The rise of euroscepticism in the European council after brexit: should decision-making rules from the treaty of Lisbon be revised
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10362/142252 |
Resumo: | The Treaty of Lisbon was drafted to support the desire of an expanding European Union. It created a bias towards large Member States, and only considered the possibility for new accessions. However, Brexit proved that Euroscepticism is a real concern, and further increased the gap between large and small Member States. In this paper, we look at the post-Brexit redistribution of voting power and its impact on the dynamics inside the European Council. By examining multiple scenarios with the Banzhaf index, we conclude that the(Eurosceptic) Visegrád Group has the potential to become the new opposition force inside the EU, attaining a greater Banzhaf index than Germany. We there fore focus on a possible redesign of the double-majority rule and conclude that a scenario where the country quota increases by five percentage points is the one better approximating the Council to pre-Brexit levels. |
id |
RCAP_1d28ceca4a77e0b76b2997024d2ea789 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:run.unl.pt:10362/142252 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The rise of euroscepticism in the European council after brexit: should decision-making rules from the treaty of Lisbon be revisedEuropean UnionEuroscepticismCollective decision-makingBanzhaf indexDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e GestãoThe Treaty of Lisbon was drafted to support the desire of an expanding European Union. It created a bias towards large Member States, and only considered the possibility for new accessions. However, Brexit proved that Euroscepticism is a real concern, and further increased the gap between large and small Member States. In this paper, we look at the post-Brexit redistribution of voting power and its impact on the dynamics inside the European Council. By examining multiple scenarios with the Banzhaf index, we conclude that the(Eurosceptic) Visegrád Group has the potential to become the new opposition force inside the EU, attaining a greater Banzhaf index than Germany. We there fore focus on a possible redesign of the double-majority rule and conclude that a scenario where the country quota increases by five percentage points is the one better approximating the Council to pre-Brexit levels.Côrte-Real, PauloRUNAraujo, Lina Francisca Novais2022-07-21T13:32:51Z2022-01-142021-12-102022-01-14T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/142252TID:202975126enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T05:19:49Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/142252Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:50:13.898877Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The rise of euroscepticism in the European council after brexit: should decision-making rules from the treaty of Lisbon be revised |
title |
The rise of euroscepticism in the European council after brexit: should decision-making rules from the treaty of Lisbon be revised |
spellingShingle |
The rise of euroscepticism in the European council after brexit: should decision-making rules from the treaty of Lisbon be revised Araujo, Lina Francisca Novais European Union Euroscepticism Collective decision-making Banzhaf index Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão |
title_short |
The rise of euroscepticism in the European council after brexit: should decision-making rules from the treaty of Lisbon be revised |
title_full |
The rise of euroscepticism in the European council after brexit: should decision-making rules from the treaty of Lisbon be revised |
title_fullStr |
The rise of euroscepticism in the European council after brexit: should decision-making rules from the treaty of Lisbon be revised |
title_full_unstemmed |
The rise of euroscepticism in the European council after brexit: should decision-making rules from the treaty of Lisbon be revised |
title_sort |
The rise of euroscepticism in the European council after brexit: should decision-making rules from the treaty of Lisbon be revised |
author |
Araujo, Lina Francisca Novais |
author_facet |
Araujo, Lina Francisca Novais |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Côrte-Real, Paulo RUN |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Araujo, Lina Francisca Novais |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
European Union Euroscepticism Collective decision-making Banzhaf index Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão |
topic |
European Union Euroscepticism Collective decision-making Banzhaf index Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão |
description |
The Treaty of Lisbon was drafted to support the desire of an expanding European Union. It created a bias towards large Member States, and only considered the possibility for new accessions. However, Brexit proved that Euroscepticism is a real concern, and further increased the gap between large and small Member States. In this paper, we look at the post-Brexit redistribution of voting power and its impact on the dynamics inside the European Council. By examining multiple scenarios with the Banzhaf index, we conclude that the(Eurosceptic) Visegrád Group has the potential to become the new opposition force inside the EU, attaining a greater Banzhaf index than Germany. We there fore focus on a possible redesign of the double-majority rule and conclude that a scenario where the country quota increases by five percentage points is the one better approximating the Council to pre-Brexit levels. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-10 2022-07-21T13:32:51Z 2022-01-14 2022-01-14T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/142252 TID:202975126 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/142252 |
identifier_str_mv |
TID:202975126 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799138099336314880 |