The concept of futility in health: A scoping review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: da Silva Vieira, João
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Deodato, Sérgio, Mendes, Felismina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10174/31189
https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1477750920977109
Resumo: Introduction Due to the constant scientific and technological development, health professionals are regularly confronted with situations in which there are always therapeutic options, regardless of the severity of the patient’s condition. However, regarding these therapeutic options as feasible in all situations can be harmful, since it is universally accepted that, despite all advances in health, there are inevitable limits and the promotion of some interventions may be useless or futile. Objective To characterize the use of the concept of futility in the health literature. Method Review of the literature following the Scoping Review protocol of the Joanna Briggs Institute. The research was performed in CINAHL, Cochrane, Pubmed, Scopus e Web of Science to identify studies published prior to 2020. Nineteen studies were selected. Results There is no universally accepted definition for the concept of futility. In the literature there are different conceptions for the concept of futility that point to qualitative and quantitative roots and that are associated with ethical dilemmas that make it difficult to conceptualize this concept and make it operational in clinical practice. Conclusion The central elements of the concept of futility include: the diagnosis of futility is closely related to clinical judgment; futility has both quantitative and qualitative roots; futility is always appreciated posteriori; futility is related to the lack of benefit. It is essential to promote a discussion that enables the definition of the concept and that makes it possible to promote ethical principles in care, especially when the inevitable limits of treatments are reached.
id RCAP_22f2ad75ec6aba80d580a339596b2c31
oai_identifier_str oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/31189
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling The concept of futility in health: A scoping reviewBioethicsclinical ethicsethicsmedical futilityprofessional ethicsIntroduction Due to the constant scientific and technological development, health professionals are regularly confronted with situations in which there are always therapeutic options, regardless of the severity of the patient’s condition. However, regarding these therapeutic options as feasible in all situations can be harmful, since it is universally accepted that, despite all advances in health, there are inevitable limits and the promotion of some interventions may be useless or futile. Objective To characterize the use of the concept of futility in the health literature. Method Review of the literature following the Scoping Review protocol of the Joanna Briggs Institute. The research was performed in CINAHL, Cochrane, Pubmed, Scopus e Web of Science to identify studies published prior to 2020. Nineteen studies were selected. Results There is no universally accepted definition for the concept of futility. In the literature there are different conceptions for the concept of futility that point to qualitative and quantitative roots and that are associated with ethical dilemmas that make it difficult to conceptualize this concept and make it operational in clinical practice. Conclusion The central elements of the concept of futility include: the diagnosis of futility is closely related to clinical judgment; futility has both quantitative and qualitative roots; futility is always appreciated posteriori; futility is related to the lack of benefit. It is essential to promote a discussion that enables the definition of the concept and that makes it possible to promote ethical principles in care, especially when the inevitable limits of treatments are reached.2022-02-23T15:15:45Z2022-02-232020-11-26T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/31189http://hdl.handle.net/10174/31189https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1477750920977109porda Silva Vieira JV, Deodato S, Mendes F. The concept of futility in health: A scoping review. Clinical Ethics. 2021;16(4):347-353. doi:10.1177/1477750920977109ndndfm@uevora.ptda Silva Vieira, JoãoDeodato, SérgioMendes, Felisminainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T19:30:18Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/31189Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:20:21.585243Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The concept of futility in health: A scoping review
title The concept of futility in health: A scoping review
spellingShingle The concept of futility in health: A scoping review
da Silva Vieira, João
Bioethics
clinical ethics
ethics
medical futility
professional ethics
title_short The concept of futility in health: A scoping review
title_full The concept of futility in health: A scoping review
title_fullStr The concept of futility in health: A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed The concept of futility in health: A scoping review
title_sort The concept of futility in health: A scoping review
author da Silva Vieira, João
author_facet da Silva Vieira, João
Deodato, Sérgio
Mendes, Felismina
author_role author
author2 Deodato, Sérgio
Mendes, Felismina
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv da Silva Vieira, João
Deodato, Sérgio
Mendes, Felismina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bioethics
clinical ethics
ethics
medical futility
professional ethics
topic Bioethics
clinical ethics
ethics
medical futility
professional ethics
description Introduction Due to the constant scientific and technological development, health professionals are regularly confronted with situations in which there are always therapeutic options, regardless of the severity of the patient’s condition. However, regarding these therapeutic options as feasible in all situations can be harmful, since it is universally accepted that, despite all advances in health, there are inevitable limits and the promotion of some interventions may be useless or futile. Objective To characterize the use of the concept of futility in the health literature. Method Review of the literature following the Scoping Review protocol of the Joanna Briggs Institute. The research was performed in CINAHL, Cochrane, Pubmed, Scopus e Web of Science to identify studies published prior to 2020. Nineteen studies were selected. Results There is no universally accepted definition for the concept of futility. In the literature there are different conceptions for the concept of futility that point to qualitative and quantitative roots and that are associated with ethical dilemmas that make it difficult to conceptualize this concept and make it operational in clinical practice. Conclusion The central elements of the concept of futility include: the diagnosis of futility is closely related to clinical judgment; futility has both quantitative and qualitative roots; futility is always appreciated posteriori; futility is related to the lack of benefit. It is essential to promote a discussion that enables the definition of the concept and that makes it possible to promote ethical principles in care, especially when the inevitable limits of treatments are reached.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-26T00:00:00Z
2022-02-23T15:15:45Z
2022-02-23
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10174/31189
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/31189
https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1477750920977109
url http://hdl.handle.net/10174/31189
https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1477750920977109
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv da Silva Vieira JV, Deodato S, Mendes F. The concept of futility in health: A scoping review. Clinical Ethics. 2021;16(4):347-353. doi:10.1177/1477750920977109
nd
nd
fm@uevora.pt
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136685036929024