Disciplinary Actions in Gynecology and Obstetrics in the North of Portugal from Year 2008 to 2012
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Disciplinary actions may have a significant impact in medical doctors’ and patients’ lives. The objective of this study was the assessment of the disciplinary actions in Obstetrics and Gynecology that occurred in the north of Portugal in years 2008 to 2012.Material and Methods: Retrospective descriptive study based on the anonymized data contained in the annual activity reports of Conselho Disciplinar da Seção Regional Norte da Ordem dos Médicos from 2008 to 2012. We calculated the proportion of disciplinary actions in Obstetrics and Gynaecology over the total number of registered specialists in that speciality. We also analysed the type of complainers, accused, institutions, complaints and decisions. For statistical inference proportions with 95% confidence intervals were estimated.Results: From years 2008 to 2012, we registered 1040 complaints in all medical specialities in the north of Portugal. Obstetrics and Gynecology was the forth most affected specialty, with a total of 54 complaints. Forty-three complaints were related with medical malpractice and if we only consider this type of complaint Obstetrics and Gynecology was the most affected specialty. The most frequent complainers and accused were, respectively, patients themselves and female physicians, with 41 to 60 years of age. Fifty-two complaints were archived without punishment while two still await conclusion.Discussion: The overall results of this study are in agreement with those reported by other authors.Conclusions: Obstetrics and Gynecology was the forth speciality with highest risk for any disciplinary action in the north of Portugal in years 2008 to 2012 and the first one in relation with alleged negligence. All presented and already concluded complaints were archived without penalty, except two that are still under evaluation. |
id |
RCAP_1d833d6e6375758abcc1d0c859fffc6d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/5788 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Disciplinary Actions in Gynecology and Obstetrics in the North of Portugal from Year 2008 to 2012Ações Disciplinares em Ginecologia e Obstetrícia na Região Norte de Portugal nos Anos 2008 a 2012GynecologyLiabilityLegalMalpracticeObstetricsPortugalProfessional Misconduct.GinecologiaNegligênciaObstetríciaPortugalResponsabilidade Legal.Introduction: Disciplinary actions may have a significant impact in medical doctors’ and patients’ lives. The objective of this study was the assessment of the disciplinary actions in Obstetrics and Gynecology that occurred in the north of Portugal in years 2008 to 2012.Material and Methods: Retrospective descriptive study based on the anonymized data contained in the annual activity reports of Conselho Disciplinar da Seção Regional Norte da Ordem dos Médicos from 2008 to 2012. We calculated the proportion of disciplinary actions in Obstetrics and Gynaecology over the total number of registered specialists in that speciality. We also analysed the type of complainers, accused, institutions, complaints and decisions. For statistical inference proportions with 95% confidence intervals were estimated.Results: From years 2008 to 2012, we registered 1040 complaints in all medical specialities in the north of Portugal. Obstetrics and Gynecology was the forth most affected specialty, with a total of 54 complaints. Forty-three complaints were related with medical malpractice and if we only consider this type of complaint Obstetrics and Gynecology was the most affected specialty. The most frequent complainers and accused were, respectively, patients themselves and female physicians, with 41 to 60 years of age. Fifty-two complaints were archived without punishment while two still await conclusion.Discussion: The overall results of this study are in agreement with those reported by other authors.Conclusions: Obstetrics and Gynecology was the forth speciality with highest risk for any disciplinary action in the north of Portugal in years 2008 to 2012 and the first one in relation with alleged negligence. All presented and already concluded complaints were archived without penalty, except two that are still under evaluation.Introdução: As ações disciplinares podem ter um impacto significativo na vida dos médicos e dos doentes. O objetivo deste trabalho foi a avaliação das ações disciplinares em Ginecologia e Obstetrícia ocorridas na região norte de Portugal nos anos 2008 a 2012.Material e Métodos: Estudo descritivo retrospetivo baseado nos dados anonimizados disponíveis nos relatórios anuais de atividades do Conselho Disciplinar da Seção Regional Norte da Ordem dos Médicos dos anos 2008 a 2012. Calculámos a proporção de ações disciplinares em Ginecologia e Obstetrícia sobre o número total de especialistas inscritos. Avaliámos também os tipos de queixoso, de arguido, de instituição, de queixa e de decisão envolvidos. Para comparação de proporções utilizámos intervalos de confiança de 95%.Resultados: De 2008 a 2012, registou-se um total de 1040 ações disciplinares na região norte de Portugal. A Ginecologia e Obstetrícia foi a quarta especialidade mais afetada, com 54 queixas, 43 das quais relacionadas com alegada negligência médica e a mais afetada, se considerarmos apenas este tipo de queixa. Os queixosos e os arguidos mais frequentes foram, respetivamente, doentes em nome próprio e profissionais do sexo feminino, com idade compreendida entre os 41 e 60 anos. Das 54 ações disciplinares registadas, 52 foram concluídas sem penalização e duas aguardam decisão.Discussão: Os resultados estão genericamente de acordo com os de outros autores.Conclusões: A Ginecologia e Obstetrícia foi a quarta especialidade com maior risco de ação disciplinar na região norte de Portugal nos anos 2008 a 2012 e a primeira se considerarmos só as queixas de alegada negligência médica. Todas as ações disciplinares foram arquivadas, sem penalização dos médicos visados, com exceção de duas que se encontram ainda em avaliação.Ordem dos Médicos2015-03-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfimage/pngimage/pngapplication/mswordapplication/vnd.ms-excelapplication/mswordapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/5788Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 28 No. 2 (2015): March-April; 194-203Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 28 N.º 2 (2015): Março-Abril; 194-2031646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporenghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/4297https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/4444https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/7374https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/7375https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/7507https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/7605https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/7606https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/7703Silva, FranciscoRodrigues e Rodrigues, ManuelBernardes, Joãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-12-20T11:04:31Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/5788Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:19:10.541733Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Disciplinary Actions in Gynecology and Obstetrics in the North of Portugal from Year 2008 to 2012 Ações Disciplinares em Ginecologia e Obstetrícia na Região Norte de Portugal nos Anos 2008 a 2012 |
title |
Disciplinary Actions in Gynecology and Obstetrics in the North of Portugal from Year 2008 to 2012 |
spellingShingle |
Disciplinary Actions in Gynecology and Obstetrics in the North of Portugal from Year 2008 to 2012 Silva, Francisco Gynecology Liability Legal Malpractice Obstetrics Portugal Professional Misconduct. Ginecologia Negligência Obstetrícia Portugal Responsabilidade Legal. |
title_short |
Disciplinary Actions in Gynecology and Obstetrics in the North of Portugal from Year 2008 to 2012 |
title_full |
Disciplinary Actions in Gynecology and Obstetrics in the North of Portugal from Year 2008 to 2012 |
title_fullStr |
Disciplinary Actions in Gynecology and Obstetrics in the North of Portugal from Year 2008 to 2012 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Disciplinary Actions in Gynecology and Obstetrics in the North of Portugal from Year 2008 to 2012 |
title_sort |
Disciplinary Actions in Gynecology and Obstetrics in the North of Portugal from Year 2008 to 2012 |
author |
Silva, Francisco |
author_facet |
Silva, Francisco Rodrigues e Rodrigues, Manuel Bernardes, João |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rodrigues e Rodrigues, Manuel Bernardes, João |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Francisco Rodrigues e Rodrigues, Manuel Bernardes, João |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Gynecology Liability Legal Malpractice Obstetrics Portugal Professional Misconduct. Ginecologia Negligência Obstetrícia Portugal Responsabilidade Legal. |
topic |
Gynecology Liability Legal Malpractice Obstetrics Portugal Professional Misconduct. Ginecologia Negligência Obstetrícia Portugal Responsabilidade Legal. |
description |
Introduction: Disciplinary actions may have a significant impact in medical doctors’ and patients’ lives. The objective of this study was the assessment of the disciplinary actions in Obstetrics and Gynecology that occurred in the north of Portugal in years 2008 to 2012.Material and Methods: Retrospective descriptive study based on the anonymized data contained in the annual activity reports of Conselho Disciplinar da Seção Regional Norte da Ordem dos Médicos from 2008 to 2012. We calculated the proportion of disciplinary actions in Obstetrics and Gynaecology over the total number of registered specialists in that speciality. We also analysed the type of complainers, accused, institutions, complaints and decisions. For statistical inference proportions with 95% confidence intervals were estimated.Results: From years 2008 to 2012, we registered 1040 complaints in all medical specialities in the north of Portugal. Obstetrics and Gynecology was the forth most affected specialty, with a total of 54 complaints. Forty-three complaints were related with medical malpractice and if we only consider this type of complaint Obstetrics and Gynecology was the most affected specialty. The most frequent complainers and accused were, respectively, patients themselves and female physicians, with 41 to 60 years of age. Fifty-two complaints were archived without punishment while two still await conclusion.Discussion: The overall results of this study are in agreement with those reported by other authors.Conclusions: Obstetrics and Gynecology was the forth speciality with highest risk for any disciplinary action in the north of Portugal in years 2008 to 2012 and the first one in relation with alleged negligence. All presented and already concluded complaints were archived without penalty, except two that are still under evaluation. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-03-30 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788 oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/5788 |
url |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/5788 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/4297 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/4444 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/7374 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/7375 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/7507 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/7605 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/7606 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5788/7703 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf image/png image/png application/msword application/vnd.ms-excel application/msword application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 28 No. 2 (2015): March-April; 194-203 Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 28 N.º 2 (2015): Março-Abril; 194-203 1646-0758 0870-399X reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130642991022080 |