Validation of the revised Belief in a Just World Scale based on Popular Sayings
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0870-82312022000100147 |
Resumo: | Abstract The development of measures that assess individual differences in the Belief in a Just World plays an important role in advancing research in this area. The intent of this article was to validate a new version of the Belief in a Just World Scale based on Popular Sayings (BJWPS), proposing that this measure may be an alternative to the original scale. For this, two studies were developed: Study 1 (N=160) aimed to presenting psychometric evidence for a new version of the BJWPS scale through an exploratory factor analysis. Study 2 (N=144) aimed to verify the goodness-of-fit of the proposed measurement model using confirmatory factor analysis. Results of the two studies indicated a single-factor structure that assesses BJW, which corroborates the theoretical frameworks of the BJW scales. Together, the results allow us to conclude that the BJWPS presented satisfactory psychometric indexes. |
id |
RCAP_208a1e3d43df12cc31832b9e5b514898 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0870-82312022000100147 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Validation of the revised Belief in a Just World Scale based on Popular SayingsBelief in a just worldPopular sayingsValidity of tests.Abstract The development of measures that assess individual differences in the Belief in a Just World plays an important role in advancing research in this area. The intent of this article was to validate a new version of the Belief in a Just World Scale based on Popular Sayings (BJWPS), proposing that this measure may be an alternative to the original scale. For this, two studies were developed: Study 1 (N=160) aimed to presenting psychometric evidence for a new version of the BJWPS scale through an exploratory factor analysis. Study 2 (N=144) aimed to verify the goodness-of-fit of the proposed measurement model using confirmatory factor analysis. Results of the two studies indicated a single-factor structure that assesses BJW, which corroborates the theoretical frameworks of the BJW scales. Together, the results allow us to conclude that the BJWPS presented satisfactory psychometric indexes.ISPA-Instituto Universitário2022-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0870-82312022000100147Análise Psicológica v.40 n.1 2022reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0870-82312022000100147Linhares,Layanne VieiraTorres,Ana Raquel RosasPereira,Cícero Robertoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:00:59Zoai:scielo:S0870-82312022000100147Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:16:38.703102Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Validation of the revised Belief in a Just World Scale based on Popular Sayings |
title |
Validation of the revised Belief in a Just World Scale based on Popular Sayings |
spellingShingle |
Validation of the revised Belief in a Just World Scale based on Popular Sayings Linhares,Layanne Vieira Belief in a just world Popular sayings Validity of tests. |
title_short |
Validation of the revised Belief in a Just World Scale based on Popular Sayings |
title_full |
Validation of the revised Belief in a Just World Scale based on Popular Sayings |
title_fullStr |
Validation of the revised Belief in a Just World Scale based on Popular Sayings |
title_full_unstemmed |
Validation of the revised Belief in a Just World Scale based on Popular Sayings |
title_sort |
Validation of the revised Belief in a Just World Scale based on Popular Sayings |
author |
Linhares,Layanne Vieira |
author_facet |
Linhares,Layanne Vieira Torres,Ana Raquel Rosas Pereira,Cícero Roberto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Torres,Ana Raquel Rosas Pereira,Cícero Roberto |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Linhares,Layanne Vieira Torres,Ana Raquel Rosas Pereira,Cícero Roberto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Belief in a just world Popular sayings Validity of tests. |
topic |
Belief in a just world Popular sayings Validity of tests. |
description |
Abstract The development of measures that assess individual differences in the Belief in a Just World plays an important role in advancing research in this area. The intent of this article was to validate a new version of the Belief in a Just World Scale based on Popular Sayings (BJWPS), proposing that this measure may be an alternative to the original scale. For this, two studies were developed: Study 1 (N=160) aimed to presenting psychometric evidence for a new version of the BJWPS scale through an exploratory factor analysis. Study 2 (N=144) aimed to verify the goodness-of-fit of the proposed measurement model using confirmatory factor analysis. Results of the two studies indicated a single-factor structure that assesses BJW, which corroborates the theoretical frameworks of the BJW scales. Together, the results allow us to conclude that the BJWPS presented satisfactory psychometric indexes. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0870-82312022000100147 |
url |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0870-82312022000100147 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0870-82312022000100147 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ISPA-Instituto Universitário |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ISPA-Instituto Universitário |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Análise Psicológica v.40 n.1 2022 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1817550058425417728 |