Barriers and facilitators to managing uncertainty in nurses' clinical reasoning in post-anaesthesia care units: a qualitative thematic analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cunha, Lara Daniela Matos
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Santos, Márcia Noélia Pestana dos, Lomba, Maria de Lurdes Lopes de Freitas, Santos, Margarida Reis
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/info:doi:https://doi.org/10.37464/2023.404.1120
Resumo: Objective: To describe and analyse barriers and facilitators to managing uncertainty in nurses' clinical reasoning in post-anaesthesia care units. Background: The diagnostic process in complex clinical settings often involves uncertainty. This can bias clinical reasoning and compromise the safety of healthcare. Still, little is known about how nurses deal with uncertainty in their clinical practice. Study design and methods: This study employs a qualitative descriptive design. Fourteen nurses working at a post-anaesthesia care unit were selected through convenience sampling. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews and analysed using thematic analysis. The deductive analysis was undertaken based on the Theory of Reasoned Action. This study followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist. Results: Two major themes emerged from the analysis: 'barriers' and 'facilitators'. Each major theme aggregated four themes: intention to perform the behaviour, attitudes, subjective norms, and external variables. Discussion: The perceptions of barriers and facilitators provide valuable insights into current and desired practices that can help minimise uncertainty in nurses' clinical reasoning in post-anaesthesia care units. They provide knowledge and future direction for clinical practice improvements by addressing motivations for reasoning behaviour. The need to create more nurse-friendly working conditions and reduce the cognitive and emotional impact of uncertainty was also identified. Conclusion: This study provides a comprehensive list of barriers and facilitators of uncertainty management in clinical reasoning based on nurses' perceptions. Recognising behaviours based on reasoned action is essential to manage uncertainty in nurses' clinical reasoning.
id RCAP_1ed3438c4286b1bcdf973d03c8f96f04
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.esenfc.pt:14595
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Barriers and facilitators to managing uncertainty in nurses' clinical reasoning in post-anaesthesia care units: a qualitative thematic analysisUncertaintyPost-anaesthesia Nursingpatient safetyPostoperative PeriodClinical ReasoningClinical Decision-MakingObjective: To describe and analyse barriers and facilitators to managing uncertainty in nurses' clinical reasoning in post-anaesthesia care units. Background: The diagnostic process in complex clinical settings often involves uncertainty. This can bias clinical reasoning and compromise the safety of healthcare. Still, little is known about how nurses deal with uncertainty in their clinical practice. Study design and methods: This study employs a qualitative descriptive design. Fourteen nurses working at a post-anaesthesia care unit were selected through convenience sampling. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews and analysed using thematic analysis. The deductive analysis was undertaken based on the Theory of Reasoned Action. This study followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist. Results: Two major themes emerged from the analysis: 'barriers' and 'facilitators'. Each major theme aggregated four themes: intention to perform the behaviour, attitudes, subjective norms, and external variables. Discussion: The perceptions of barriers and facilitators provide valuable insights into current and desired practices that can help minimise uncertainty in nurses' clinical reasoning in post-anaesthesia care units. They provide knowledge and future direction for clinical practice improvements by addressing motivations for reasoning behaviour. The need to create more nurse-friendly working conditions and reduce the cognitive and emotional impact of uncertainty was also identified. Conclusion: This study provides a comprehensive list of barriers and facilitators of uncertainty management in clinical reasoning based on nurses' perceptions. Recognising behaviours based on reasoned action is essential to manage uncertainty in nurses' clinical reasoning.2023-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://doi.org/info:doi:https://doi.org/10.37464/2023.404.1120https://doi.org/info:doi:https://doi.org/10.37464/2023.404.1120enghttp://web.esenfc.pt/?url=ocxFJ88tCunha, Lara Daniela MatosSantos, Márcia Noélia Pestana dosLomba, Maria de Lurdes Lopes de FreitasSantos, Margarida Reisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-12-18T00:00:00Zoai:repositorio.esenfc.pt:14595Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:13:31.922146Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Barriers and facilitators to managing uncertainty in nurses' clinical reasoning in post-anaesthesia care units: a qualitative thematic analysis
title Barriers and facilitators to managing uncertainty in nurses' clinical reasoning in post-anaesthesia care units: a qualitative thematic analysis
spellingShingle Barriers and facilitators to managing uncertainty in nurses' clinical reasoning in post-anaesthesia care units: a qualitative thematic analysis
Cunha, Lara Daniela Matos
Uncertainty
Post-anaesthesia Nursing
patient safety
Postoperative Period
Clinical Reasoning
Clinical Decision-Making
title_short Barriers and facilitators to managing uncertainty in nurses' clinical reasoning in post-anaesthesia care units: a qualitative thematic analysis
title_full Barriers and facilitators to managing uncertainty in nurses' clinical reasoning in post-anaesthesia care units: a qualitative thematic analysis
title_fullStr Barriers and facilitators to managing uncertainty in nurses' clinical reasoning in post-anaesthesia care units: a qualitative thematic analysis
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and facilitators to managing uncertainty in nurses' clinical reasoning in post-anaesthesia care units: a qualitative thematic analysis
title_sort Barriers and facilitators to managing uncertainty in nurses' clinical reasoning in post-anaesthesia care units: a qualitative thematic analysis
author Cunha, Lara Daniela Matos
author_facet Cunha, Lara Daniela Matos
Santos, Márcia Noélia Pestana dos
Lomba, Maria de Lurdes Lopes de Freitas
Santos, Margarida Reis
author_role author
author2 Santos, Márcia Noélia Pestana dos
Lomba, Maria de Lurdes Lopes de Freitas
Santos, Margarida Reis
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cunha, Lara Daniela Matos
Santos, Márcia Noélia Pestana dos
Lomba, Maria de Lurdes Lopes de Freitas
Santos, Margarida Reis
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Uncertainty
Post-anaesthesia Nursing
patient safety
Postoperative Period
Clinical Reasoning
Clinical Decision-Making
topic Uncertainty
Post-anaesthesia Nursing
patient safety
Postoperative Period
Clinical Reasoning
Clinical Decision-Making
description Objective: To describe and analyse barriers and facilitators to managing uncertainty in nurses' clinical reasoning in post-anaesthesia care units. Background: The diagnostic process in complex clinical settings often involves uncertainty. This can bias clinical reasoning and compromise the safety of healthcare. Still, little is known about how nurses deal with uncertainty in their clinical practice. Study design and methods: This study employs a qualitative descriptive design. Fourteen nurses working at a post-anaesthesia care unit were selected through convenience sampling. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews and analysed using thematic analysis. The deductive analysis was undertaken based on the Theory of Reasoned Action. This study followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist. Results: Two major themes emerged from the analysis: 'barriers' and 'facilitators'. Each major theme aggregated four themes: intention to perform the behaviour, attitudes, subjective norms, and external variables. Discussion: The perceptions of barriers and facilitators provide valuable insights into current and desired practices that can help minimise uncertainty in nurses' clinical reasoning in post-anaesthesia care units. They provide knowledge and future direction for clinical practice improvements by addressing motivations for reasoning behaviour. The need to create more nurse-friendly working conditions and reduce the cognitive and emotional impact of uncertainty was also identified. Conclusion: This study provides a comprehensive list of barriers and facilitators of uncertainty management in clinical reasoning based on nurses' perceptions. Recognising behaviours based on reasoned action is essential to manage uncertainty in nurses' clinical reasoning.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-18
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/info:doi:https://doi.org/10.37464/2023.404.1120
https://doi.org/info:doi:https://doi.org/10.37464/2023.404.1120
url https://doi.org/info:doi:https://doi.org/10.37464/2023.404.1120
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://web.esenfc.pt/?url=ocxFJ88t
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137238284500992