Husbands' and wives' discordant self-reports on couple-level variables: implications for data analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Amorim, M
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Silva, S, Severo, M, Kelly-Irving, M, Samorinha, C, Alves, E
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/154486
Resumo: Background: Using the couple as unit of analysis raises methodological challenges. This study aims to discuss the appropriate proxy to use in statistical analyses when couples provide discordant answers on the following couple-level variables: household monthly income and length of marital relationship. Methods: During 12 months (July 2013–June 2014), parents of very preterm infants admitted at all level III Neonatal Intensive Care Units of the North of Portugal were consecutively and systematically invited to participate in this study. Mothers and fathers were surveyed separately, 15 to 22 days after birth. In the current analysis, 82 couples living in the same household were included. A socioeconomic position factor score was computed through a principal component analysis. To seek the most appropriate proxy of the couple's value, the association between the individual answers and the summary measures of couple-level variables, and the factor's score was estimated using generalized linear models. Results: Almost 40% of couples gave discordant answers about household monthly income [weighted kappa = 0.68 (95% confidence interval: 0.58–0.79)], with no association with sex. Approximately 19% of couples disagreed regarding the length of marital relationship [weighted kappa = 0.95 (95% confidence interval: 0.92–0.98)], with men declaring longer relationships. No associations were observed between women's and men's answers or the summary measures with the socioeconomic position score. Conclusions: Suggestions regarding how to handle the methodological problems related with spousal discrepancies include the collection of individual variables through separate interviews alongside couple-level variables using joint interviews.
id RCAP_14e1ed47314cce02d2674c2b28b58c5e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/154486
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Husbands' and wives' discordant self-reports on couple-level variables: implications for data analysisBackground: Using the couple as unit of analysis raises methodological challenges. This study aims to discuss the appropriate proxy to use in statistical analyses when couples provide discordant answers on the following couple-level variables: household monthly income and length of marital relationship. Methods: During 12 months (July 2013–June 2014), parents of very preterm infants admitted at all level III Neonatal Intensive Care Units of the North of Portugal were consecutively and systematically invited to participate in this study. Mothers and fathers were surveyed separately, 15 to 22 days after birth. In the current analysis, 82 couples living in the same household were included. A socioeconomic position factor score was computed through a principal component analysis. To seek the most appropriate proxy of the couple's value, the association between the individual answers and the summary measures of couple-level variables, and the factor's score was estimated using generalized linear models. Results: Almost 40% of couples gave discordant answers about household monthly income [weighted kappa = 0.68 (95% confidence interval: 0.58–0.79)], with no association with sex. Approximately 19% of couples disagreed regarding the length of marital relationship [weighted kappa = 0.95 (95% confidence interval: 0.92–0.98)], with men declaring longer relationships. No associations were observed between women's and men's answers or the summary measures with the socioeconomic position score. Conclusions: Suggestions regarding how to handle the methodological problems related with spousal discrepancies include the collection of individual variables through separate interviews alongside couple-level variables using joint interviews.Wolters Kluwer Health20192019-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/154486eng2444-866410.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000053Amorim, MSilva, SSevero, MKelly-Irving, MSamorinha, CAlves, Einfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-29T14:56:19Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/154486Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T00:12:00.587886Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Husbands' and wives' discordant self-reports on couple-level variables: implications for data analysis
title Husbands' and wives' discordant self-reports on couple-level variables: implications for data analysis
spellingShingle Husbands' and wives' discordant self-reports on couple-level variables: implications for data analysis
Amorim, M
title_short Husbands' and wives' discordant self-reports on couple-level variables: implications for data analysis
title_full Husbands' and wives' discordant self-reports on couple-level variables: implications for data analysis
title_fullStr Husbands' and wives' discordant self-reports on couple-level variables: implications for data analysis
title_full_unstemmed Husbands' and wives' discordant self-reports on couple-level variables: implications for data analysis
title_sort Husbands' and wives' discordant self-reports on couple-level variables: implications for data analysis
author Amorim, M
author_facet Amorim, M
Silva, S
Severo, M
Kelly-Irving, M
Samorinha, C
Alves, E
author_role author
author2 Silva, S
Severo, M
Kelly-Irving, M
Samorinha, C
Alves, E
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Amorim, M
Silva, S
Severo, M
Kelly-Irving, M
Samorinha, C
Alves, E
description Background: Using the couple as unit of analysis raises methodological challenges. This study aims to discuss the appropriate proxy to use in statistical analyses when couples provide discordant answers on the following couple-level variables: household monthly income and length of marital relationship. Methods: During 12 months (July 2013–June 2014), parents of very preterm infants admitted at all level III Neonatal Intensive Care Units of the North of Portugal were consecutively and systematically invited to participate in this study. Mothers and fathers were surveyed separately, 15 to 22 days after birth. In the current analysis, 82 couples living in the same household were included. A socioeconomic position factor score was computed through a principal component analysis. To seek the most appropriate proxy of the couple's value, the association between the individual answers and the summary measures of couple-level variables, and the factor's score was estimated using generalized linear models. Results: Almost 40% of couples gave discordant answers about household monthly income [weighted kappa = 0.68 (95% confidence interval: 0.58–0.79)], with no association with sex. Approximately 19% of couples disagreed regarding the length of marital relationship [weighted kappa = 0.95 (95% confidence interval: 0.92–0.98)], with men declaring longer relationships. No associations were observed between women's and men's answers or the summary measures with the socioeconomic position score. Conclusions: Suggestions regarding how to handle the methodological problems related with spousal discrepancies include the collection of individual variables through separate interviews alongside couple-level variables using joint interviews.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10216/154486
url https://hdl.handle.net/10216/154486
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2444-8664
10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000053
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wolters Kluwer Health
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wolters Kluwer Health
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136042609016832