Evidence in International Arbitration: Admissibility, Relevance and Differences between Common and Civil Law

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sharma, Tanmayi
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2018.2005
Resumo: Arbitration is a form of alternate dispute resolution, that takes place outside the court of law. Arbitral tribunals are usually not bound by domestic procedures for collection and evaluation of evidence. There exists a vacuum with respect to laws relating to evidence in International arbitration, making it imperative to examine the rules of evidentiary collection and examination in arbitral tribunals. This paper seeks to examine the procedure relating to the admissibility and relevance of evidence in international arbitration. Parallelly, this paper will also examine the differences in procedure in Civil and Common law jurisdictions, the practical effect of these differences and the implications of the same.
id RCAP_1ddba9df8f73dc1a2229a10b01c15772
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/2005
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Evidence in International Arbitration: Admissibility, Relevance and Differences between Common and Civil LawArbitration is a form of alternate dispute resolution, that takes place outside the court of law. Arbitral tribunals are usually not bound by domestic procedures for collection and evaluation of evidence. There exists a vacuum with respect to laws relating to evidence in International arbitration, making it imperative to examine the rules of evidentiary collection and examination in arbitral tribunals. This paper seeks to examine the procedure relating to the admissibility and relevance of evidence in international arbitration. Parallelly, this paper will also examine the differences in procedure in Civil and Common law jurisdictions, the practical effect of these differences and the implications of the same.A arbitragem é uma forma de resolução alternativa de litígios. Os tribunais arbitrais não estão geralmente vinculados à observância de regras legais que versem sobre os meios de obtenção da prova e sobre o valor probatório dos diversos meios de prova. Em face do vazio legal no que respeita à prova na arbitragem internacional, analisam-se as regras que versam sobre os meios de obtenção e a valoração da prova nos tribunais arbitrais. Neste artigo, procura avaliar-se a admissibilidade e o valor da prova na arbitragem internacional. Paralelamente, procura estabelecer-se as diferenças existentes a nível procedimental nas jurisdições de Civil e Common Law, bem como assinalar o efeito prático e as implicações dessas mesmas diferenças.Universidade Católica Portuguesa2018-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2018.2005https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2018.2005Católica Law Review; Vol 2 No 2 (2018): Private law; 99-113Católica Law Review; v. 2 n. 2 (2018): Direito privado; 99-1132184-03342183-933610.34632/catolicalawreview.2018.2.2reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/catolicalawreview/article/view/2005https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/catolicalawreview/article/view/2005/1929Direitos de Autor (c) 2018 Tanmayi Sharmahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSharma, Tanmayi2023-10-03T15:41:11Zoai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/2005Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:32:46.815439Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evidence in International Arbitration: Admissibility, Relevance and Differences between Common and Civil Law
title Evidence in International Arbitration: Admissibility, Relevance and Differences between Common and Civil Law
spellingShingle Evidence in International Arbitration: Admissibility, Relevance and Differences between Common and Civil Law
Sharma, Tanmayi
title_short Evidence in International Arbitration: Admissibility, Relevance and Differences between Common and Civil Law
title_full Evidence in International Arbitration: Admissibility, Relevance and Differences between Common and Civil Law
title_fullStr Evidence in International Arbitration: Admissibility, Relevance and Differences between Common and Civil Law
title_full_unstemmed Evidence in International Arbitration: Admissibility, Relevance and Differences between Common and Civil Law
title_sort Evidence in International Arbitration: Admissibility, Relevance and Differences between Common and Civil Law
author Sharma, Tanmayi
author_facet Sharma, Tanmayi
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sharma, Tanmayi
description Arbitration is a form of alternate dispute resolution, that takes place outside the court of law. Arbitral tribunals are usually not bound by domestic procedures for collection and evaluation of evidence. There exists a vacuum with respect to laws relating to evidence in International arbitration, making it imperative to examine the rules of evidentiary collection and examination in arbitral tribunals. This paper seeks to examine the procedure relating to the admissibility and relevance of evidence in international arbitration. Parallelly, this paper will also examine the differences in procedure in Civil and Common law jurisdictions, the practical effect of these differences and the implications of the same.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-05-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2018.2005
https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2018.2005
url https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2018.2005
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/catolicalawreview/article/view/2005
https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/catolicalawreview/article/view/2005/1929
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2018 Tanmayi Sharma
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2018 Tanmayi Sharma
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica Portuguesa
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica Portuguesa
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Católica Law Review; Vol 2 No 2 (2018): Private law; 99-113
Católica Law Review; v. 2 n. 2 (2018): Direito privado; 99-113
2184-0334
2183-9336
10.34632/catolicalawreview.2018.2.2
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133593646137344

Registros relacionados