Role of biological medicines in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps - Systematic review and meta-analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.1063 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps is an inflammatory disease associated with high morbidity and quality of life impairment. The aim of this article is to evaluate the efficacy of new monoclonal therapies in the control of disease refractory to the available therapies and to discuss the multiple factors that should be taken into consideration in the use of these types of drugs. Methods: Systematic review with meta-analysis on the efficacy of biological therapies in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. It was also assessed, through a review of the relevant literature, the cost-benefit of biologic treatments. Results: In total, the meta-analysis included 11 randomized clinical trials that evaluated 4 monoclonal antibodies and all antibodies showed improvement in quality of life and a positive impact on the extent of the disease, despite its huge economical burden. Conclusion: In this systematic review, we were able to verify that dupilumab was the monoclonal antibody with the greatest impact, both on quality of life and on the extent of the disease. However, further studies are needed in the future to better assess the long-term effect of these new therapies. Furthermore, given the economic impact of its use, it is imperative to efficiently assess which patients benefit the most from biologic therapies. |
id |
RCAP_1ad057f70c9660ae9128d8166c4ae565 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:journalsporl.com:article/2013 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Role of biological medicines in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps - Systematic review and meta-analysisPapel dos medicamentos biológicos na rinossinusite crónica com pólipos nasais - Revisão sistemática com meta-análiseRinossinusite crónicaPólipos nasaisAnticorpos monoclonaisBiológicosChronic rhinosinusitisNasal polypsMonoclonal antibodiesBiologicsIntroduction: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps is an inflammatory disease associated with high morbidity and quality of life impairment. The aim of this article is to evaluate the efficacy of new monoclonal therapies in the control of disease refractory to the available therapies and to discuss the multiple factors that should be taken into consideration in the use of these types of drugs. Methods: Systematic review with meta-analysis on the efficacy of biological therapies in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. It was also assessed, through a review of the relevant literature, the cost-benefit of biologic treatments. Results: In total, the meta-analysis included 11 randomized clinical trials that evaluated 4 monoclonal antibodies and all antibodies showed improvement in quality of life and a positive impact on the extent of the disease, despite its huge economical burden. Conclusion: In this systematic review, we were able to verify that dupilumab was the monoclonal antibody with the greatest impact, both on quality of life and on the extent of the disease. However, further studies are needed in the future to better assess the long-term effect of these new therapies. Furthermore, given the economic impact of its use, it is imperative to efficiently assess which patients benefit the most from biologic therapies.Introdução: A rinossinusite crónica com pólipos nasais é uma doença inflamatória associada a elevada morbilidade e diminuição da qualidade de vida. O objetivo deste artigo é avaliar a eficácia das novas terapias monoclonais no controlo da doença refratária às terapêuticas disponíveis e discutir os múltiplos fatores que devem ser tidos em conta no uso destes fármacos. Métodos: Revisão sistemática com meta-análise sobre a eficácia das terapias biológicas na rinossinusite crónica com pólipos nasais. Foi efetuada também a revisão da literatura pertinente acerca do custo-benef ício dos medicamentos biológicos. Resultados: No total, a meta-análise incluiu 11 ensaios clínicos randomizados, que avaliaram 4 anticorpos monoclonais em que todos os anticorpos demonstraram melhorias na qualidade de vida e diminuição da extensão da doença, acarretando no entanto um elevado custo financeiro. Conclusão: Nesta revisão sistemática verificou-se que o dupilumab foi o anticorpo monoclonal com mais impacto, tanto na qualidade de vida como na extensão da doença. No entanto, são necessários mais estudos que avaliem o efeito a longo prazo destas novas terapêuticas. Além disso, dado o impacto económico que implica a utilização de medicamentos biológicos, é imperioso que se avalie de forma eficiente quais os doentes que mais beneficiam com esta terapêutica.Sociedade Portuguesa de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço2023-03-16info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.1063https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.1063Portuguese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery; Vol. 61 No. 1 (2023): March; 71-88Revista Portuguesa de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço; Vol. 61 Núm. 1 (2023): Março; 71-88Revista Portuguesa de Otorrinolaringologia-Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço; Vol. 61 N.º 1 (2023): Março; 71-882184-6499reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPengporhttps://journalsporl.com/index.php/sporl/article/view/2013https://journalsporl.com/index.php/sporl/article/view/2013/19https://journalsporl.com/index.php/sporl/article/view/2013/20Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Revista Portuguesa de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoçoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVila-Real-Fernandes, JoãoCerejeira, RuiVeloso-Teles, Rafaela2024-06-06T12:56:59Zoai:journalsporl.com:article/2013Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-06-06T12:56:59Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Role of biological medicines in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps - Systematic review and meta-analysis Papel dos medicamentos biológicos na rinossinusite crónica com pólipos nasais - Revisão sistemática com meta-análise |
title |
Role of biological medicines in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps - Systematic review and meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
Role of biological medicines in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps - Systematic review and meta-analysis Vila-Real-Fernandes, João Rinossinusite crónica Pólipos nasais Anticorpos monoclonais Biológicos Chronic rhinosinusitis Nasal polyps Monoclonal antibodies Biologics |
title_short |
Role of biological medicines in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps - Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
Role of biological medicines in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps - Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Role of biological medicines in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps - Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Role of biological medicines in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps - Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
Role of biological medicines in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps - Systematic review and meta-analysis |
author |
Vila-Real-Fernandes, João |
author_facet |
Vila-Real-Fernandes, João Cerejeira, Rui Veloso-Teles, Rafaela |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cerejeira, Rui Veloso-Teles, Rafaela |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vila-Real-Fernandes, João Cerejeira, Rui Veloso-Teles, Rafaela |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Rinossinusite crónica Pólipos nasais Anticorpos monoclonais Biológicos Chronic rhinosinusitis Nasal polyps Monoclonal antibodies Biologics |
topic |
Rinossinusite crónica Pólipos nasais Anticorpos monoclonais Biológicos Chronic rhinosinusitis Nasal polyps Monoclonal antibodies Biologics |
description |
Introduction: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps is an inflammatory disease associated with high morbidity and quality of life impairment. The aim of this article is to evaluate the efficacy of new monoclonal therapies in the control of disease refractory to the available therapies and to discuss the multiple factors that should be taken into consideration in the use of these types of drugs. Methods: Systematic review with meta-analysis on the efficacy of biological therapies in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. It was also assessed, through a review of the relevant literature, the cost-benefit of biologic treatments. Results: In total, the meta-analysis included 11 randomized clinical trials that evaluated 4 monoclonal antibodies and all antibodies showed improvement in quality of life and a positive impact on the extent of the disease, despite its huge economical burden. Conclusion: In this systematic review, we were able to verify that dupilumab was the monoclonal antibody with the greatest impact, both on quality of life and on the extent of the disease. However, further studies are needed in the future to better assess the long-term effect of these new therapies. Furthermore, given the economic impact of its use, it is imperative to efficiently assess which patients benefit the most from biologic therapies. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-03-16 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.1063 https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.1063 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.1063 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://journalsporl.com/index.php/sporl/article/view/2013 https://journalsporl.com/index.php/sporl/article/view/2013/19 https://journalsporl.com/index.php/sporl/article/view/2013/20 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Portuguese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery; Vol. 61 No. 1 (2023): March; 71-88 Revista Portuguesa de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço; Vol. 61 Núm. 1 (2023): Março; 71-88 Revista Portuguesa de Otorrinolaringologia-Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço; Vol. 61 N.º 1 (2023): Março; 71-88 2184-6499 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mluisa.alvim@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1817546025100902400 |