ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION INDEXED IN SCOPUS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Reyes Flores, Luis Gerardo
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Mejía Rivera, Kevin Arnaldo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.20.4.2024.e1116
Resumo: The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in research has shown a growing trend in recent years, gaining significant attention from the scientific community compared to other techniques and software for information analysis. Objective to conduct an analysis of the main trends in the use of AI in qualitative research to characterize how AI is being employed in such scientific production. Methods involved a bibliometric analysis of scientific articles indexed in Scopus, using the VosViewer tool, followed by a conventional analysis of data grouped by type, volume of articles, citations, and their respective dating. Results identified four clusters; the first one concentrates 161 occurrences and a score of 572 in its relationship strength. Meanwhile, the second cluster recorded 144 occurrences and a score of 1004 in its relationship strength. Clusters 3 and 4 present lower relationship strength scores. Cluster 1 stands out because it presents the highest number of occurrences linked to the use of AI as the methodology used in the analyzed research. Characterization shows that research oriented towards knowledge production (pure research) surpasses research with an innovation component, representing only one-third of the total. The citation volume of the former also exceeds that of the latter. Additionally, it was observed that the fields of Computer Science and Medicine are the most prominent in this topic. Conclusions AI applied to qualitative research constitutes an increasingly common tool. Three key factors stand out in the use of AI in qualitative research: as a strategy to automate decision-making, to enhance human action, and to investigate as an effect of external factors.
id RCAP_11369c7a9594cd4a37545d20fff4a3d6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.publi.ludomedia.org:article/1116
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION INDEXED IN SCOPUSEl INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL EN LA INVESTIGACIÓN CUALITATIVA: ANÁLISIS BIBLIOMÉTRICO DE LA PRODUCCIÓN CIENTÍFICA INDIZADA EN SCOPUSBibliometric Analysis, Artificial Intelligence, Qualitative Research, ScopusThe use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in research has shown a growing trend in recent years, gaining significant attention from the scientific community compared to other techniques and software for information analysis. Objective to conduct an analysis of the main trends in the use of AI in qualitative research to characterize how AI is being employed in such scientific production. Methods involved a bibliometric analysis of scientific articles indexed in Scopus, using the VosViewer tool, followed by a conventional analysis of data grouped by type, volume of articles, citations, and their respective dating. Results identified four clusters; the first one concentrates 161 occurrences and a score of 572 in its relationship strength. Meanwhile, the second cluster recorded 144 occurrences and a score of 1004 in its relationship strength. Clusters 3 and 4 present lower relationship strength scores. Cluster 1 stands out because it presents the highest number of occurrences linked to the use of AI as the methodology used in the analyzed research. Characterization shows that research oriented towards knowledge production (pure research) surpasses research with an innovation component, representing only one-third of the total. The citation volume of the former also exceeds that of the latter. Additionally, it was observed that the fields of Computer Science and Medicine are the most prominent in this topic. Conclusions AI applied to qualitative research constitutes an increasingly common tool. Three key factors stand out in the use of AI in qualitative research: as a strategy to automate decision-making, to enhance human action, and to investigate as an effect of external factors.El uso de la Inteligencia Artificial (IA) en la investigación ha mostrado una tendencia creciente en los últimos años, ganando un espacio importante en el interés de la comunidad científica, frente a otras técnicas y softwares de análisis de información. Mediante este trabajo, se pretende realizar un análisis de las principales tendencias en el uso de la IA en la investigación cualitativa que permita caracterizar de qué forma se está empleando la IA en dicha producción científica.  Se empleó un análisis bibliométrico de artículos científicos, indizados en Scopus, mediante el uso de la herramienta VosViewer; y, posteriormente, se realizó un análisis convencional de datos agrupados por tipo, volumen de artículos y citas, así como su respectiva datación. Se identificaron cuatro clústeres: el primero agrupa 161 ocurrencias y una puntuación de 572 en su fuerza de relación. Por su parte, el segundo clúster registra 144 ocurrencias y una puntuación de 1004 en su fuerza de relación. Los clústeres 3 y 4 presentan puntuaciones inferiores de fuerza de relación. Se destaca el clúster 1 porque presenta la mayor cantidad de ocurrencias vinculadas al uso de IA como metodología utilizada en las investigaciones analizadas. La caracterización demuestra que las investigaciones orientadas a la producción de conocimiento (investigación pura) superan a las investigaciones con componente de innovación, que solo representan un tercio del total. El volumen de citación de las primeras también supera al de las segundas. Además, se observó que los campos de mayor auge en este tema son las Ciencias de la Computación y la Medicina.  La IA aplicada a investigación cualitativa constituye una herramienta cada vez más frecuente. Sobresalen tres factores clave en el uso de IA en investigaciones cualitativas: como estrategia para automatizar la toma de decisiones, para potenciar la acción humana y para investigar como efecto de factores externos.Ludomedia2024-11-25info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.20.4.2024.e1116https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.20.4.2024.e1116New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 20 No. 4 (2024): New Trends in Qualitative Research; e1116New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 20 Núm. 4 (2024): New Trends in Qualitative Research; e1116New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 20 N.º 4 (2024): New Trends in Qualitative Research; e11162184-7770reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPspahttps://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/1116https://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/1116/1063Copyright (c) 2024 New Trends in Qualitative Researchinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessReyes Flores, Luis GerardoMejía Rivera, Kevin Arnaldo2024-12-01T10:10:51Zoai:ojs.publi.ludomedia.org:article/1116Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-12-01T10:10:51Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION INDEXED IN SCOPUS
El INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL EN LA INVESTIGACIÓN CUALITATIVA: ANÁLISIS BIBLIOMÉTRICO DE LA PRODUCCIÓN CIENTÍFICA INDIZADA EN SCOPUS
title ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION INDEXED IN SCOPUS
spellingShingle ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION INDEXED IN SCOPUS
Reyes Flores, Luis Gerardo
Bibliometric Analysis, Artificial Intelligence, Qualitative Research, Scopus
title_short ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION INDEXED IN SCOPUS
title_full ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION INDEXED IN SCOPUS
title_fullStr ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION INDEXED IN SCOPUS
title_full_unstemmed ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION INDEXED IN SCOPUS
title_sort ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION INDEXED IN SCOPUS
author Reyes Flores, Luis Gerardo
author_facet Reyes Flores, Luis Gerardo
Mejía Rivera, Kevin Arnaldo
author_role author
author2 Mejía Rivera, Kevin Arnaldo
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Reyes Flores, Luis Gerardo
Mejía Rivera, Kevin Arnaldo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bibliometric Analysis, Artificial Intelligence, Qualitative Research, Scopus
topic Bibliometric Analysis, Artificial Intelligence, Qualitative Research, Scopus
description The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in research has shown a growing trend in recent years, gaining significant attention from the scientific community compared to other techniques and software for information analysis. Objective to conduct an analysis of the main trends in the use of AI in qualitative research to characterize how AI is being employed in such scientific production. Methods involved a bibliometric analysis of scientific articles indexed in Scopus, using the VosViewer tool, followed by a conventional analysis of data grouped by type, volume of articles, citations, and their respective dating. Results identified four clusters; the first one concentrates 161 occurrences and a score of 572 in its relationship strength. Meanwhile, the second cluster recorded 144 occurrences and a score of 1004 in its relationship strength. Clusters 3 and 4 present lower relationship strength scores. Cluster 1 stands out because it presents the highest number of occurrences linked to the use of AI as the methodology used in the analyzed research. Characterization shows that research oriented towards knowledge production (pure research) surpasses research with an innovation component, representing only one-third of the total. The citation volume of the former also exceeds that of the latter. Additionally, it was observed that the fields of Computer Science and Medicine are the most prominent in this topic. Conclusions AI applied to qualitative research constitutes an increasingly common tool. Three key factors stand out in the use of AI in qualitative research: as a strategy to automate decision-making, to enhance human action, and to investigate as an effect of external factors.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-11-25
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.20.4.2024.e1116
https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.20.4.2024.e1116
url https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.20.4.2024.e1116
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/1116
https://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/1116/1063
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 New Trends in Qualitative Research
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 New Trends in Qualitative Research
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ludomedia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ludomedia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 20 No. 4 (2024): New Trends in Qualitative Research; e1116
New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 20 Núm. 4 (2024): New Trends in Qualitative Research; e1116
New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 20 N.º 4 (2024): New Trends in Qualitative Research; e1116
2184-7770
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mluisa.alvim@gmail.com
_version_ 1817549884347121664