The experience of programs to promote health in retirement: a systematic review of qualitative evidence

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Loureiro, Helena Maria Almeida Macedo
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Mendes, Aida Maria de Oliveira Cruz, Rodrigues, Rogério Manuel Clemente, Apóstolo, João Luís Alves, Rodrigues, Manuel Alves, Cardoso, Daniela Filipa Batista, Pedreiro, Ana Teresa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.esenfc.pt/?url=BQjSLAjO
Resumo: Background Retirement is a transition that occurs at the conclusion of the work phase of life, after years in which work has played an important role, and this can interfere with every dimension of the human ageing process. It can be seen as an event, as a status or as a process. Independently of these perspectives, intervention programs can promote the health status of individuals and their families during this life transition. Aging is one of the major issues affecting the current public health framework. For many societies there will be an increasing population of older persons leading to an increase the number of people living with chronic diseases and associated morbidity. As such, there is an urgent need to implement strategies that promote health and the quality of life in stage. Objectives The objective of this review was to identify programs that have been implemented with the goal of promoting the health of individuals and their families during their adjustment to retirement and identify the meaningfulness and appropriateness of programs implemented to improve the health status of individuals and families during their adjustment to retirement. Inclusion criteria Types of participants This review considered studies that included individuals newly retired (within five years of retirement) and their families. We did not consider any age range; what was important was the experience of the individual, independent of the age in which this transition occurred. Phenomena of interest This review considered studies that investigated the experiences of individuals and families during the initial retirement period who were subject to programs implemented to improve their health status, excluding programs that had returning to the labor market as a goal. Types of studies This review considered interpretive or critical studies that drew on the experiences of individuals and their families including, but not limited to, designs such as phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, action research and feminist research. In the absence of research studies, other text such as opinion papers and reports were considered. Search strategy The search strategy aimed to find both published and unpublished studies. An initial search of MEDLINE and CINAHL was undertaken followed by an analysis of text words contained in the title and abstract, and of index terms used to describe the article. Using all identified keywords and index terms, another search was then undertaken across all included databases. The reference list of all identified reports and articles was searched for additional studies. Studies published in Portuguese, English and Spanish, and those published from 2000 to 2013 were considered for inclusion. Results The number of potentially relevant studies identified following the search was 567. Of these, seven were excluded as duplicates; of the remaining 560, from the title and abstract assessment, 540 were excluded, and 20 out of the 20 articles were excluded for not fulfilling the inclusion criteria when the full text was read. There were no studies located that met the inclusion criteria of this review. Conclusions There is currently no evidence available to determine the meaningfulness and appropriateness of programs that have been implemented to improve the health status of individuals and families during their adjustment to retirement. According to the conducted analysis, health promotion in retirement is an area which needs scientific and economic investment as there is a lack of evidence that describes programs directed to retirees and their families and that measure the meaningfulness and appropriateness in what concerns their health status.
id RCAP_1775f78ffc1a2a719f047be89cb3a344
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.esenfc.pt:5151
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling The experience of programs to promote health in retirement: a systematic review of qualitative evidencecoursefamilyindividualprogramretirementstrategyBackground Retirement is a transition that occurs at the conclusion of the work phase of life, after years in which work has played an important role, and this can interfere with every dimension of the human ageing process. It can be seen as an event, as a status or as a process. Independently of these perspectives, intervention programs can promote the health status of individuals and their families during this life transition. Aging is one of the major issues affecting the current public health framework. For many societies there will be an increasing population of older persons leading to an increase the number of people living with chronic diseases and associated morbidity. As such, there is an urgent need to implement strategies that promote health and the quality of life in stage. Objectives The objective of this review was to identify programs that have been implemented with the goal of promoting the health of individuals and their families during their adjustment to retirement and identify the meaningfulness and appropriateness of programs implemented to improve the health status of individuals and families during their adjustment to retirement. Inclusion criteria Types of participants This review considered studies that included individuals newly retired (within five years of retirement) and their families. We did not consider any age range; what was important was the experience of the individual, independent of the age in which this transition occurred. Phenomena of interest This review considered studies that investigated the experiences of individuals and families during the initial retirement period who were subject to programs implemented to improve their health status, excluding programs that had returning to the labor market as a goal. Types of studies This review considered interpretive or critical studies that drew on the experiences of individuals and their families including, but not limited to, designs such as phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, action research and feminist research. In the absence of research studies, other text such as opinion papers and reports were considered. Search strategy The search strategy aimed to find both published and unpublished studies. An initial search of MEDLINE and CINAHL was undertaken followed by an analysis of text words contained in the title and abstract, and of index terms used to describe the article. Using all identified keywords and index terms, another search was then undertaken across all included databases. The reference list of all identified reports and articles was searched for additional studies. Studies published in Portuguese, English and Spanish, and those published from 2000 to 2013 were considered for inclusion. Results The number of potentially relevant studies identified following the search was 567. Of these, seven were excluded as duplicates; of the remaining 560, from the title and abstract assessment, 540 were excluded, and 20 out of the 20 articles were excluded for not fulfilling the inclusion criteria when the full text was read. There were no studies located that met the inclusion criteria of this review. Conclusions There is currently no evidence available to determine the meaningfulness and appropriateness of programs that have been implemented to improve the health status of individuals and families during their adjustment to retirement. According to the conducted analysis, health promotion in retirement is an area which needs scientific and economic investment as there is a lack of evidence that describes programs directed to retirees and their families and that measure the meaningfulness and appropriateness in what concerns their health status.2015-05-18info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://repositorio.esenfc.pt/?url=BQjSLAjOenghttp://repositorio.esenfc.pt/?url=BQjSLAjOinfo:doi:10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1754Loureiro, Helena Maria Almeida MacedoMendes, Aida Maria de Oliveira CruzRodrigues, Rogério Manuel ClementeApóstolo, João Luís AlvesRodrigues, Manuel AlvesCardoso, Daniela Filipa BatistaPedreiro, Ana Teresainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2015-05-18T00:00:00Zoai:repositorio.esenfc.pt:5151Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:11:40.404772Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The experience of programs to promote health in retirement: a systematic review of qualitative evidence
title The experience of programs to promote health in retirement: a systematic review of qualitative evidence
spellingShingle The experience of programs to promote health in retirement: a systematic review of qualitative evidence
Loureiro, Helena Maria Almeida Macedo
course
family
individual
program
retirement
strategy
title_short The experience of programs to promote health in retirement: a systematic review of qualitative evidence
title_full The experience of programs to promote health in retirement: a systematic review of qualitative evidence
title_fullStr The experience of programs to promote health in retirement: a systematic review of qualitative evidence
title_full_unstemmed The experience of programs to promote health in retirement: a systematic review of qualitative evidence
title_sort The experience of programs to promote health in retirement: a systematic review of qualitative evidence
author Loureiro, Helena Maria Almeida Macedo
author_facet Loureiro, Helena Maria Almeida Macedo
Mendes, Aida Maria de Oliveira Cruz
Rodrigues, Rogério Manuel Clemente
Apóstolo, João Luís Alves
Rodrigues, Manuel Alves
Cardoso, Daniela Filipa Batista
Pedreiro, Ana Teresa
author_role author
author2 Mendes, Aida Maria de Oliveira Cruz
Rodrigues, Rogério Manuel Clemente
Apóstolo, João Luís Alves
Rodrigues, Manuel Alves
Cardoso, Daniela Filipa Batista
Pedreiro, Ana Teresa
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Loureiro, Helena Maria Almeida Macedo
Mendes, Aida Maria de Oliveira Cruz
Rodrigues, Rogério Manuel Clemente
Apóstolo, João Luís Alves
Rodrigues, Manuel Alves
Cardoso, Daniela Filipa Batista
Pedreiro, Ana Teresa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv course
family
individual
program
retirement
strategy
topic course
family
individual
program
retirement
strategy
description Background Retirement is a transition that occurs at the conclusion of the work phase of life, after years in which work has played an important role, and this can interfere with every dimension of the human ageing process. It can be seen as an event, as a status or as a process. Independently of these perspectives, intervention programs can promote the health status of individuals and their families during this life transition. Aging is one of the major issues affecting the current public health framework. For many societies there will be an increasing population of older persons leading to an increase the number of people living with chronic diseases and associated morbidity. As such, there is an urgent need to implement strategies that promote health and the quality of life in stage. Objectives The objective of this review was to identify programs that have been implemented with the goal of promoting the health of individuals and their families during their adjustment to retirement and identify the meaningfulness and appropriateness of programs implemented to improve the health status of individuals and families during their adjustment to retirement. Inclusion criteria Types of participants This review considered studies that included individuals newly retired (within five years of retirement) and their families. We did not consider any age range; what was important was the experience of the individual, independent of the age in which this transition occurred. Phenomena of interest This review considered studies that investigated the experiences of individuals and families during the initial retirement period who were subject to programs implemented to improve their health status, excluding programs that had returning to the labor market as a goal. Types of studies This review considered interpretive or critical studies that drew on the experiences of individuals and their families including, but not limited to, designs such as phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, action research and feminist research. In the absence of research studies, other text such as opinion papers and reports were considered. Search strategy The search strategy aimed to find both published and unpublished studies. An initial search of MEDLINE and CINAHL was undertaken followed by an analysis of text words contained in the title and abstract, and of index terms used to describe the article. Using all identified keywords and index terms, another search was then undertaken across all included databases. The reference list of all identified reports and articles was searched for additional studies. Studies published in Portuguese, English and Spanish, and those published from 2000 to 2013 were considered for inclusion. Results The number of potentially relevant studies identified following the search was 567. Of these, seven were excluded as duplicates; of the remaining 560, from the title and abstract assessment, 540 were excluded, and 20 out of the 20 articles were excluded for not fulfilling the inclusion criteria when the full text was read. There were no studies located that met the inclusion criteria of this review. Conclusions There is currently no evidence available to determine the meaningfulness and appropriateness of programs that have been implemented to improve the health status of individuals and families during their adjustment to retirement. According to the conducted analysis, health promotion in retirement is an area which needs scientific and economic investment as there is a lack of evidence that describes programs directed to retirees and their families and that measure the meaningfulness and appropriateness in what concerns their health status.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-05-18
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.esenfc.pt/?url=BQjSLAjO
url http://repositorio.esenfc.pt/?url=BQjSLAjO
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.esenfc.pt/?url=BQjSLAjO
info:doi:10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1754
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137217678934016