Risk and vulnerability management, project agility and resilience: a comparative analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rahi, Khalil
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Bourgault, Mario, Preece, Christopher
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm090401
Resumo: The main objective of this paper is to present a critical analysis of the project management literature on four concepts; risk management, vulnerability management, project agility and project resilience. The goal is to understand the strengths and weaknesses of these concepts to deal with disruptive events through the development of a conceptual framework that captures their differences and convergences. Therefore, a review of recent literature from international journals, specialized mainly in project risk management, vulnerability management, project agility, and project resilience has been conducted. A systematic literature review is adopted to compare the four key concepts of this study and to draw conclusions. A case from the information technology field is used to better illustrate the comparison.Results from this study show that risk management and vulnerability management are proactive concepts focusing on the management of known events or actions. Alternatively, project agility is a reactive concept that aims to adapt to changes, but not necessarily disruptive events. Project resilience is a mix concept – proactive and reactive – focusing on recovering from known and unknown disruptive events. In addition, this comparative analysis and the conceptual framework developed can be used to exploit future areas of research and exhibit new opportunities where project management best practices can be improved to deal with disruptive events.
id RCAP_15ce89d0dbaccaffb9fdf16148136bfa
oai_identifier_str oai:journals.uminho.pt:article/3788
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Risk and vulnerability management, project agility and resilience: a comparative analysisrisk managementvulnerability managementproject agilityproject resiliencecritical analysisThe main objective of this paper is to present a critical analysis of the project management literature on four concepts; risk management, vulnerability management, project agility and project resilience. The goal is to understand the strengths and weaknesses of these concepts to deal with disruptive events through the development of a conceptual framework that captures their differences and convergences. Therefore, a review of recent literature from international journals, specialized mainly in project risk management, vulnerability management, project agility, and project resilience has been conducted. A systematic literature review is adopted to compare the four key concepts of this study and to draw conclusions. A case from the information technology field is used to better illustrate the comparison.Results from this study show that risk management and vulnerability management are proactive concepts focusing on the management of known events or actions. Alternatively, project agility is a reactive concept that aims to adapt to changes, but not necessarily disruptive events. Project resilience is a mix concept – proactive and reactive – focusing on recovering from known and unknown disruptive events. In addition, this comparative analysis and the conceptual framework developed can be used to exploit future areas of research and exhibit new opportunities where project management best practices can be improved to deal with disruptive events.UMinho Editora2022-01-26info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm090401https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm090401International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management; Vol. 9 N.º 4 (2021); 5-21International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management; Vol. 9 No. 4 (2021); 5-212182-7788reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/ijispm/article/view/3788https://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/ijispm/article/view/3788/3847Rahi, KhalilBourgault, MarioPreece, Christopherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-03-23T11:57:46Zoai:journals.uminho.pt:article/3788Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:45:15.384077Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Risk and vulnerability management, project agility and resilience: a comparative analysis
title Risk and vulnerability management, project agility and resilience: a comparative analysis
spellingShingle Risk and vulnerability management, project agility and resilience: a comparative analysis
Rahi, Khalil
risk management
vulnerability management
project agility
project resilience
critical analysis
title_short Risk and vulnerability management, project agility and resilience: a comparative analysis
title_full Risk and vulnerability management, project agility and resilience: a comparative analysis
title_fullStr Risk and vulnerability management, project agility and resilience: a comparative analysis
title_full_unstemmed Risk and vulnerability management, project agility and resilience: a comparative analysis
title_sort Risk and vulnerability management, project agility and resilience: a comparative analysis
author Rahi, Khalil
author_facet Rahi, Khalil
Bourgault, Mario
Preece, Christopher
author_role author
author2 Bourgault, Mario
Preece, Christopher
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rahi, Khalil
Bourgault, Mario
Preece, Christopher
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv risk management
vulnerability management
project agility
project resilience
critical analysis
topic risk management
vulnerability management
project agility
project resilience
critical analysis
description The main objective of this paper is to present a critical analysis of the project management literature on four concepts; risk management, vulnerability management, project agility and project resilience. The goal is to understand the strengths and weaknesses of these concepts to deal with disruptive events through the development of a conceptual framework that captures their differences and convergences. Therefore, a review of recent literature from international journals, specialized mainly in project risk management, vulnerability management, project agility, and project resilience has been conducted. A systematic literature review is adopted to compare the four key concepts of this study and to draw conclusions. A case from the information technology field is used to better illustrate the comparison.Results from this study show that risk management and vulnerability management are proactive concepts focusing on the management of known events or actions. Alternatively, project agility is a reactive concept that aims to adapt to changes, but not necessarily disruptive events. Project resilience is a mix concept – proactive and reactive – focusing on recovering from known and unknown disruptive events. In addition, this comparative analysis and the conceptual framework developed can be used to exploit future areas of research and exhibit new opportunities where project management best practices can be improved to deal with disruptive events.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-26
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm090401
https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm090401
url https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm090401
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/ijispm/article/view/3788
https://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/ijispm/article/view/3788/3847
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UMinho Editora
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UMinho Editora
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management; Vol. 9 N.º 4 (2021); 5-21
International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management; Vol. 9 No. 4 (2021); 5-21
2182-7788
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131537572102144