Examination and comparison of different methods to model closed loop kinematic chains using Lagrangian formulation with cut joint, clearance joint constraint and elastic joint approaches
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://hdl.handle.net/1822/83056 |
Resumo: | This work aims at presenting, in a comprehensive manner, several approaches to model and simulate closed loop topologies using the classical Lagrangian formulation. One of the great advantages of the Lagrangian approach is its simplicity and easiness of obtaining the equations of motion. However, a critical aspect arises when the mechanical systems include closed loop topologies, since the process of deriving the equations of motion becomes a complex task. The key point of the present study is to convert the closed loop nature into open systems, which ultimately simplifies the modeling process when the Lagrangian formulation is utilized. For this purpose, three different methods are considered, namely those based on the cut joint approach, the clearance joint constraint model, and the elastic joint formulation are used. In the sequel of this process, a slider-crank mechanism is utilized as a demonstrative application example, and the main results are compared with those obtained with the well-established Newton-Euler method for constrained multibody systems. Moreover, this example allows the comparison of the main characteristics and peculiarities of the described approaches. |
id |
RCAP_160ad71036a7766a49de44df4cb4c00b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/83056 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Examination and comparison of different methods to model closed loop kinematic chains using Lagrangian formulation with cut joint, clearance joint constraint and elastic joint approachesNewton-euler methodLagrangian formulationClosed loop kinematic chainsOpen systemsMultibody system dynamicsEngenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia MecânicaScience & TechnologyThis work aims at presenting, in a comprehensive manner, several approaches to model and simulate closed loop topologies using the classical Lagrangian formulation. One of the great advantages of the Lagrangian approach is its simplicity and easiness of obtaining the equations of motion. However, a critical aspect arises when the mechanical systems include closed loop topologies, since the process of deriving the equations of motion becomes a complex task. The key point of the present study is to convert the closed loop nature into open systems, which ultimately simplifies the modeling process when the Lagrangian formulation is utilized. For this purpose, three different methods are considered, namely those based on the cut joint approach, the clearance joint constraint model, and the elastic joint formulation are used. In the sequel of this process, a slider-crank mechanism is utilized as a demonstrative application example, and the main results are compared with those obtained with the well-established Newton-Euler method for constrained multibody systems. Moreover, this example allows the comparison of the main characteristics and peculiarities of the described approaches.This work has been supported by Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, under the national support to R&D units grant, with the reference project UIDB/04436/2020 and UIDP/04436/2020, as well as through IDMEC, under LAETA, project UIDB/50022/2020ElsevierUniversidade do MinhoMarques, FilipeFlores, PauloRoupa, IvoSilva, Miguel T.Lankarani, Hamid M.20212021-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/83056eng0094-114X1873-399910.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104294https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104294info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T11:56:43Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/83056Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:46:20.928585Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Examination and comparison of different methods to model closed loop kinematic chains using Lagrangian formulation with cut joint, clearance joint constraint and elastic joint approaches |
title |
Examination and comparison of different methods to model closed loop kinematic chains using Lagrangian formulation with cut joint, clearance joint constraint and elastic joint approaches |
spellingShingle |
Examination and comparison of different methods to model closed loop kinematic chains using Lagrangian formulation with cut joint, clearance joint constraint and elastic joint approaches Marques, Filipe Newton-euler method Lagrangian formulation Closed loop kinematic chains Open systems Multibody system dynamics Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia Mecânica Science & Technology |
title_short |
Examination and comparison of different methods to model closed loop kinematic chains using Lagrangian formulation with cut joint, clearance joint constraint and elastic joint approaches |
title_full |
Examination and comparison of different methods to model closed loop kinematic chains using Lagrangian formulation with cut joint, clearance joint constraint and elastic joint approaches |
title_fullStr |
Examination and comparison of different methods to model closed loop kinematic chains using Lagrangian formulation with cut joint, clearance joint constraint and elastic joint approaches |
title_full_unstemmed |
Examination and comparison of different methods to model closed loop kinematic chains using Lagrangian formulation with cut joint, clearance joint constraint and elastic joint approaches |
title_sort |
Examination and comparison of different methods to model closed loop kinematic chains using Lagrangian formulation with cut joint, clearance joint constraint and elastic joint approaches |
author |
Marques, Filipe |
author_facet |
Marques, Filipe Flores, Paulo Roupa, Ivo Silva, Miguel T. Lankarani, Hamid M. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Flores, Paulo Roupa, Ivo Silva, Miguel T. Lankarani, Hamid M. |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Minho |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Marques, Filipe Flores, Paulo Roupa, Ivo Silva, Miguel T. Lankarani, Hamid M. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Newton-euler method Lagrangian formulation Closed loop kinematic chains Open systems Multibody system dynamics Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia Mecânica Science & Technology |
topic |
Newton-euler method Lagrangian formulation Closed loop kinematic chains Open systems Multibody system dynamics Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia Mecânica Science & Technology |
description |
This work aims at presenting, in a comprehensive manner, several approaches to model and simulate closed loop topologies using the classical Lagrangian formulation. One of the great advantages of the Lagrangian approach is its simplicity and easiness of obtaining the equations of motion. However, a critical aspect arises when the mechanical systems include closed loop topologies, since the process of deriving the equations of motion becomes a complex task. The key point of the present study is to convert the closed loop nature into open systems, which ultimately simplifies the modeling process when the Lagrangian formulation is utilized. For this purpose, three different methods are considered, namely those based on the cut joint approach, the clearance joint constraint model, and the elastic joint formulation are used. In the sequel of this process, a slider-crank mechanism is utilized as a demonstrative application example, and the main results are compared with those obtained with the well-established Newton-Euler method for constrained multibody systems. Moreover, this example allows the comparison of the main characteristics and peculiarities of the described approaches. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/1822/83056 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/1822/83056 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0094-114X 1873-3999 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104294 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104294 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799132218735460352 |