Strength training to prevent falls in older adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://hdl.handle.net/10216/153772 |
Resumo: | We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effects of strength training (ST), as compared to alternative multimodal or unimodal exercise programs, on the number of falls in older adults (=60 years). Ten databases were consulted (CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, EMBASE, PEDro, PubMed, Scielo, Scopus, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science), without limitations on language or publication date. Eligibility criteria were as follows: RCTs with humans =60 years of age of any gender with one group performing supervised ST and a group performing another type of exercise training, reporting data pertaining falls. Certainty of evidence was assessed with Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Meta-analysis used a random effects model to calculate the risk ratio (RR) for number of falls. Five RCTs with six trials were included (n = 543, 76% women). There was no difference between ST and alternative exercise interventions for falls (RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.77–1.30, p = 0.99). The certainty of evidence was very low. No dose–response relationship could be established. In sum, ST showed comparable RR based on number of falls in older adults when compared to other multimodal or unimodal exercise modalities, but evidence is scarce and heteroge-neous, and additional research is required for more robust conclusions. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020222908. |
id |
RCAP_18e8d24d4a2b611f668f118a748d3353 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/153772 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Strength training to prevent falls in older adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsElderlyFallsPublic healthStrength trainingUnimodal exercise programsWe performed a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effects of strength training (ST), as compared to alternative multimodal or unimodal exercise programs, on the number of falls in older adults (=60 years). Ten databases were consulted (CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, EMBASE, PEDro, PubMed, Scielo, Scopus, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science), without limitations on language or publication date. Eligibility criteria were as follows: RCTs with humans =60 years of age of any gender with one group performing supervised ST and a group performing another type of exercise training, reporting data pertaining falls. Certainty of evidence was assessed with Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Meta-analysis used a random effects model to calculate the risk ratio (RR) for number of falls. Five RCTs with six trials were included (n = 543, 76% women). There was no difference between ST and alternative exercise interventions for falls (RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.77–1.30, p = 0.99). The certainty of evidence was very low. No dose–response relationship could be established. In sum, ST showed comparable RR based on number of falls in older adults when compared to other multimodal or unimodal exercise modalities, but evidence is scarce and heteroge-neous, and additional research is required for more robust conclusions. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020222908.MDPI20212021-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/153772eng2077-038310.3390/jcm10143184Claudino, JGAfonso, JSarvestan, JLanza, MBPennone, JFilho, CACSerrão, JCEspregueira-Mendes, JVasconcelos, ALVAndrade, MPRocha-Rodrigues, SAndrade, RRamirez-Campillo, Rinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-29T15:12:16Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/153772Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T00:18:00.591477Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Strength training to prevent falls in older adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title |
Strength training to prevent falls in older adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
spellingShingle |
Strength training to prevent falls in older adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Claudino, JG Elderly Falls Public health Strength training Unimodal exercise programs |
title_short |
Strength training to prevent falls in older adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full |
Strength training to prevent falls in older adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr |
Strength training to prevent falls in older adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed |
Strength training to prevent falls in older adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort |
Strength training to prevent falls in older adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
author |
Claudino, JG |
author_facet |
Claudino, JG Afonso, J Sarvestan, J Lanza, MB Pennone, J Filho, CAC Serrão, JC Espregueira-Mendes, J Vasconcelos, ALV Andrade, MP Rocha-Rodrigues, S Andrade, R Ramirez-Campillo, R |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Afonso, J Sarvestan, J Lanza, MB Pennone, J Filho, CAC Serrão, JC Espregueira-Mendes, J Vasconcelos, ALV Andrade, MP Rocha-Rodrigues, S Andrade, R Ramirez-Campillo, R |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Claudino, JG Afonso, J Sarvestan, J Lanza, MB Pennone, J Filho, CAC Serrão, JC Espregueira-Mendes, J Vasconcelos, ALV Andrade, MP Rocha-Rodrigues, S Andrade, R Ramirez-Campillo, R |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Elderly Falls Public health Strength training Unimodal exercise programs |
topic |
Elderly Falls Public health Strength training Unimodal exercise programs |
description |
We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effects of strength training (ST), as compared to alternative multimodal or unimodal exercise programs, on the number of falls in older adults (=60 years). Ten databases were consulted (CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, EMBASE, PEDro, PubMed, Scielo, Scopus, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science), without limitations on language or publication date. Eligibility criteria were as follows: RCTs with humans =60 years of age of any gender with one group performing supervised ST and a group performing another type of exercise training, reporting data pertaining falls. Certainty of evidence was assessed with Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Meta-analysis used a random effects model to calculate the risk ratio (RR) for number of falls. Five RCTs with six trials were included (n = 543, 76% women). There was no difference between ST and alternative exercise interventions for falls (RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.77–1.30, p = 0.99). The certainty of evidence was very low. No dose–response relationship could be established. In sum, ST showed comparable RR based on number of falls in older adults when compared to other multimodal or unimodal exercise modalities, but evidence is scarce and heteroge-neous, and additional research is required for more robust conclusions. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020222908. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/10216/153772 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10216/153772 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2077-0383 10.3390/jcm10143184 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MDPI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MDPI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136099501604865 |