Turnover dependent phenotypic simulation: a quantitative constraint-based simulation method that accommodates all main strain design strategies

• Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Rui Miguel Pinheiro Silva
• Data de Publicação: 2019
• Outros Autores: Vilaça, P., Maia, Paulo, Nielsen, Jens, Rocha, I.
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
• Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/62535
• topic: Genome-scale models; Metabolic engineering; Metabolite turnovers; Network rigidity; Phenotype simulation; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Ciências Médicas::Biotecnologia Médica; Engenharia e Tecnologia::Biotecnologia Industrial; Science & Technology

The uncertain relationship between genotype and phenotype can make strain engineering an arduous trial and error process. To identify promising gene targets faster, constraint-based modelling methodologies are often used, although they remain limited in their predictive power. Even though the search for gene knock-outs is fairly established in constraint-based modelling, most strain design methods still model gene up/down-regulations by forcing the corresponding flux values to fixed levels without taking in consideration the availability of resources. Here, we present a constraint-based algorithm, the Turnover Dependent Phenotypic Simulation (TDPS) that quantitatively simulates phenotypes in a resource conscious manner. Unlike other available algorithms, TDPS does not force flux values and considers resource availability, using metabolite production turnovers as an indicator of metabolite abundance. TDPS can simulate up-regulation of metabolic reactions as well as the introduction of heterologous genes, alongside gene deletion and down-regulation scenarios. TDPS simulations were validated using engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains available in the literature by comparing the simulated and experimental production yields of the target metabolite. For many of the strains evaluated, the experimental production yields were within the simulated intervals and the relative strain performance could be predicted with TDPS. However, the algorithm failed to predict some of the production changes observed experimentally, suggesting that further improvements are necessary. The results also showed that TDPS may be helpful in finding metabolic bottlenecks, but further experiments would be required to confirm these findings.