Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments for visual rehabilitation of keratoconus patients

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marques, Manuel
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Rodrigues, Pedro Filipe, Alves, Samuel, Almeida, Hugo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.48560/rspo.16245
Resumo: Purpose Visual rehabilitation is an important part of keratoconus treatment. Glasses or contact lenses are usually sufficient in mild cases. Advanced disease may require surgical treatment. Intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) implantation is an effective treatment. However, surgical planning is in constant evolution and the visual results are hard to predict. We aim to assess predictive factors of the visual results, determining the best cases for this treatment.   Material and Methods: Retrospective analysis of successful ICRS implantation in our hospital. Refractive and topographical data in pre and postoperative setting was analyzed in order to identify predictive factors for success. INTACS-SK® ring segments were used, according to the plan recommended by the manufacturer.   Results Sixty-five surgeries were analyzed. Both uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) showed significant improvement after surgery (0.11±0.11 to 0.28±0.20 and 0.48±0.22 to 0.63±0.20, respectively). Refractive and keratometric values also improved significantly. BCVA improved in 43 eyes (67%), with gain of at least 2 Snellen lines in 28 eyes (43%). Post-op BCVA was negatively correlated with pre-op refraction, corneal thickness and corneal curvature. Visual improvement was negatively correlated with pre-op corneal astigmatism and steep K. Patients with steep K lower than 47.5D and corneal astigmatism lower than 3.75D had better results.   Conclusions ICRS implantation is effective in improving visual acuity, refraction and corneal shape. Eyes with more advanced disease (higher astigmatism and corneal curvature) have worse results, perhaps being better suited for other treatments, such as keratoplasty. It is possible that a different type of ring segment or improved surgical planning could improve the results.
id RCAP_1d837c924dc45187a8a9b9b5a134135b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/16245
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments for visual rehabilitation of keratoconus patientsArtigos OriginaisPurpose Visual rehabilitation is an important part of keratoconus treatment. Glasses or contact lenses are usually sufficient in mild cases. Advanced disease may require surgical treatment. Intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) implantation is an effective treatment. However, surgical planning is in constant evolution and the visual results are hard to predict. We aim to assess predictive factors of the visual results, determining the best cases for this treatment.   Material and Methods: Retrospective analysis of successful ICRS implantation in our hospital. Refractive and topographical data in pre and postoperative setting was analyzed in order to identify predictive factors for success. INTACS-SK® ring segments were used, according to the plan recommended by the manufacturer.   Results Sixty-five surgeries were analyzed. Both uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) showed significant improvement after surgery (0.11±0.11 to 0.28±0.20 and 0.48±0.22 to 0.63±0.20, respectively). Refractive and keratometric values also improved significantly. BCVA improved in 43 eyes (67%), with gain of at least 2 Snellen lines in 28 eyes (43%). Post-op BCVA was negatively correlated with pre-op refraction, corneal thickness and corneal curvature. Visual improvement was negatively correlated with pre-op corneal astigmatism and steep K. Patients with steep K lower than 47.5D and corneal astigmatism lower than 3.75D had better results.   Conclusions ICRS implantation is effective in improving visual acuity, refraction and corneal shape. Eyes with more advanced disease (higher astigmatism and corneal curvature) have worse results, perhaps being better suited for other treatments, such as keratoplasty. It is possible that a different type of ring segment or improved surgical planning could improve the results.Ajnet2020-10-21T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://doi.org/10.48560/rspo.16245eng1646-69501646-6950Marques, ManuelRodrigues, Pedro FilipeAlves, SamuelAlmeida, Hugoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-09-22T17:06:07Zoai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/16245Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:01:42.748240Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments for visual rehabilitation of keratoconus patients
title Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments for visual rehabilitation of keratoconus patients
spellingShingle Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments for visual rehabilitation of keratoconus patients
Marques, Manuel
Artigos Originais
title_short Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments for visual rehabilitation of keratoconus patients
title_full Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments for visual rehabilitation of keratoconus patients
title_fullStr Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments for visual rehabilitation of keratoconus patients
title_full_unstemmed Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments for visual rehabilitation of keratoconus patients
title_sort Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments for visual rehabilitation of keratoconus patients
author Marques, Manuel
author_facet Marques, Manuel
Rodrigues, Pedro Filipe
Alves, Samuel
Almeida, Hugo
author_role author
author2 Rodrigues, Pedro Filipe
Alves, Samuel
Almeida, Hugo
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marques, Manuel
Rodrigues, Pedro Filipe
Alves, Samuel
Almeida, Hugo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Artigos Originais
topic Artigos Originais
description Purpose Visual rehabilitation is an important part of keratoconus treatment. Glasses or contact lenses are usually sufficient in mild cases. Advanced disease may require surgical treatment. Intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) implantation is an effective treatment. However, surgical planning is in constant evolution and the visual results are hard to predict. We aim to assess predictive factors of the visual results, determining the best cases for this treatment.   Material and Methods: Retrospective analysis of successful ICRS implantation in our hospital. Refractive and topographical data in pre and postoperative setting was analyzed in order to identify predictive factors for success. INTACS-SK® ring segments were used, according to the plan recommended by the manufacturer.   Results Sixty-five surgeries were analyzed. Both uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) showed significant improvement after surgery (0.11±0.11 to 0.28±0.20 and 0.48±0.22 to 0.63±0.20, respectively). Refractive and keratometric values also improved significantly. BCVA improved in 43 eyes (67%), with gain of at least 2 Snellen lines in 28 eyes (43%). Post-op BCVA was negatively correlated with pre-op refraction, corneal thickness and corneal curvature. Visual improvement was negatively correlated with pre-op corneal astigmatism and steep K. Patients with steep K lower than 47.5D and corneal astigmatism lower than 3.75D had better results.   Conclusions ICRS implantation is effective in improving visual acuity, refraction and corneal shape. Eyes with more advanced disease (higher astigmatism and corneal curvature) have worse results, perhaps being better suited for other treatments, such as keratoplasty. It is possible that a different type of ring segment or improved surgical planning could improve the results.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-21T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.48560/rspo.16245
url https://doi.org/10.48560/rspo.16245
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1646-6950
1646-6950
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ajnet
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ajnet
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130482572525568