Comparison of embodied energy and carbon dioxide emissions of brick and concrete based on functional units
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo de conferência |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10174/14255 |
Resumo: | Building materials have different consumption patterns of energy and emissions of carbon dioxide during their production. These differences result from the treatment of the raw materials and the techniques applied to production. Subsequently on an environmental classification one wonders what kind of constructive solution becomes more benevolent to the environment. Masonry building technique has made a comeback as an alternative to conventional reinforced concrete structures with ceramic blocks for closing the spans. The present study refers to the environmental comparison of these two systems. As the definition of functional unit has been introduced to facilitate the comparison of different existing alternatives, the walls are chosen as the functional units, for different building plans and conditions. The comparison considers the most important environmental parameters, i.e. the embodied energy and the carbon footprint. Results obtained indicate that masonry-building walls have a lower embodied energy and carbon footprint compared to those of conventional building. The differences vary with the length of the walls, but are over 22% and reach some 55%. It is hoped that the different wall types considered will enable the comparison of the two options for real application. |
id |
RCAP_1dd58c11b08f42b08259fa98d078d7de |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/14255 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Comparison of embodied energy and carbon dioxide emissions of brick and concrete based on functional unitsmasonrybrick wallscarbon footageembodied energyBuilding materials have different consumption patterns of energy and emissions of carbon dioxide during their production. These differences result from the treatment of the raw materials and the techniques applied to production. Subsequently on an environmental classification one wonders what kind of constructive solution becomes more benevolent to the environment. Masonry building technique has made a comeback as an alternative to conventional reinforced concrete structures with ceramic blocks for closing the spans. The present study refers to the environmental comparison of these two systems. As the definition of functional unit has been introduced to facilitate the comparison of different existing alternatives, the walls are chosen as the functional units, for different building plans and conditions. The comparison considers the most important environmental parameters, i.e. the embodied energy and the carbon footprint. Results obtained indicate that masonry-building walls have a lower embodied energy and carbon footprint compared to those of conventional building. The differences vary with the length of the walls, but are over 22% and reach some 55%. It is hoped that the different wall types considered will enable the comparison of the two options for real application.Universidade do Minho, Tecminho, Barroso Aguiar, Aires Camões, Raul Fangueiro, Rute Eires, Sandra Cunha e Mohammad Kheradmand2015-05-04T10:58:21Z2015-05-042014-03-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjecthttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/14255http://hdl.handle.net/10174/14255engSazedj, S., Morais, A., Jalali, S., COMPARISON OF EMBODIED ENERGY AND CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS OF BRICK AND CONCRETE BASED ON FUNCTIONAL UNITS, Congresso internacional, Luso-Brasileiro de Materiais de Construção Sustentáveis, (CLB-MCS 2014), Edição Universidade do Minho, Volume 1, Guimarães, Portugal, pp. 81-88, ISSN 2183-1866simnaonaosazedj@uevora.ptajmorais@fa.ulisboa.ptsaid@civil.uminho.pt470Sazedj, SoheylMorais, António J.Jalali, Saidinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T19:00:02Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/14255Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:07:23.997147Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of embodied energy and carbon dioxide emissions of brick and concrete based on functional units |
title |
Comparison of embodied energy and carbon dioxide emissions of brick and concrete based on functional units |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of embodied energy and carbon dioxide emissions of brick and concrete based on functional units Sazedj, Soheyl masonry brick walls carbon footage embodied energy |
title_short |
Comparison of embodied energy and carbon dioxide emissions of brick and concrete based on functional units |
title_full |
Comparison of embodied energy and carbon dioxide emissions of brick and concrete based on functional units |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of embodied energy and carbon dioxide emissions of brick and concrete based on functional units |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of embodied energy and carbon dioxide emissions of brick and concrete based on functional units |
title_sort |
Comparison of embodied energy and carbon dioxide emissions of brick and concrete based on functional units |
author |
Sazedj, Soheyl |
author_facet |
Sazedj, Soheyl Morais, António J. Jalali, Said |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Morais, António J. Jalali, Said |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sazedj, Soheyl Morais, António J. Jalali, Said |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
masonry brick walls carbon footage embodied energy |
topic |
masonry brick walls carbon footage embodied energy |
description |
Building materials have different consumption patterns of energy and emissions of carbon dioxide during their production. These differences result from the treatment of the raw materials and the techniques applied to production. Subsequently on an environmental classification one wonders what kind of constructive solution becomes more benevolent to the environment. Masonry building technique has made a comeback as an alternative to conventional reinforced concrete structures with ceramic blocks for closing the spans. The present study refers to the environmental comparison of these two systems. As the definition of functional unit has been introduced to facilitate the comparison of different existing alternatives, the walls are chosen as the functional units, for different building plans and conditions. The comparison considers the most important environmental parameters, i.e. the embodied energy and the carbon footprint. Results obtained indicate that masonry-building walls have a lower embodied energy and carbon footprint compared to those of conventional building. The differences vary with the length of the walls, but are over 22% and reach some 55%. It is hoped that the different wall types considered will enable the comparison of the two options for real application. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-03-01T00:00:00Z 2015-05-04T10:58:21Z 2015-05-04 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject |
format |
conferenceObject |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/14255 http://hdl.handle.net/10174/14255 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/14255 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Sazedj, S., Morais, A., Jalali, S., COMPARISON OF EMBODIED ENERGY AND CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS OF BRICK AND CONCRETE BASED ON FUNCTIONAL UNITS, Congresso internacional, Luso-Brasileiro de Materiais de Construção Sustentáveis, (CLB-MCS 2014), Edição Universidade do Minho, Volume 1, Guimarães, Portugal, pp. 81-88, ISSN 2183-1866 sim nao nao sazedj@uevora.pt ajmorais@fa.ulisboa.pt said@civil.uminho.pt 470 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Minho, Tecminho, Barroso Aguiar, Aires Camões, Raul Fangueiro, Rute Eires, Sandra Cunha e Mohammad Kheradmand |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Minho, Tecminho, Barroso Aguiar, Aires Camões, Raul Fangueiro, Rute Eires, Sandra Cunha e Mohammad Kheradmand |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136558700298240 |