Pain as the fifth vital sign: a comparison between public and private healthcare systems

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Daniel Pozza
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Azevedo L, Castro-Lopes J.M.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/137568
Resumo: Background The assessment of pain as the fifth vital sign (P5VS) is of paramount importance since it leads to the management of undertreated pain, consequently reducing suffering, readmissions and emergency department visits after hospital discharge. Objective To evaluate the implementation of P5VS in public and private hospitals. Methods Data analysis on validated questionnaires was sent to all 171 Portuguese hospitals via an official letter. Results When compared to private hospitals, public hospitals presented a higher adherence to the process related to the P5VS. It has demonstrated superiority in the charts properly placed to record P5VS, in the number of emergency departments recording P5VS, in the regularity of audits, and in the existence of guidelines and staff training on pain assessment and management. Conclusion The standardization of both evaluation and recording of pain intensity constitutes a measure of good clinical practice. Public hospitals demonstrated better commitment to these procedures that should be properly carried out in all health care institutions.
id RCAP_1b1e59a368508ea55e5d186b49349bec
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/137568
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Pain as the fifth vital sign: a comparison between public and private healthcare systemsCiências da Saúde, Ciências médicas e da saúdeHealth sciences, Medical and Health sciencesBackground The assessment of pain as the fifth vital sign (P5VS) is of paramount importance since it leads to the management of undertreated pain, consequently reducing suffering, readmissions and emergency department visits after hospital discharge. Objective To evaluate the implementation of P5VS in public and private hospitals. Methods Data analysis on validated questionnaires was sent to all 171 Portuguese hospitals via an official letter. Results When compared to private hospitals, public hospitals presented a higher adherence to the process related to the P5VS. It has demonstrated superiority in the charts properly placed to record P5VS, in the number of emergency departments recording P5VS, in the regularity of audits, and in the existence of guidelines and staff training on pain assessment and management. Conclusion The standardization of both evaluation and recording of pain intensity constitutes a measure of good clinical practice. Public hospitals demonstrated better commitment to these procedures that should be properly carried out in all health care institutions.20212021-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/137568eng1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0259535Daniel PozzaAzevedo LCastro-Lopes J.M.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-29T14:27:50Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/137568Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T00:01:46.772482Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Pain as the fifth vital sign: a comparison between public and private healthcare systems
title Pain as the fifth vital sign: a comparison between public and private healthcare systems
spellingShingle Pain as the fifth vital sign: a comparison between public and private healthcare systems
Daniel Pozza
Ciências da Saúde, Ciências médicas e da saúde
Health sciences, Medical and Health sciences
title_short Pain as the fifth vital sign: a comparison between public and private healthcare systems
title_full Pain as the fifth vital sign: a comparison between public and private healthcare systems
title_fullStr Pain as the fifth vital sign: a comparison between public and private healthcare systems
title_full_unstemmed Pain as the fifth vital sign: a comparison between public and private healthcare systems
title_sort Pain as the fifth vital sign: a comparison between public and private healthcare systems
author Daniel Pozza
author_facet Daniel Pozza
Azevedo L
Castro-Lopes J.M.
author_role author
author2 Azevedo L
Castro-Lopes J.M.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Daniel Pozza
Azevedo L
Castro-Lopes J.M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ciências da Saúde, Ciências médicas e da saúde
Health sciences, Medical and Health sciences
topic Ciências da Saúde, Ciências médicas e da saúde
Health sciences, Medical and Health sciences
description Background The assessment of pain as the fifth vital sign (P5VS) is of paramount importance since it leads to the management of undertreated pain, consequently reducing suffering, readmissions and emergency department visits after hospital discharge. Objective To evaluate the implementation of P5VS in public and private hospitals. Methods Data analysis on validated questionnaires was sent to all 171 Portuguese hospitals via an official letter. Results When compared to private hospitals, public hospitals presented a higher adherence to the process related to the P5VS. It has demonstrated superiority in the charts properly placed to record P5VS, in the number of emergency departments recording P5VS, in the regularity of audits, and in the existence of guidelines and staff training on pain assessment and management. Conclusion The standardization of both evaluation and recording of pain intensity constitutes a measure of good clinical practice. Public hospitals demonstrated better commitment to these procedures that should be properly carried out in all health care institutions.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10216/137568
url https://hdl.handle.net/10216/137568
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1932-6203
10.1371/journal.pone.0259535
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799135941814648832