Percutaneous coronary intervention in the occluded artery trial: procedural success, hazard, and outcomes over 5 years.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Buller, C
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Rankin, J, Carere, R, Buszman, P, Pfisterer, M, Dzavik, V, Thomas, B, Forman, S, Ruzyllo, W, Mancini, G, Michalis, L, Abreu, G, Lamas, G, Hochman, J
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.10/830
Resumo: BACKGROUND: The Occluded Artery Trial (OAT) was a 2,201-patient randomized clinical trial comparing routine stent-based percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus optimal medical therapy alone in stable myocardial infarction (MI) survivors with persistent infarct-related artery occlusion identified day 3 to 28 post MI. Intent-to-treat analysis showed no difference between strategies with respect to the incidence of new class IV congestive heart failure, MI, or death. The influence of PCI failure, procedural hazard, and crossover on trial results has not been reported. METHODS: Study angiograms were analyzed and adjudicated centrally. Factors associated with PCI failure were examined. Time-to-event analysis using the OAT primary outcome was performed by PCI success status. Landmark analysis (up to and beyond 30 days) partitioned early hazard versus late outcome according to treatment received. RESULTS: Percutaneous coronary intervention was adjudicated successful in >87%. Percutaneous coronary intervention failure rates were similar in US and non-US sites, and did not significantly influence outcome at 60 months (hazard ratio for success vs fail 0.79, 99% CI 0.45-1.40, P = .29). Partitioning of early procedural hazard revealed no late benefit for PCI (hazard ratio for PCI success vs medical therapy alone 1.06, 99% CI 0.75-1.50, P = .66). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous coronary intervention failure and complication rates in the OAT were low. Neither PCI failure nor early procedural hazard substantively influenced the primary trial results.
id RCAP_1a81a4103e0107fe3c67c6888343c49c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.hff.min-saude.pt:10400.10/830
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Percutaneous coronary intervention in the occluded artery trial: procedural success, hazard, and outcomes over 5 years.AngioplastyCoronary angiographyCoronary occlusionMyocardial infarctionBACKGROUND: The Occluded Artery Trial (OAT) was a 2,201-patient randomized clinical trial comparing routine stent-based percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus optimal medical therapy alone in stable myocardial infarction (MI) survivors with persistent infarct-related artery occlusion identified day 3 to 28 post MI. Intent-to-treat analysis showed no difference between strategies with respect to the incidence of new class IV congestive heart failure, MI, or death. The influence of PCI failure, procedural hazard, and crossover on trial results has not been reported. METHODS: Study angiograms were analyzed and adjudicated centrally. Factors associated with PCI failure were examined. Time-to-event analysis using the OAT primary outcome was performed by PCI success status. Landmark analysis (up to and beyond 30 days) partitioned early hazard versus late outcome according to treatment received. RESULTS: Percutaneous coronary intervention was adjudicated successful in >87%. Percutaneous coronary intervention failure rates were similar in US and non-US sites, and did not significantly influence outcome at 60 months (hazard ratio for success vs fail 0.79, 99% CI 0.45-1.40, P = .29). Partitioning of early procedural hazard revealed no late benefit for PCI (hazard ratio for PCI success vs medical therapy alone 1.06, 99% CI 0.75-1.50, P = .66). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous coronary intervention failure and complication rates in the OAT were low. Neither PCI failure nor early procedural hazard substantively influenced the primary trial results.American Heart AssociationRepositório do Hospital Prof. Doutor Fernando FonsecaBuller, CRankin, JCarere, RBuszman, PPfisterer, MDzavik, VThomas, BForman, SRuzyllo, WMancini, GMichalis, LAbreu, GLamas, GHochman, J2012-12-26T15:23:29Z2009-01-01T00:00:00Z2009-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.10/830engAm Heart J. 2009 Sep;158(3):408-151097-6744info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-09-20T15:51:41Zoai:repositorio.hff.min-saude.pt:10400.10/830Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:52:02.238701Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Percutaneous coronary intervention in the occluded artery trial: procedural success, hazard, and outcomes over 5 years.
title Percutaneous coronary intervention in the occluded artery trial: procedural success, hazard, and outcomes over 5 years.
spellingShingle Percutaneous coronary intervention in the occluded artery trial: procedural success, hazard, and outcomes over 5 years.
Buller, C
Angioplasty
Coronary angiography
Coronary occlusion
Myocardial infarction
title_short Percutaneous coronary intervention in the occluded artery trial: procedural success, hazard, and outcomes over 5 years.
title_full Percutaneous coronary intervention in the occluded artery trial: procedural success, hazard, and outcomes over 5 years.
title_fullStr Percutaneous coronary intervention in the occluded artery trial: procedural success, hazard, and outcomes over 5 years.
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous coronary intervention in the occluded artery trial: procedural success, hazard, and outcomes over 5 years.
title_sort Percutaneous coronary intervention in the occluded artery trial: procedural success, hazard, and outcomes over 5 years.
author Buller, C
author_facet Buller, C
Rankin, J
Carere, R
Buszman, P
Pfisterer, M
Dzavik, V
Thomas, B
Forman, S
Ruzyllo, W
Mancini, G
Michalis, L
Abreu, G
Lamas, G
Hochman, J
author_role author
author2 Rankin, J
Carere, R
Buszman, P
Pfisterer, M
Dzavik, V
Thomas, B
Forman, S
Ruzyllo, W
Mancini, G
Michalis, L
Abreu, G
Lamas, G
Hochman, J
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório do Hospital Prof. Doutor Fernando Fonseca
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Buller, C
Rankin, J
Carere, R
Buszman, P
Pfisterer, M
Dzavik, V
Thomas, B
Forman, S
Ruzyllo, W
Mancini, G
Michalis, L
Abreu, G
Lamas, G
Hochman, J
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Angioplasty
Coronary angiography
Coronary occlusion
Myocardial infarction
topic Angioplasty
Coronary angiography
Coronary occlusion
Myocardial infarction
description BACKGROUND: The Occluded Artery Trial (OAT) was a 2,201-patient randomized clinical trial comparing routine stent-based percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus optimal medical therapy alone in stable myocardial infarction (MI) survivors with persistent infarct-related artery occlusion identified day 3 to 28 post MI. Intent-to-treat analysis showed no difference between strategies with respect to the incidence of new class IV congestive heart failure, MI, or death. The influence of PCI failure, procedural hazard, and crossover on trial results has not been reported. METHODS: Study angiograms were analyzed and adjudicated centrally. Factors associated with PCI failure were examined. Time-to-event analysis using the OAT primary outcome was performed by PCI success status. Landmark analysis (up to and beyond 30 days) partitioned early hazard versus late outcome according to treatment received. RESULTS: Percutaneous coronary intervention was adjudicated successful in >87%. Percutaneous coronary intervention failure rates were similar in US and non-US sites, and did not significantly influence outcome at 60 months (hazard ratio for success vs fail 0.79, 99% CI 0.45-1.40, P = .29). Partitioning of early procedural hazard revealed no late benefit for PCI (hazard ratio for PCI success vs medical therapy alone 1.06, 99% CI 0.75-1.50, P = .66). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous coronary intervention failure and complication rates in the OAT were low. Neither PCI failure nor early procedural hazard substantively influenced the primary trial results.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-01-01T00:00:00Z
2009-01-01T00:00:00Z
2012-12-26T15:23:29Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.10/830
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.10/830
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Am Heart J. 2009 Sep;158(3):408-15
1097-6744
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Heart Association
publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Heart Association
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130384585195520