Cohabitation and romantic relationship quality among Portuguese lesbian, gay and heterosexual individuals

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues, D. L.
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Lopes, D., Prada, M.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/17077
Resumo: Lesbian and gay (LG) individuals are perceived as having poorer relationship functioning than heterosexual individuals, but this negative appraisal is not translated into actual relationship experiences. Indeed, relationship quality outcomes do not vary according to sexual orientation. Cohabitation status may play an important role, because it symbolizes relationship commitment and intimacy particularly for LG individuals. A cross-sectional study (N = 425, 52.9% women; Mage = 28.38, SD = 6.89) with romantically involved LG (38.4%) and heterosexual (61.6%) individuals examined how cohabitation was associated with relationship quality outcomes. To isolate the role of cohabitation, cohabiting individuals were compared according to relationship legal status. Results showed that cohabiting (vs. non-cohabiting) LG individuals were more committed, invested and satisfied, but those who legalized (vs. did not legalize) their union were only more committed. Among heterosexual individuals, no differences were observed. Furthermore, LG (vs. heterosexual) individuals were overall more committed, satisfied and invested when cohabiting with their partner (especially in legalized unions), whereas heterosexual (vs. LG) individuals were more committed in non-cohabiting relationships. No other differences were found. This suggests that cohabitation may be used by LG individuals as a strategy to strengthen relationship quality, and that legal recognition further increases relationship commitment.
id RCAP_11fe43205e099677e1e44e5c5543ce64
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/17077
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str
spelling Cohabitation and romantic relationship quality among Portuguese lesbian, gay and heterosexual individualsCohabitationCommitmentLesbian and gay individualsPortuguese contextInvestment modelLesbian and gay (LG) individuals are perceived as having poorer relationship functioning than heterosexual individuals, but this negative appraisal is not translated into actual relationship experiences. Indeed, relationship quality outcomes do not vary according to sexual orientation. Cohabitation status may play an important role, because it symbolizes relationship commitment and intimacy particularly for LG individuals. A cross-sectional study (N = 425, 52.9% women; Mage = 28.38, SD = 6.89) with romantically involved LG (38.4%) and heterosexual (61.6%) individuals examined how cohabitation was associated with relationship quality outcomes. To isolate the role of cohabitation, cohabiting individuals were compared according to relationship legal status. Results showed that cohabiting (vs. non-cohabiting) LG individuals were more committed, invested and satisfied, but those who legalized (vs. did not legalize) their union were only more committed. Among heterosexual individuals, no differences were observed. Furthermore, LG (vs. heterosexual) individuals were overall more committed, satisfied and invested when cohabiting with their partner (especially in legalized unions), whereas heterosexual (vs. LG) individuals were more committed in non-cohabiting relationships. No other differences were found. This suggests that cohabitation may be used by LG individuals as a strategy to strengthen relationship quality, and that legal recognition further increases relationship commitment.Springer US2019-01-17T12:18:02Z2019-07-17T00:00:00Z2019-01-01T00:00:00Z20192019-03-13T11:49:49Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/17077eng1868-988410.1007/s13178-018-0343-zRodrigues, D. L.Lopes, D.Prada, M.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-25T17:46:00ZPortal AgregadorONG
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cohabitation and romantic relationship quality among Portuguese lesbian, gay and heterosexual individuals
title Cohabitation and romantic relationship quality among Portuguese lesbian, gay and heterosexual individuals
spellingShingle Cohabitation and romantic relationship quality among Portuguese lesbian, gay and heterosexual individuals
Rodrigues, D. L.
Cohabitation
Commitment
Lesbian and gay individuals
Portuguese context
Investment model
title_short Cohabitation and romantic relationship quality among Portuguese lesbian, gay and heterosexual individuals
title_full Cohabitation and romantic relationship quality among Portuguese lesbian, gay and heterosexual individuals
title_fullStr Cohabitation and romantic relationship quality among Portuguese lesbian, gay and heterosexual individuals
title_full_unstemmed Cohabitation and romantic relationship quality among Portuguese lesbian, gay and heterosexual individuals
title_sort Cohabitation and romantic relationship quality among Portuguese lesbian, gay and heterosexual individuals
author Rodrigues, D. L.
author_facet Rodrigues, D. L.
Lopes, D.
Prada, M.
author_role author
author2 Lopes, D.
Prada, M.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodrigues, D. L.
Lopes, D.
Prada, M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cohabitation
Commitment
Lesbian and gay individuals
Portuguese context
Investment model
topic Cohabitation
Commitment
Lesbian and gay individuals
Portuguese context
Investment model
description Lesbian and gay (LG) individuals are perceived as having poorer relationship functioning than heterosexual individuals, but this negative appraisal is not translated into actual relationship experiences. Indeed, relationship quality outcomes do not vary according to sexual orientation. Cohabitation status may play an important role, because it symbolizes relationship commitment and intimacy particularly for LG individuals. A cross-sectional study (N = 425, 52.9% women; Mage = 28.38, SD = 6.89) with romantically involved LG (38.4%) and heterosexual (61.6%) individuals examined how cohabitation was associated with relationship quality outcomes. To isolate the role of cohabitation, cohabiting individuals were compared according to relationship legal status. Results showed that cohabiting (vs. non-cohabiting) LG individuals were more committed, invested and satisfied, but those who legalized (vs. did not legalize) their union were only more committed. Among heterosexual individuals, no differences were observed. Furthermore, LG (vs. heterosexual) individuals were overall more committed, satisfied and invested when cohabiting with their partner (especially in legalized unions), whereas heterosexual (vs. LG) individuals were more committed in non-cohabiting relationships. No other differences were found. This suggests that cohabitation may be used by LG individuals as a strategy to strengthen relationship quality, and that legal recognition further increases relationship commitment.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-17T12:18:02Z
2019-07-17T00:00:00Z
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
2019
2019-03-13T11:49:49Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/17077
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/17077
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1868-9884
10.1007/s13178-018-0343-z
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer US
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer US
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1777304043294556160