Inconsistent reporting of life experiences: What people think and how they explain it?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0870-82312021000200199 |
Resumo: | Abstract Assessment of life experiences relies mainly on cross-sectional retrospective design, despite the concerns regarding inconsistent reports. Studies suggest that some individuals change their answers when asked repeatedly, but common opinions underlying this behaviour remain unknown. Our study explored personal perceptions regarding inconsistent reporting and identified associated reasons including individual, experiences-related, and design-related characteristics. Seventy-two individuals, enrolled in a longitudinal study about life experiences, answered a measure about general perceptions and involved reasons. Participants seemed to be aware that inconsistent reporting is a common behaviour, which highly impact on research. A cluster analysis revealed two clusters (i.e., variables involved versus not involved). Most disagreed that sociodemographic variables influence inconsistency, whereas memory, mood, valence, impact, mode of data collection, and interviewer features were pointed as key-variables. Our results suggest that inconsistent reporting is not straightforward and it is probably rooted in a varied and complex set of variables. |
id |
RCAP_12ec66b4851d12c4d9d96cfda4c56c15 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0870-82312021000200199 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Inconsistent reporting of life experiences: What people think and how they explain it?AdultsLife eventsReliabilityReporting practicesRetrospective assessment.Abstract Assessment of life experiences relies mainly on cross-sectional retrospective design, despite the concerns regarding inconsistent reports. Studies suggest that some individuals change their answers when asked repeatedly, but common opinions underlying this behaviour remain unknown. Our study explored personal perceptions regarding inconsistent reporting and identified associated reasons including individual, experiences-related, and design-related characteristics. Seventy-two individuals, enrolled in a longitudinal study about life experiences, answered a measure about general perceptions and involved reasons. Participants seemed to be aware that inconsistent reporting is a common behaviour, which highly impact on research. A cluster analysis revealed two clusters (i.e., variables involved versus not involved). Most disagreed that sociodemographic variables influence inconsistency, whereas memory, mood, valence, impact, mode of data collection, and interviewer features were pointed as key-variables. Our results suggest that inconsistent reporting is not straightforward and it is probably rooted in a varied and complex set of variables.ISPA-Instituto Universitário2021-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0870-82312021000200199Análise Psicológica v.39 n.2 2021reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0870-82312021000200199Azevedo,VanessaMartins,CarlaCarvalho,MargaridaMaia,Ângelainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:00:58Zoai:scielo:S0870-82312021000200199Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:16:37.889919Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Inconsistent reporting of life experiences: What people think and how they explain it? |
title |
Inconsistent reporting of life experiences: What people think and how they explain it? |
spellingShingle |
Inconsistent reporting of life experiences: What people think and how they explain it? Azevedo,Vanessa Adults Life events Reliability Reporting practices Retrospective assessment. |
title_short |
Inconsistent reporting of life experiences: What people think and how they explain it? |
title_full |
Inconsistent reporting of life experiences: What people think and how they explain it? |
title_fullStr |
Inconsistent reporting of life experiences: What people think and how they explain it? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Inconsistent reporting of life experiences: What people think and how they explain it? |
title_sort |
Inconsistent reporting of life experiences: What people think and how they explain it? |
author |
Azevedo,Vanessa |
author_facet |
Azevedo,Vanessa Martins,Carla Carvalho,Margarida Maia,Ângela |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Martins,Carla Carvalho,Margarida Maia,Ângela |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Azevedo,Vanessa Martins,Carla Carvalho,Margarida Maia,Ângela |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Adults Life events Reliability Reporting practices Retrospective assessment. |
topic |
Adults Life events Reliability Reporting practices Retrospective assessment. |
description |
Abstract Assessment of life experiences relies mainly on cross-sectional retrospective design, despite the concerns regarding inconsistent reports. Studies suggest that some individuals change their answers when asked repeatedly, but common opinions underlying this behaviour remain unknown. Our study explored personal perceptions regarding inconsistent reporting and identified associated reasons including individual, experiences-related, and design-related characteristics. Seventy-two individuals, enrolled in a longitudinal study about life experiences, answered a measure about general perceptions and involved reasons. Participants seemed to be aware that inconsistent reporting is a common behaviour, which highly impact on research. A cluster analysis revealed two clusters (i.e., variables involved versus not involved). Most disagreed that sociodemographic variables influence inconsistency, whereas memory, mood, valence, impact, mode of data collection, and interviewer features were pointed as key-variables. Our results suggest that inconsistent reporting is not straightforward and it is probably rooted in a varied and complex set of variables. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0870-82312021000200199 |
url |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0870-82312021000200199 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0870-82312021000200199 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ISPA-Instituto Universitário |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ISPA-Instituto Universitário |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Análise Psicológica v.39 n.2 2021 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137262726807552 |