Comparison of embodied energy and carbon dioxide emissions of brick and concrete based on functional units

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sazedj, Soheyl
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Morais, António J., Jalali, Said
Tipo de documento: Artigo de conferência
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10174/14255
Resumo: Building materials have different consumption patterns of energy and emissions of carbon dioxide during their production. These differences result from the treatment of the raw materials and the techniques applied to production. Subsequently on an environmental classification one wonders what kind of constructive solution becomes more benevolent to the environment. Masonry building technique has made a comeback as an alternative to conventional reinforced concrete structures with ceramic blocks for closing the spans. The present study refers to the environmental comparison of these two systems. As the definition of functional unit has been introduced to facilitate the comparison of different existing alternatives, the walls are chosen as the functional units, for different building plans and conditions. The comparison considers the most important environmental parameters, i.e. the embodied energy and the carbon footprint. Results obtained indicate that masonry-building walls have a lower embodied energy and carbon footprint compared to those of conventional building. The differences vary with the length of the walls, but are over 22% and reach some 55%. It is hoped that the different wall types considered will enable the comparison of the two options for real application.
id RCAP_1dd58c11b08f42b08259fa98d078d7de
oai_identifier_str oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/14255
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Comparison of embodied energy and carbon dioxide emissions of brick and concrete based on functional unitsmasonrybrick wallscarbon footageembodied energyBuilding materials have different consumption patterns of energy and emissions of carbon dioxide during their production. These differences result from the treatment of the raw materials and the techniques applied to production. Subsequently on an environmental classification one wonders what kind of constructive solution becomes more benevolent to the environment. Masonry building technique has made a comeback as an alternative to conventional reinforced concrete structures with ceramic blocks for closing the spans. The present study refers to the environmental comparison of these two systems. As the definition of functional unit has been introduced to facilitate the comparison of different existing alternatives, the walls are chosen as the functional units, for different building plans and conditions. The comparison considers the most important environmental parameters, i.e. the embodied energy and the carbon footprint. Results obtained indicate that masonry-building walls have a lower embodied energy and carbon footprint compared to those of conventional building. The differences vary with the length of the walls, but are over 22% and reach some 55%. It is hoped that the different wall types considered will enable the comparison of the two options for real application.Universidade do Minho, Tecminho, Barroso Aguiar, Aires Camões, Raul Fangueiro, Rute Eires, Sandra Cunha e Mohammad Kheradmand2015-05-04T10:58:21Z2015-05-042014-03-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjecthttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/14255http://hdl.handle.net/10174/14255engSazedj, S., Morais, A., Jalali, S., COMPARISON OF EMBODIED ENERGY AND CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS OF BRICK AND CONCRETE BASED ON FUNCTIONAL UNITS, Congresso internacional, Luso-Brasileiro de Materiais de Construção Sustentáveis, (CLB-MCS 2014), Edição Universidade do Minho, Volume 1, Guimarães, Portugal, pp. 81-88, ISSN 2183-1866simnaonaosazedj@uevora.ptajmorais@fa.ulisboa.ptsaid@civil.uminho.pt470Sazedj, SoheylMorais, António J.Jalali, Saidinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T19:00:02Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/14255Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:07:23.997147Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of embodied energy and carbon dioxide emissions of brick and concrete based on functional units
title Comparison of embodied energy and carbon dioxide emissions of brick and concrete based on functional units
spellingShingle Comparison of embodied energy and carbon dioxide emissions of brick and concrete based on functional units
Sazedj, Soheyl
masonry
brick walls
carbon footage
embodied energy
title_short Comparison of embodied energy and carbon dioxide emissions of brick and concrete based on functional units
title_full Comparison of embodied energy and carbon dioxide emissions of brick and concrete based on functional units
title_fullStr Comparison of embodied energy and carbon dioxide emissions of brick and concrete based on functional units
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of embodied energy and carbon dioxide emissions of brick and concrete based on functional units
title_sort Comparison of embodied energy and carbon dioxide emissions of brick and concrete based on functional units
author Sazedj, Soheyl
author_facet Sazedj, Soheyl
Morais, António J.
Jalali, Said
author_role author
author2 Morais, António J.
Jalali, Said
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sazedj, Soheyl
Morais, António J.
Jalali, Said
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv masonry
brick walls
carbon footage
embodied energy
topic masonry
brick walls
carbon footage
embodied energy
description Building materials have different consumption patterns of energy and emissions of carbon dioxide during their production. These differences result from the treatment of the raw materials and the techniques applied to production. Subsequently on an environmental classification one wonders what kind of constructive solution becomes more benevolent to the environment. Masonry building technique has made a comeback as an alternative to conventional reinforced concrete structures with ceramic blocks for closing the spans. The present study refers to the environmental comparison of these two systems. As the definition of functional unit has been introduced to facilitate the comparison of different existing alternatives, the walls are chosen as the functional units, for different building plans and conditions. The comparison considers the most important environmental parameters, i.e. the embodied energy and the carbon footprint. Results obtained indicate that masonry-building walls have a lower embodied energy and carbon footprint compared to those of conventional building. The differences vary with the length of the walls, but are over 22% and reach some 55%. It is hoped that the different wall types considered will enable the comparison of the two options for real application.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-03-01T00:00:00Z
2015-05-04T10:58:21Z
2015-05-04
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10174/14255
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/14255
url http://hdl.handle.net/10174/14255
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Sazedj, S., Morais, A., Jalali, S., COMPARISON OF EMBODIED ENERGY AND CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS OF BRICK AND CONCRETE BASED ON FUNCTIONAL UNITS, Congresso internacional, Luso-Brasileiro de Materiais de Construção Sustentáveis, (CLB-MCS 2014), Edição Universidade do Minho, Volume 1, Guimarães, Portugal, pp. 81-88, ISSN 2183-1866
sim
nao
nao
sazedj@uevora.pt
ajmorais@fa.ulisboa.pt
said@civil.uminho.pt
470
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho, Tecminho, Barroso Aguiar, Aires Camões, Raul Fangueiro, Rute Eires, Sandra Cunha e Mohammad Kheradmand
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho, Tecminho, Barroso Aguiar, Aires Camões, Raul Fangueiro, Rute Eires, Sandra Cunha e Mohammad Kheradmand
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136558700298240