Aphorisation et cadrage interprétatif
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | por |
| Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
| Texto Completo: | https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/re/article/view/3588 |
Resumo: | Most linguists consider that utterances are basically texts, units above sentence level, associated with genres of discourse, and that sentences which do not belong to texts are a peripheral phenomena: sayings, maxims, slogans…. In this article I claim that speech can function under two regimes: the aphorizing regime, i.e. the regime of sentences which are independent of textuality and genericity. In the aphorising regime one must make a distinction between “primary” (which have not been detached from a text) “secondary (detached from a text) aphorisations. After having focused on the main pragmatic properties of aphorisation, in particular on the properties of the aphoriser (the “enunciator” of an aphorisation), I propose to classify the various kinds of the secondary aphorisations according to the “framing” in which they are put in order to be interpreted. An aphorisation can be interpreted in various ways, according to the “framing” it is referred to: “informational”, “testimonial”, “historical”, “sapiential”. |
| id |
RCAP_0f6992d40013534198f4d0110564615e |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.letras.up.pt/ojs:article/3588 |
| network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
| network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
| repository_id_str |
7160 |
| spelling |
Aphorisation et cadrage interprétatifMost linguists consider that utterances are basically texts, units above sentence level, associated with genres of discourse, and that sentences which do not belong to texts are a peripheral phenomena: sayings, maxims, slogans…. In this article I claim that speech can function under two regimes: the aphorizing regime, i.e. the regime of sentences which are independent of textuality and genericity. In the aphorising regime one must make a distinction between “primary” (which have not been detached from a text) “secondary (detached from a text) aphorisations. After having focused on the main pragmatic properties of aphorisation, in particular on the properties of the aphoriser (the “enunciator” of an aphorisation), I propose to classify the various kinds of the secondary aphorisations according to the “framing” in which they are put in order to be interpreted. An aphorisation can be interpreted in various ways, according to the “framing” it is referred to: “informational”, “testimonial”, “historical”, “sapiential”.Les linguistes considèrent communément que les énoncés sont fondamentalement des unités transphrastiques, des textes, associés à des genres de discours, et que les phrases hors d’une structure textuelle sont des phénomènes marginaux : dictons, slogans, maximes...Dans cet article je défends l’idée que l’énonciation est en réalité partagée entre deux régimes: l’énonciation aphorisante, celui de phrases qui sont posées hors du texte et du genre de discours, et l’énonciation textualisante. L’énonciation aphorisante, ou aphorisation, se divise elle-même en aphorisations «primaires» (non détachée d’un texte) et «secondaires» (détachées d’un texte). Après avoir souligné quelques caractéristiques pragma-tiques majeures de l’énonciation aphorisante et en particulier de l’aphoriseur, c’est-à-dire de l’énonciateur d’aphorisations, je propose une classification des divers types d’aphorisations secondaire en fonction du «cadrage» dans lequel elles sont placées quand on les interprète. La même aphorisation peut en effet être interprétée différemment en fonction du cadrage auquel il est référé: «informationnel», «testimonial», «événementiel», «sapiential»Redis: Revista de Estudos do Discurso2013-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/re/article/view/3588Redis: Revista de Estudos do Discurso; N.º 2 (2013): REDIS: Revista de Estudos do Discurso; 100-1162183-3958reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/re/article/view/3588https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/re/article/view/3588/3350Direitos de Autor (c) 2018 Redis: Revista de Estudos do discursoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMaingueneau, Dominique2023-01-13T11:15:32Zoai:ojs.letras.up.pt/ojs:article/3588Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:29:34.089991Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Aphorisation et cadrage interprétatif |
| title |
Aphorisation et cadrage interprétatif |
| spellingShingle |
Aphorisation et cadrage interprétatif Maingueneau, Dominique |
| title_short |
Aphorisation et cadrage interprétatif |
| title_full |
Aphorisation et cadrage interprétatif |
| title_fullStr |
Aphorisation et cadrage interprétatif |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Aphorisation et cadrage interprétatif |
| title_sort |
Aphorisation et cadrage interprétatif |
| author |
Maingueneau, Dominique |
| author_facet |
Maingueneau, Dominique |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Maingueneau, Dominique |
| description |
Most linguists consider that utterances are basically texts, units above sentence level, associated with genres of discourse, and that sentences which do not belong to texts are a peripheral phenomena: sayings, maxims, slogans…. In this article I claim that speech can function under two regimes: the aphorizing regime, i.e. the regime of sentences which are independent of textuality and genericity. In the aphorising regime one must make a distinction between “primary” (which have not been detached from a text) “secondary (detached from a text) aphorisations. After having focused on the main pragmatic properties of aphorisation, in particular on the properties of the aphoriser (the “enunciator” of an aphorisation), I propose to classify the various kinds of the secondary aphorisations according to the “framing” in which they are put in order to be interpreted. An aphorisation can be interpreted in various ways, according to the “framing” it is referred to: “informational”, “testimonial”, “historical”, “sapiential”. |
| publishDate |
2013 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-12-01 |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/re/article/view/3588 |
| url |
https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/re/article/view/3588 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/re/article/view/3588 https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/re/article/view/3588/3350 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2018 Redis: Revista de Estudos do discurso info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2018 Redis: Revista de Estudos do discurso |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Redis: Revista de Estudos do Discurso |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Redis: Revista de Estudos do Discurso |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Redis: Revista de Estudos do Discurso; N.º 2 (2013): REDIS: Revista de Estudos do Discurso; 100-116 2183-3958 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
| instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
| instacron_str |
RCAAP |
| institution |
RCAAP |
| reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
| collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1799130753125056512 |