Russia’s Security Perceptions and Arctic Governance

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Borozna, Angela
Data de Publicação: 2024
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7313
Resumo: Russia’s war in Ukraine further strained Russia’s relations with the West and negatively influenced Arctic regional governance, especially after seven members of the Arctic Council paused cooperation with Russia. The rationale of the suspension was to express disapproval by seven Arctic states of Russia’s aggression in Ukraine. However, the suspension of cooperation with Russia within the Arctic Council format prompted some observers to question the relevance and utility of the institution. Russia never expressed its wish to leave the Council and continues to express its desire for multilateral cooperation in the region. This raises the question: Can Russia’s assertive stance in Ukraine coexist with peaceful cooperation in the Arctic? In order to answer this question, this article addresses the following questions: How does the geopolitical tension shape Russia’s approach to Arctic governance? And what is the role of military and economic security in Russia’s Arctic policy? The article uses a comparative method combined with discourse analysis to establish a change in Russia’s view on Arctic governance before and after the war in Ukraine.
id RCAP_20998739225e7e63ecec6591b0c87f40
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/7313
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Russia’s Security Perceptions and Arctic GovernanceArctic Council; Arctic governance; economic security; militarization; military security; Northern Sea Route; Russia; security; threat perceptionRussia’s war in Ukraine further strained Russia’s relations with the West and negatively influenced Arctic regional governance, especially after seven members of the Arctic Council paused cooperation with Russia. The rationale of the suspension was to express disapproval by seven Arctic states of Russia’s aggression in Ukraine. However, the suspension of cooperation with Russia within the Arctic Council format prompted some observers to question the relevance and utility of the institution. Russia never expressed its wish to leave the Council and continues to express its desire for multilateral cooperation in the region. This raises the question: Can Russia’s assertive stance in Ukraine coexist with peaceful cooperation in the Arctic? In order to answer this question, this article addresses the following questions: How does the geopolitical tension shape Russia’s approach to Arctic governance? And what is the role of military and economic security in Russia’s Arctic policy? The article uses a comparative method combined with discourse analysis to establish a change in Russia’s view on Arctic governance before and after the war in Ukraine.Cogitatio Press2024-01-17info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7313https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7313Politics and Governance; Vol 12 (2024): Arctic Regional Governance: Actors and Transformations2183-246310.17645/pag.i377reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7313https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7313/3576Copyright (c) 2024 Angela Boroznainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBorozna, Angela2024-01-18T16:25:26Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/7313Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:52:01.757503Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Russia’s Security Perceptions and Arctic Governance
title Russia’s Security Perceptions and Arctic Governance
spellingShingle Russia’s Security Perceptions and Arctic Governance
Borozna, Angela
Arctic Council; Arctic governance; economic security; militarization; military security; Northern Sea Route; Russia; security; threat perception
title_short Russia’s Security Perceptions and Arctic Governance
title_full Russia’s Security Perceptions and Arctic Governance
title_fullStr Russia’s Security Perceptions and Arctic Governance
title_full_unstemmed Russia’s Security Perceptions and Arctic Governance
title_sort Russia’s Security Perceptions and Arctic Governance
author Borozna, Angela
author_facet Borozna, Angela
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Borozna, Angela
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Arctic Council; Arctic governance; economic security; militarization; military security; Northern Sea Route; Russia; security; threat perception
topic Arctic Council; Arctic governance; economic security; militarization; military security; Northern Sea Route; Russia; security; threat perception
description Russia’s war in Ukraine further strained Russia’s relations with the West and negatively influenced Arctic regional governance, especially after seven members of the Arctic Council paused cooperation with Russia. The rationale of the suspension was to express disapproval by seven Arctic states of Russia’s aggression in Ukraine. However, the suspension of cooperation with Russia within the Arctic Council format prompted some observers to question the relevance and utility of the institution. Russia never expressed its wish to leave the Council and continues to express its desire for multilateral cooperation in the region. This raises the question: Can Russia’s assertive stance in Ukraine coexist with peaceful cooperation in the Arctic? In order to answer this question, this article addresses the following questions: How does the geopolitical tension shape Russia’s approach to Arctic governance? And what is the role of military and economic security in Russia’s Arctic policy? The article uses a comparative method combined with discourse analysis to establish a change in Russia’s view on Arctic governance before and after the war in Ukraine.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-01-17
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7313
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7313
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7313
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7313
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7313/3576
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Angela Borozna
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Angela Borozna
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 12 (2024): Arctic Regional Governance: Actors and Transformations
2183-2463
10.17645/pag.i377
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137010789646336