Inconsistent reporting of life experiences: What people think and how they explain it?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Azevedo,Vanessa
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Martins,Carla, Carvalho,Margarida, Maia,Ângela
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0870-82312021000200199
Resumo: Abstract Assessment of life experiences relies mainly on cross-sectional retrospective design, despite the concerns regarding inconsistent reports. Studies suggest that some individuals change their answers when asked repeatedly, but common opinions underlying this behaviour remain unknown. Our study explored personal perceptions regarding inconsistent reporting and identified associated reasons including individual, experiences-related, and design-related characteristics. Seventy-two individuals, enrolled in a longitudinal study about life experiences, answered a measure about general perceptions and involved reasons. Participants seemed to be aware that inconsistent reporting is a common behaviour, which highly impact on research. A cluster analysis revealed two clusters (i.e., variables involved versus not involved). Most disagreed that sociodemographic variables influence inconsistency, whereas memory, mood, valence, impact, mode of data collection, and interviewer features were pointed as key-variables. Our results suggest that inconsistent reporting is not straightforward and it is probably rooted in a varied and complex set of variables.
id RCAP_12ec66b4851d12c4d9d96cfda4c56c15
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0870-82312021000200199
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Inconsistent reporting of life experiences: What people think and how they explain it?AdultsLife eventsReliabilityReporting practicesRetrospective assessment.Abstract Assessment of life experiences relies mainly on cross-sectional retrospective design, despite the concerns regarding inconsistent reports. Studies suggest that some individuals change their answers when asked repeatedly, but common opinions underlying this behaviour remain unknown. Our study explored personal perceptions regarding inconsistent reporting and identified associated reasons including individual, experiences-related, and design-related characteristics. Seventy-two individuals, enrolled in a longitudinal study about life experiences, answered a measure about general perceptions and involved reasons. Participants seemed to be aware that inconsistent reporting is a common behaviour, which highly impact on research. A cluster analysis revealed two clusters (i.e., variables involved versus not involved). Most disagreed that sociodemographic variables influence inconsistency, whereas memory, mood, valence, impact, mode of data collection, and interviewer features were pointed as key-variables. Our results suggest that inconsistent reporting is not straightforward and it is probably rooted in a varied and complex set of variables.ISPA-Instituto Universitário2021-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0870-82312021000200199Análise Psicológica v.39 n.2 2021reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0870-82312021000200199Azevedo,VanessaMartins,CarlaCarvalho,MargaridaMaia,Ângelainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:00:58Zoai:scielo:S0870-82312021000200199Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:16:37.889919Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Inconsistent reporting of life experiences: What people think and how they explain it?
title Inconsistent reporting of life experiences: What people think and how they explain it?
spellingShingle Inconsistent reporting of life experiences: What people think and how they explain it?
Azevedo,Vanessa
Adults
Life events
Reliability
Reporting practices
Retrospective assessment.
title_short Inconsistent reporting of life experiences: What people think and how they explain it?
title_full Inconsistent reporting of life experiences: What people think and how they explain it?
title_fullStr Inconsistent reporting of life experiences: What people think and how they explain it?
title_full_unstemmed Inconsistent reporting of life experiences: What people think and how they explain it?
title_sort Inconsistent reporting of life experiences: What people think and how they explain it?
author Azevedo,Vanessa
author_facet Azevedo,Vanessa
Martins,Carla
Carvalho,Margarida
Maia,Ângela
author_role author
author2 Martins,Carla
Carvalho,Margarida
Maia,Ângela
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Azevedo,Vanessa
Martins,Carla
Carvalho,Margarida
Maia,Ângela
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Adults
Life events
Reliability
Reporting practices
Retrospective assessment.
topic Adults
Life events
Reliability
Reporting practices
Retrospective assessment.
description Abstract Assessment of life experiences relies mainly on cross-sectional retrospective design, despite the concerns regarding inconsistent reports. Studies suggest that some individuals change their answers when asked repeatedly, but common opinions underlying this behaviour remain unknown. Our study explored personal perceptions regarding inconsistent reporting and identified associated reasons including individual, experiences-related, and design-related characteristics. Seventy-two individuals, enrolled in a longitudinal study about life experiences, answered a measure about general perceptions and involved reasons. Participants seemed to be aware that inconsistent reporting is a common behaviour, which highly impact on research. A cluster analysis revealed two clusters (i.e., variables involved versus not involved). Most disagreed that sociodemographic variables influence inconsistency, whereas memory, mood, valence, impact, mode of data collection, and interviewer features were pointed as key-variables. Our results suggest that inconsistent reporting is not straightforward and it is probably rooted in a varied and complex set of variables.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0870-82312021000200199
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0870-82312021000200199
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0870-82312021000200199
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ISPA-Instituto Universitário
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ISPA-Instituto Universitário
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Análise Psicológica v.39 n.2 2021
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137262726807552