUSIONS: X-CONE allows easy abdominal access, and its reusable properties represent cost savings for LESS compared with disposable devices. Prebent instruments might also represent attractive low-cost tools for LESS.Repositório Científico do Hospital de BragaAutorino, RKim, FJRane, ADe Sio, MStein, RJMicali, SCorreia-Pinto, JKaouk, JHLima, E2013-09-16T21:00:56Z2011-01-01T00:00:00Z2011-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.23/505engJ Endourol. 2011;25(3):419-24.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-09-21T09:02:10Zoai:repositorio.hospitaldebraga.pt:10400.23/505Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:55:09.935905Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Low-cost reusable instrumentation for laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy: assessment in a porcine model
title Low-cost reusable instrumentation for laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy: assessment in a porcine model
spellingShingle Low-cost reusable instrumentation for laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy: assessment in a porcine model
Autorino, R
Laparoscópios
Nefrectomia
Sus scrofa
Animais
title_short Low-cost reusable instrumentation for laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy: assessment in a porcine model
title_full Low-cost reusable instrumentation for laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy: assessment in a porcine model
title_fullStr Low-cost reusable instrumentation for laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy: assessment in a porcine model
title_full_unstemmed Low-cost reusable instrumentation for laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy: assessment in a porcine model
title_sort Low-cost reusable instrumentation for laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy: assessment in a porcine model
author Autorino, R
author_facet Autorino, R
Kim, FJ
Rane, A
De Sio, M
Stein, RJ
Micali, S
Correia-Pinto, J
Kaouk, JH
Lima, E
author_role author
author2 Kim, FJ
Rane, A
De Sio, M
Stein, RJ
Micali, S
Correia-Pinto, J
Kaouk, JH
Lima, E
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico do Hospital de Braga
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Autorino, R
Kim, FJ
Rane, A
De Sio, M
Stein, RJ
Micali, S
Correia-Pinto, J
Kaouk, JH
Lima, E
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Laparoscópios
Nefrectomia
Sus scrofa
Animais
topic Laparoscópios
Nefrectomia
Sus scrofa
Animais
description PURPOSE: To test different sets of prebent instruments and a new reusable access device for laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three surgeons with previous experience in LESS performed 12 nephrectomies in six pigs. In all procedures, a multichannel access device (X-CONE) and a 5-mm extra-long telescope were used. Four sets of prebent instruments with different profiles (S-portal) were tested: Standard (one straight scissors and one curved grasper), Cuschieri, Carus, and Leroy set (each of them consisting of two curved instruments with different configurations). Assessment was performed based on both objective (procedure time; time to manage the pedicle; time to free kidney) and subjective parameters (entry/exit of instruments; triangulation; dissection up/down; dissection lateral; retraction; interdependence). The subjective assessment tool used was a Likert type scale (1 = easy to 5 = prohibitive). The access device was assessed by using objective (time to complete insertion of device after skin incision) and subjective (significant air leakage, movement constraint) parameters. RESULTS: Time to insertion of the X-CONE was <1 minute in all the cases. Surgeons reported significant insufflant leakage in 58% of cases. The procedure was completed in 10/12 (83%) cases. Mean operative time was 8.3 ± 4.2 minutes, being lower for the Carus group (4.5 min) and higher for the standard group (13 min). Among the different sets, the standard one obtained the best mean scores for all subjective parameters. CONCLUSIONS: X-CONE allows easy abdominal access, and its reusable properties represent cost savings for LESS compared with disposable devices. Prebent instruments might also represent attractive low-cost tools for LESS.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-01-01T00:00:00Z
2011-01-01T00:00:00Z
2013-09-16T21:00:56Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.23/505
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.23/505
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv J Endourol. 2011;25(3):419-24.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130419410501632