Portuguese Consensus and Recommendations for Acquired Coagulopathic Bleeding Management (CCBM)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gomes, M
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Rodrigues, A, Carrilho, A, Aguiar, J, Gonçalves, L, Fernandez-Llimos, F, Duarte-Ramos, F, Rodrigues, J
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/133461
Resumo: We aimed to determine how Portuguese physicians handle major bleeding. We also aim to establish global diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations to be followed in clinical practice by using a step-wise approach of evidence generation. This study followed a three-step process: a steering committee desk review, a Delphi technique, an expert panel meeting. A modified 3-round Delphi including 31 statements was performed. Questions were answered in a five-point Likert-type scale. Consensus threshold was established as a percentage of agreement among participants >= 90% in the first round, and >= 85% in the second and third rounds. The level of consensus achieved by panelists was discussed with the scientific committee (January-2020). Fifty-one physicians participated in the study (compliance rate >90%). Analyzing the three rounds, consensus was reached on 20 items (64.5%) in the first, 4/11 items (36.4%) in the second and 6/7 items (85.7%) in the third. One statement about administration of clotting factor concentrates for bleeding control did not reach consensus. A high level of consensus was reached toward the need for implementing Patient Blood Management strategies in Portuguese hospitals, reduce exposure to allogeneic blood components, to use goal directed therapies for acquired bleeding management, and the need for evaluating blood transfusion indirect costs. A final version with 12 recommendations was built, according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Our results provide critically appraised and updated evidence on bleeding coagulopathies management in Portugal. Additional studies, mainly about indirect costs of blood transfusion, are needed.
id RCAP_22016585e1e555fb5e58b4b58f88d84c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/133461
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Portuguese Consensus and Recommendations for Acquired Coagulopathic Bleeding Management (CCBM)We aimed to determine how Portuguese physicians handle major bleeding. We also aim to establish global diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations to be followed in clinical practice by using a step-wise approach of evidence generation. This study followed a three-step process: a steering committee desk review, a Delphi technique, an expert panel meeting. A modified 3-round Delphi including 31 statements was performed. Questions were answered in a five-point Likert-type scale. Consensus threshold was established as a percentage of agreement among participants >= 90% in the first round, and >= 85% in the second and third rounds. The level of consensus achieved by panelists was discussed with the scientific committee (January-2020). Fifty-one physicians participated in the study (compliance rate >90%). Analyzing the three rounds, consensus was reached on 20 items (64.5%) in the first, 4/11 items (36.4%) in the second and 6/7 items (85.7%) in the third. One statement about administration of clotting factor concentrates for bleeding control did not reach consensus. A high level of consensus was reached toward the need for implementing Patient Blood Management strategies in Portuguese hospitals, reduce exposure to allogeneic blood components, to use goal directed therapies for acquired bleeding management, and the need for evaluating blood transfusion indirect costs. A final version with 12 recommendations was built, according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Our results provide critically appraised and updated evidence on bleeding coagulopathies management in Portugal. Additional studies, mainly about indirect costs of blood transfusion, are needed.20212021-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/133461eng1076-029610.1177/10760296211003984Gomes, MRodrigues, ACarrilho, AAguiar, JGonçalves, LFernandez-Llimos, FDuarte-Ramos, FRodrigues, Jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-29T15:28:58Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/133461Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T00:24:38.646225Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Portuguese Consensus and Recommendations for Acquired Coagulopathic Bleeding Management (CCBM)
title Portuguese Consensus and Recommendations for Acquired Coagulopathic Bleeding Management (CCBM)
spellingShingle Portuguese Consensus and Recommendations for Acquired Coagulopathic Bleeding Management (CCBM)
Gomes, M
title_short Portuguese Consensus and Recommendations for Acquired Coagulopathic Bleeding Management (CCBM)
title_full Portuguese Consensus and Recommendations for Acquired Coagulopathic Bleeding Management (CCBM)
title_fullStr Portuguese Consensus and Recommendations for Acquired Coagulopathic Bleeding Management (CCBM)
title_full_unstemmed Portuguese Consensus and Recommendations for Acquired Coagulopathic Bleeding Management (CCBM)
title_sort Portuguese Consensus and Recommendations for Acquired Coagulopathic Bleeding Management (CCBM)
author Gomes, M
author_facet Gomes, M
Rodrigues, A
Carrilho, A
Aguiar, J
Gonçalves, L
Fernandez-Llimos, F
Duarte-Ramos, F
Rodrigues, J
author_role author
author2 Rodrigues, A
Carrilho, A
Aguiar, J
Gonçalves, L
Fernandez-Llimos, F
Duarte-Ramos, F
Rodrigues, J
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gomes, M
Rodrigues, A
Carrilho, A
Aguiar, J
Gonçalves, L
Fernandez-Llimos, F
Duarte-Ramos, F
Rodrigues, J
description We aimed to determine how Portuguese physicians handle major bleeding. We also aim to establish global diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations to be followed in clinical practice by using a step-wise approach of evidence generation. This study followed a three-step process: a steering committee desk review, a Delphi technique, an expert panel meeting. A modified 3-round Delphi including 31 statements was performed. Questions were answered in a five-point Likert-type scale. Consensus threshold was established as a percentage of agreement among participants >= 90% in the first round, and >= 85% in the second and third rounds. The level of consensus achieved by panelists was discussed with the scientific committee (January-2020). Fifty-one physicians participated in the study (compliance rate >90%). Analyzing the three rounds, consensus was reached on 20 items (64.5%) in the first, 4/11 items (36.4%) in the second and 6/7 items (85.7%) in the third. One statement about administration of clotting factor concentrates for bleeding control did not reach consensus. A high level of consensus was reached toward the need for implementing Patient Blood Management strategies in Portuguese hospitals, reduce exposure to allogeneic blood components, to use goal directed therapies for acquired bleeding management, and the need for evaluating blood transfusion indirect costs. A final version with 12 recommendations was built, according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Our results provide critically appraised and updated evidence on bleeding coagulopathies management in Portugal. Additional studies, mainly about indirect costs of blood transfusion, are needed.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10216/133461
url https://hdl.handle.net/10216/133461
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1076-0296
10.1177/10760296211003984
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136161148436480