Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: short-term outcomes

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gil, Inês Campos
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Rama, Nuno, Parente, Diana, Sales, Inês, Alves, Paulo, Clara, Paulo, Amado, Sandra, Coelho, Miguel, Faria, Vítor
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/3906
Resumo: Background: Recently, there has been a growing enthusiasm in developing new techniques of intracorporeal anastomosis following laparoscopic colectomy, which are more challenging than extracorporeal techniques. However, the evidence is still lacking regarding the outcomes’ comparison of both procedures. Methods: We designed a retrospective study comparing intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis following laparoscopic right colectomy. A total of 115 consecutive patients operated for right colon disease were identified, from September 1st 2014 to May 31st 2017. Patient demographics included age, gender, ASA score, past abdominal surgery, anticoagulant and steroid therapy, Diabetes Mellitus and preoperative diagnosis. The analysed outcomes included length of stay, operative time, blood loss, extraction site, postoperative complications (ileus, anastomotic failure and surgical site infection), reoperation rate, readmission rate and 30-day mortality. Results: The extracorporeal group included 84 and the intracorporeal group 31 patients. The intracorporeal group had less surgical site infections (3,2% versus 27,4%, p<0,05). There were no statistically significant differences in operative time, blood loss, ileus, anastomotic failure or mortality. Conclusion: Our study reveals similar outcomes for both intra- and extracorporeal anastomosis following laparoscopic right colectomy. Therefore, intracorporeal anastomosis seems to be a feasible and safe technique in the hands of experienced laparoscopic colorectal surgeons.
id RCAP_121b83ada940bc413d2f5bb1537cc07a
oai_identifier_str oai:iconline.ipleiria.pt:10400.8/3906
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: short-term outcomesLaparoscopyColectomySurgical anastomosisRetrospective studyBackground: Recently, there has been a growing enthusiasm in developing new techniques of intracorporeal anastomosis following laparoscopic colectomy, which are more challenging than extracorporeal techniques. However, the evidence is still lacking regarding the outcomes’ comparison of both procedures. Methods: We designed a retrospective study comparing intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis following laparoscopic right colectomy. A total of 115 consecutive patients operated for right colon disease were identified, from September 1st 2014 to May 31st 2017. Patient demographics included age, gender, ASA score, past abdominal surgery, anticoagulant and steroid therapy, Diabetes Mellitus and preoperative diagnosis. The analysed outcomes included length of stay, operative time, blood loss, extraction site, postoperative complications (ileus, anastomotic failure and surgical site infection), reoperation rate, readmission rate and 30-day mortality. Results: The extracorporeal group included 84 and the intracorporeal group 31 patients. The intracorporeal group had less surgical site infections (3,2% versus 27,4%, p<0,05). There were no statistically significant differences in operative time, blood loss, ileus, anastomotic failure or mortality. Conclusion: Our study reveals similar outcomes for both intra- and extracorporeal anastomosis following laparoscopic right colectomy. Therefore, intracorporeal anastomosis seems to be a feasible and safe technique in the hands of experienced laparoscopic colorectal surgeons.IC-OnlineGil, Inês CamposRama, NunoParente, DianaSales, InêsAlves, PauloClara, PauloAmado, SandraCoelho, MiguelFaria, Vítor2019-04-12T16:13:22Z2018-022018-02-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/3906eng2559-723X10.21614/sgo-23-1-71info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-17T15:48:10Zoai:iconline.ipleiria.pt:10400.8/3906Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:47:54.488206Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: short-term outcomes
title Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: short-term outcomes
spellingShingle Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: short-term outcomes
Gil, Inês Campos
Laparoscopy
Colectomy
Surgical anastomosis
Retrospective study
title_short Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: short-term outcomes
title_full Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: short-term outcomes
title_fullStr Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: short-term outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: short-term outcomes
title_sort Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: short-term outcomes
author Gil, Inês Campos
author_facet Gil, Inês Campos
Rama, Nuno
Parente, Diana
Sales, Inês
Alves, Paulo
Clara, Paulo
Amado, Sandra
Coelho, Miguel
Faria, Vítor
author_role author
author2 Rama, Nuno
Parente, Diana
Sales, Inês
Alves, Paulo
Clara, Paulo
Amado, Sandra
Coelho, Miguel
Faria, Vítor
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv IC-Online
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gil, Inês Campos
Rama, Nuno
Parente, Diana
Sales, Inês
Alves, Paulo
Clara, Paulo
Amado, Sandra
Coelho, Miguel
Faria, Vítor
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Laparoscopy
Colectomy
Surgical anastomosis
Retrospective study
topic Laparoscopy
Colectomy
Surgical anastomosis
Retrospective study
description Background: Recently, there has been a growing enthusiasm in developing new techniques of intracorporeal anastomosis following laparoscopic colectomy, which are more challenging than extracorporeal techniques. However, the evidence is still lacking regarding the outcomes’ comparison of both procedures. Methods: We designed a retrospective study comparing intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis following laparoscopic right colectomy. A total of 115 consecutive patients operated for right colon disease were identified, from September 1st 2014 to May 31st 2017. Patient demographics included age, gender, ASA score, past abdominal surgery, anticoagulant and steroid therapy, Diabetes Mellitus and preoperative diagnosis. The analysed outcomes included length of stay, operative time, blood loss, extraction site, postoperative complications (ileus, anastomotic failure and surgical site infection), reoperation rate, readmission rate and 30-day mortality. Results: The extracorporeal group included 84 and the intracorporeal group 31 patients. The intracorporeal group had less surgical site infections (3,2% versus 27,4%, p<0,05). There were no statistically significant differences in operative time, blood loss, ileus, anastomotic failure or mortality. Conclusion: Our study reveals similar outcomes for both intra- and extracorporeal anastomosis following laparoscopic right colectomy. Therefore, intracorporeal anastomosis seems to be a feasible and safe technique in the hands of experienced laparoscopic colorectal surgeons.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-02
2018-02-01T00:00:00Z
2019-04-12T16:13:22Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/3906
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/3906
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2559-723X
10.21614/sgo-23-1-71
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136972801835008