Risk and vulnerability management, project agility and resilience: a comparative analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm090401 |
Resumo: | The main objective of this paper is to present a critical analysis of the project management literature on four concepts; risk management, vulnerability management, project agility and project resilience. The goal is to understand the strengths and weaknesses of these concepts to deal with disruptive events through the development of a conceptual framework that captures their differences and convergences. Therefore, a review of recent literature from international journals, specialized mainly in project risk management, vulnerability management, project agility, and project resilience has been conducted. A systematic literature review is adopted to compare the four key concepts of this study and to draw conclusions. A case from the information technology field is used to better illustrate the comparison.Results from this study show that risk management and vulnerability management are proactive concepts focusing on the management of known events or actions. Alternatively, project agility is a reactive concept that aims to adapt to changes, but not necessarily disruptive events. Project resilience is a mix concept – proactive and reactive – focusing on recovering from known and unknown disruptive events. In addition, this comparative analysis and the conceptual framework developed can be used to exploit future areas of research and exhibit new opportunities where project management best practices can be improved to deal with disruptive events. |
id |
RCAP_15ce89d0dbaccaffb9fdf16148136bfa |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:journals.uminho.pt:article/3788 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Risk and vulnerability management, project agility and resilience: a comparative analysisrisk managementvulnerability managementproject agilityproject resiliencecritical analysisThe main objective of this paper is to present a critical analysis of the project management literature on four concepts; risk management, vulnerability management, project agility and project resilience. The goal is to understand the strengths and weaknesses of these concepts to deal with disruptive events through the development of a conceptual framework that captures their differences and convergences. Therefore, a review of recent literature from international journals, specialized mainly in project risk management, vulnerability management, project agility, and project resilience has been conducted. A systematic literature review is adopted to compare the four key concepts of this study and to draw conclusions. A case from the information technology field is used to better illustrate the comparison.Results from this study show that risk management and vulnerability management are proactive concepts focusing on the management of known events or actions. Alternatively, project agility is a reactive concept that aims to adapt to changes, but not necessarily disruptive events. Project resilience is a mix concept – proactive and reactive – focusing on recovering from known and unknown disruptive events. In addition, this comparative analysis and the conceptual framework developed can be used to exploit future areas of research and exhibit new opportunities where project management best practices can be improved to deal with disruptive events.UMinho Editora2022-01-26info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm090401https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm090401International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management; Vol. 9 N.º 4 (2021); 5-21International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management; Vol. 9 No. 4 (2021); 5-212182-7788reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/ijispm/article/view/3788https://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/ijispm/article/view/3788/3847Rahi, KhalilBourgault, MarioPreece, Christopherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-03-23T11:57:46Zoai:journals.uminho.pt:article/3788Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:45:15.384077Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Risk and vulnerability management, project agility and resilience: a comparative analysis |
title |
Risk and vulnerability management, project agility and resilience: a comparative analysis |
spellingShingle |
Risk and vulnerability management, project agility and resilience: a comparative analysis Rahi, Khalil risk management vulnerability management project agility project resilience critical analysis |
title_short |
Risk and vulnerability management, project agility and resilience: a comparative analysis |
title_full |
Risk and vulnerability management, project agility and resilience: a comparative analysis |
title_fullStr |
Risk and vulnerability management, project agility and resilience: a comparative analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Risk and vulnerability management, project agility and resilience: a comparative analysis |
title_sort |
Risk and vulnerability management, project agility and resilience: a comparative analysis |
author |
Rahi, Khalil |
author_facet |
Rahi, Khalil Bourgault, Mario Preece, Christopher |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bourgault, Mario Preece, Christopher |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rahi, Khalil Bourgault, Mario Preece, Christopher |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
risk management vulnerability management project agility project resilience critical analysis |
topic |
risk management vulnerability management project agility project resilience critical analysis |
description |
The main objective of this paper is to present a critical analysis of the project management literature on four concepts; risk management, vulnerability management, project agility and project resilience. The goal is to understand the strengths and weaknesses of these concepts to deal with disruptive events through the development of a conceptual framework that captures their differences and convergences. Therefore, a review of recent literature from international journals, specialized mainly in project risk management, vulnerability management, project agility, and project resilience has been conducted. A systematic literature review is adopted to compare the four key concepts of this study and to draw conclusions. A case from the information technology field is used to better illustrate the comparison.Results from this study show that risk management and vulnerability management are proactive concepts focusing on the management of known events or actions. Alternatively, project agility is a reactive concept that aims to adapt to changes, but not necessarily disruptive events. Project resilience is a mix concept – proactive and reactive – focusing on recovering from known and unknown disruptive events. In addition, this comparative analysis and the conceptual framework developed can be used to exploit future areas of research and exhibit new opportunities where project management best practices can be improved to deal with disruptive events. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-26 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm090401 https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm090401 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm090401 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/ijispm/article/view/3788 https://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/ijispm/article/view/3788/3847 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UMinho Editora |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UMinho Editora |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management; Vol. 9 N.º 4 (2021); 5-21 International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management; Vol. 9 No. 4 (2021); 5-21 2182-7788 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799131537572102144 |