Disciplinary Actions in Gynecology and Obstetrics in the North of Portugal from Year 2008 to 2012

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Francisco
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Rodrigues e Rodrigues, Manuel, Bernardes, João
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788
Resumo: Introduction: Disciplinary actions may have a significant impact in medical doctors’ and patients’ lives. The objective of this study was the assessment of the disciplinary actions in Obstetrics and Gynecology that occurred in the north of Portugal in years 2008 to 2012.Material and Methods: Retrospective descriptive study based on the anonymized data contained in the annual activity reports of Conselho Disciplinar da Seção Regional Norte da Ordem dos Médicos from 2008 to 2012. We calculated the proportion of disciplinary actions in Obstetrics and Gynaecology over the total number of registered specialists in that speciality. We also analysed the type of complainers, accused, institutions, complaints and decisions. For statistical inference proportions with 95% confidence intervals were estimated.Results: From years 2008 to 2012, we registered 1040 complaints in all medical specialities in the north of Portugal. Obstetrics and Gynecology was the forth most affected specialty, with a total of 54 complaints. Forty-three complaints were related with medical malpractice and if we only consider this type of complaint Obstetrics and Gynecology was the most affected specialty. The most frequent complainers and accused were, respectively, patients themselves and female physicians, with 41 to 60 years of age. Fifty-two complaints were archived without punishment while two still await conclusion.Discussion: The overall results of this study are in agreement with those reported by other authors.Conclusions: Obstetrics and Gynecology was the forth speciality with highest risk for any disciplinary action in the north of Portugal in years 2008 to 2012 and the first one in relation with alleged negligence. All presented and already concluded complaints were archived without penalty, except two that are still under evaluation.
id RCAP_1d833d6e6375758abcc1d0c859fffc6d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/5788
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Disciplinary Actions in Gynecology and Obstetrics in the North of Portugal from Year 2008 to 2012Ações Disciplinares em Ginecologia e Obstetrícia na Região Norte de Portugal nos Anos 2008 a 2012GynecologyLiabilityLegalMalpracticeObstetricsPortugalProfessional Misconduct.GinecologiaNegligênciaObstetríciaPortugalResponsabilidade Legal.Introduction: Disciplinary actions may have a significant impact in medical doctors’ and patients’ lives. The objective of this study was the assessment of the disciplinary actions in Obstetrics and Gynecology that occurred in the north of Portugal in years 2008 to 2012.Material and Methods: Retrospective descriptive study based on the anonymized data contained in the annual activity reports of Conselho Disciplinar da Seção Regional Norte da Ordem dos Médicos from 2008 to 2012. We calculated the proportion of disciplinary actions in Obstetrics and Gynaecology over the total number of registered specialists in that speciality. We also analysed the type of complainers, accused, institutions, complaints and decisions. For statistical inference proportions with 95% confidence intervals were estimated.Results: From years 2008 to 2012, we registered 1040 complaints in all medical specialities in the north of Portugal. Obstetrics and Gynecology was the forth most affected specialty, with a total of 54 complaints. Forty-three complaints were related with medical malpractice and if we only consider this type of complaint Obstetrics and Gynecology was the most affected specialty. The most frequent complainers and accused were, respectively, patients themselves and female physicians, with 41 to 60 years of age. Fifty-two complaints were archived without punishment while two still await conclusion.Discussion: The overall results of this study are in agreement with those reported by other authors.Conclusions: Obstetrics and Gynecology was the forth speciality with highest risk for any disciplinary action in the north of Portugal in years 2008 to 2012 and the first one in relation with alleged negligence. All presented and already concluded complaints were archived without penalty, except two that are still under evaluation.Introdução: As ações disciplinares podem ter um impacto significativo na vida dos médicos e dos doentes. O objetivo deste trabalho foi a avaliação das ações disciplinares em Ginecologia e Obstetrícia ocorridas na região norte de Portugal nos anos 2008 a 2012.Material e Métodos: Estudo descritivo retrospetivo baseado nos dados anonimizados disponíveis nos relatórios anuais de atividades do Conselho Disciplinar da Seção Regional Norte da Ordem dos Médicos dos anos 2008 a 2012. Calculámos a proporção de ações disciplinares em Ginecologia e Obstetrícia sobre o número total de especialistas inscritos. Avaliámos também os tipos de queixoso, de arguido, de instituição, de queixa e de decisão envolvidos. Para comparação de proporções utilizámos intervalos de confiança de 95%.Resultados: De 2008 a 2012, registou-se um total de 1040 ações disciplinares na região norte de Portugal. A Ginecologia e Obstetrícia foi a quarta especialidade mais afetada, com 54 queixas, 43 das quais relacionadas com alegada negligência médica e a mais afetada, se considerarmos apenas este tipo de queixa. Os queixosos e os arguidos mais frequentes foram, respetivamente, doentes em nome próprio e profissionais do sexo feminino, com idade compreendida entre os 41 e 60 anos. Das 54 ações disciplinares registadas, 52 foram concluídas sem penalização e duas aguardam decisão.Discussão: Os resultados estão genericamente de acordo com os de outros autores.Conclusões: A Ginecologia e Obstetrícia foi a quarta especialidade com maior risco de ação disciplinar na região norte de Portugal nos anos 2008 a 2012 e a primeira se considerarmos só as queixas de alegada negligência médica. Todas as ações disciplinares foram arquivadas, sem penalização dos médicos visados, com exceção de duas que se encontram ainda em avaliação.Ordem dos Médicos2015-03-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfimage/pngimage/pngapplication/mswordapplication/vnd.ms-excelapplication/mswordapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/5788Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 28 No. 2 (2015): March-April; 194-203Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 28 N.º 2 (2015): Março-Abril; 194-2031646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporenghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/4297https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/4444https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/7374https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/7375https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/7507https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/7605https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/7606https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/7703Silva, FranciscoRodrigues e Rodrigues, ManuelBernardes, Joãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-12-20T11:04:31Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/5788Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:19:10.541733Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Disciplinary Actions in Gynecology and Obstetrics in the North of Portugal from Year 2008 to 2012
Ações Disciplinares em Ginecologia e Obstetrícia na Região Norte de Portugal nos Anos 2008 a 2012
title Disciplinary Actions in Gynecology and Obstetrics in the North of Portugal from Year 2008 to 2012
spellingShingle Disciplinary Actions in Gynecology and Obstetrics in the North of Portugal from Year 2008 to 2012
Silva, Francisco
Gynecology
Liability
Legal
Malpractice
Obstetrics
Portugal
Professional Misconduct.
Ginecologia
Negligência
Obstetrícia
Portugal
Responsabilidade Legal.
title_short Disciplinary Actions in Gynecology and Obstetrics in the North of Portugal from Year 2008 to 2012
title_full Disciplinary Actions in Gynecology and Obstetrics in the North of Portugal from Year 2008 to 2012
title_fullStr Disciplinary Actions in Gynecology and Obstetrics in the North of Portugal from Year 2008 to 2012
title_full_unstemmed Disciplinary Actions in Gynecology and Obstetrics in the North of Portugal from Year 2008 to 2012
title_sort Disciplinary Actions in Gynecology and Obstetrics in the North of Portugal from Year 2008 to 2012
author Silva, Francisco
author_facet Silva, Francisco
Rodrigues e Rodrigues, Manuel
Bernardes, João
author_role author
author2 Rodrigues e Rodrigues, Manuel
Bernardes, João
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Francisco
Rodrigues e Rodrigues, Manuel
Bernardes, João
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Gynecology
Liability
Legal
Malpractice
Obstetrics
Portugal
Professional Misconduct.
Ginecologia
Negligência
Obstetrícia
Portugal
Responsabilidade Legal.
topic Gynecology
Liability
Legal
Malpractice
Obstetrics
Portugal
Professional Misconduct.
Ginecologia
Negligência
Obstetrícia
Portugal
Responsabilidade Legal.
description Introduction: Disciplinary actions may have a significant impact in medical doctors’ and patients’ lives. The objective of this study was the assessment of the disciplinary actions in Obstetrics and Gynecology that occurred in the north of Portugal in years 2008 to 2012.Material and Methods: Retrospective descriptive study based on the anonymized data contained in the annual activity reports of Conselho Disciplinar da Seção Regional Norte da Ordem dos Médicos from 2008 to 2012. We calculated the proportion of disciplinary actions in Obstetrics and Gynaecology over the total number of registered specialists in that speciality. We also analysed the type of complainers, accused, institutions, complaints and decisions. For statistical inference proportions with 95% confidence intervals were estimated.Results: From years 2008 to 2012, we registered 1040 complaints in all medical specialities in the north of Portugal. Obstetrics and Gynecology was the forth most affected specialty, with a total of 54 complaints. Forty-three complaints were related with medical malpractice and if we only consider this type of complaint Obstetrics and Gynecology was the most affected specialty. The most frequent complainers and accused were, respectively, patients themselves and female physicians, with 41 to 60 years of age. Fifty-two complaints were archived without punishment while two still await conclusion.Discussion: The overall results of this study are in agreement with those reported by other authors.Conclusions: Obstetrics and Gynecology was the forth speciality with highest risk for any disciplinary action in the north of Portugal in years 2008 to 2012 and the first one in relation with alleged negligence. All presented and already concluded complaints were archived without penalty, except two that are still under evaluation.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-03-30
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/5788
url https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/5788
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/4297
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/4444
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/7374
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/7375
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/7507
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/7605
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/7606
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/7703
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
image/png
image/png
application/msword
application/vnd.ms-excel
application/msword
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 28 No. 2 (2015): March-April; 194-203
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 28 N.º 2 (2015): Março-Abril; 194-203
1646-0758
0870-399X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130642991022080