SENTINEL NODE BIOPSY IN PORTUGAL - THE EXPERIENCE OF A REFERENCE A CENTER
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
DOI: | 10.29021/spdv.71.4.208 |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.71.4.208 |
Resumo: | Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is undertaken as a standard procedure for patients with localized cutaneous melanoma. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) melanoma panel has reinforced the status of Sentinel lymph node biopsy as the most important prognostic factor for disease survival.Objectives: We sought to identify predictive factors associated with positive SLN biopsy and correlation with overall survival in our population.Methods: A retrospective chart review of 221 patients who had undergone successful Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma between 2004 and 2010 at our department was done. Univariate and multivariate analyzes were performed.Results: Sixty-one point five percent of patients were women and the mean age was 59.3 years. Most of the primary lesions were located on the lower limbs (43%), mainly on the feet (21.3%). The Sentinel lymph node biopsy was positive in 48 patients (21.7%). Univariate analysis showed that male gender, increasing Breslow thickness, tumor type, and presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were significantly associated with a positive Sentinel lymph node biopsy. Multivariate analysis confirmed that Breslow thickness and the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are independently predictive of Sentinel lymph node metastasis. The 5-year survival rates were 53.1% for Sentinel lymph node positive patients and 88.2% for SLN negative patients. Breslow thickness and the Sentinel lymph node status independently predict overall survival.Conclusions: The risk factors for positive Sentinel lymph node biopsy in our study were consistent with those previous found in the literature. In addition, Sentinel lymph node status is a major determinant for survival, which highlights its importance in melanoma management. |
id |
RCAP_23aff995c38cb401319d8738f23a9107 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/208 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
SENTINEL NODE BIOPSY IN PORTUGAL - THE EXPERIENCE OF A REFERENCE A CENTERBIOPSIA DE GÂNGLIO SENTINELA EM PORTUGAL – EXPERIÊNCIA DE UM CENTRO DE REFERÊNCIASentinel lymph node biopsySurvival analysisMelanomaBiopsia de gânglio sentinelaFactores de prognósticoSobrevivênciaMelanomaBackground: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is undertaken as a standard procedure for patients with localized cutaneous melanoma. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) melanoma panel has reinforced the status of Sentinel lymph node biopsy as the most important prognostic factor for disease survival.Objectives: We sought to identify predictive factors associated with positive SLN biopsy and correlation with overall survival in our population.Methods: A retrospective chart review of 221 patients who had undergone successful Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma between 2004 and 2010 at our department was done. Univariate and multivariate analyzes were performed.Results: Sixty-one point five percent of patients were women and the mean age was 59.3 years. Most of the primary lesions were located on the lower limbs (43%), mainly on the feet (21.3%). The Sentinel lymph node biopsy was positive in 48 patients (21.7%). Univariate analysis showed that male gender, increasing Breslow thickness, tumor type, and presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were significantly associated with a positive Sentinel lymph node biopsy. Multivariate analysis confirmed that Breslow thickness and the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are independently predictive of Sentinel lymph node metastasis. The 5-year survival rates were 53.1% for Sentinel lymph node positive patients and 88.2% for SLN negative patients. Breslow thickness and the Sentinel lymph node status independently predict overall survival.Conclusions: The risk factors for positive Sentinel lymph node biopsy in our study were consistent with those previous found in the literature. In addition, Sentinel lymph node status is a major determinant for survival, which highlights its importance in melanoma management.Introdução: A biopsia de gânglio sentinela é o método de escolha actual para o correcto estadiamento de doentes com melanoma cutâneo localizado. As guidelines do National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) reforçam o papel do status do gânglio sentinela como o factor de prognóstico mais importante na sobrevivência.Objectivos: Investigamos factores preditivos de gânglio sentinela positivo e factores que influenciam a sobrevivência na nossa população.Material e métodos: Realizámos um estudo retrospectivo de 221 doentes que foram submetidos a biopsia de gânglio sentinela durante o período entre 2004 e 2010 na Unidade de Cirurgia Dermatológica do Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra. Foram aplicados métodos de análise estatística univariada e multivariada.Resultados: Os doentes do sexo feminino representavam 61% da população estudada e a idade média era de 59,3 anos. A maioria das lesões localizava-se nos membros inferiores (43%), sobretudo no pé (21,3% de todas as lesões). A biopsia de gânglio sentinela foi positiva em 48 casos (21,7%). A análise univariada determinou os seguintes factores preditivos de biopsia de gânglio sentinela positiva: sexo masculino, espessura de Breslow, tipo histológico e presença de infiltrado linfocítico. A análise multivariada confirmou o valor preditivo da espessura de Breslow e do infiltrado linfocítico. A taxa de sobrevivência aos 5 anos correspondia ao valor de 53,1% no grupo biopsia de gânglio sentinela positiva e 88,2% no grupo biopsia de gânglio sentinela negativa. A espessura de Breslow e o status do gânglio sentinela são factores independentes do prognóstico destes doentes.Conclusões: Os factores de risco para biopsia de gânglio sentinela positiva são consistentes com os dados da literatura. O status do gânglio sentinela permanece o principal determinante da sobrevivência, facto que reforça a relevância da biopsia de gânglio sentinela no estadiamento de doentes com esta neoplasia cutânea.Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia2014-07-06T00:00:00Zjournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.71.4.208oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/208Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology; Vol 71 No 4 (2013): Outubro - Dezembro; 477-485Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia; v. 71 n. 4 (2013): Outubro - Dezembro; 477-4852182-24092182-2395reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/208https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.71.4.208https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/208/192Teixeira, VeraVieira, RicardoCoutinho, InêsCabral, RitaAndrade, PedroJulião, Maria JoséBrites, Maria ManuelAlbuquerque, AnabelaLima, João PedrosoFigueiredo, Américoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-10-06T12:34:45Zoai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/208Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:10:45.743937Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
SENTINEL NODE BIOPSY IN PORTUGAL - THE EXPERIENCE OF A REFERENCE A CENTER BIOPSIA DE GÂNGLIO SENTINELA EM PORTUGAL – EXPERIÊNCIA DE UM CENTRO DE REFERÊNCIA |
title |
SENTINEL NODE BIOPSY IN PORTUGAL - THE EXPERIENCE OF A REFERENCE A CENTER |
spellingShingle |
SENTINEL NODE BIOPSY IN PORTUGAL - THE EXPERIENCE OF A REFERENCE A CENTER SENTINEL NODE BIOPSY IN PORTUGAL - THE EXPERIENCE OF A REFERENCE A CENTER Teixeira, Vera Sentinel lymph node biopsy Survival analysis Melanoma Biopsia de gânglio sentinela Factores de prognóstico Sobrevivência Melanoma Teixeira, Vera Sentinel lymph node biopsy Survival analysis Melanoma Biopsia de gânglio sentinela Factores de prognóstico Sobrevivência Melanoma |
title_short |
SENTINEL NODE BIOPSY IN PORTUGAL - THE EXPERIENCE OF A REFERENCE A CENTER |
title_full |
SENTINEL NODE BIOPSY IN PORTUGAL - THE EXPERIENCE OF A REFERENCE A CENTER |
title_fullStr |
SENTINEL NODE BIOPSY IN PORTUGAL - THE EXPERIENCE OF A REFERENCE A CENTER SENTINEL NODE BIOPSY IN PORTUGAL - THE EXPERIENCE OF A REFERENCE A CENTER |
title_full_unstemmed |
SENTINEL NODE BIOPSY IN PORTUGAL - THE EXPERIENCE OF A REFERENCE A CENTER SENTINEL NODE BIOPSY IN PORTUGAL - THE EXPERIENCE OF A REFERENCE A CENTER |
title_sort |
SENTINEL NODE BIOPSY IN PORTUGAL - THE EXPERIENCE OF A REFERENCE A CENTER |
author |
Teixeira, Vera |
author_facet |
Teixeira, Vera Teixeira, Vera Vieira, Ricardo Coutinho, Inês Cabral, Rita Andrade, Pedro Julião, Maria José Brites, Maria Manuel Albuquerque, Anabela Lima, João Pedroso Figueiredo, Américo Vieira, Ricardo Coutinho, Inês Cabral, Rita Andrade, Pedro Julião, Maria José Brites, Maria Manuel Albuquerque, Anabela Lima, João Pedroso Figueiredo, Américo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vieira, Ricardo Coutinho, Inês Cabral, Rita Andrade, Pedro Julião, Maria José Brites, Maria Manuel Albuquerque, Anabela Lima, João Pedroso Figueiredo, Américo |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Teixeira, Vera Vieira, Ricardo Coutinho, Inês Cabral, Rita Andrade, Pedro Julião, Maria José Brites, Maria Manuel Albuquerque, Anabela Lima, João Pedroso Figueiredo, Américo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sentinel lymph node biopsy Survival analysis Melanoma Biopsia de gânglio sentinela Factores de prognóstico Sobrevivência Melanoma |
topic |
Sentinel lymph node biopsy Survival analysis Melanoma Biopsia de gânglio sentinela Factores de prognóstico Sobrevivência Melanoma |
description |
Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is undertaken as a standard procedure for patients with localized cutaneous melanoma. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) melanoma panel has reinforced the status of Sentinel lymph node biopsy as the most important prognostic factor for disease survival.Objectives: We sought to identify predictive factors associated with positive SLN biopsy and correlation with overall survival in our population.Methods: A retrospective chart review of 221 patients who had undergone successful Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma between 2004 and 2010 at our department was done. Univariate and multivariate analyzes were performed.Results: Sixty-one point five percent of patients were women and the mean age was 59.3 years. Most of the primary lesions were located on the lower limbs (43%), mainly on the feet (21.3%). The Sentinel lymph node biopsy was positive in 48 patients (21.7%). Univariate analysis showed that male gender, increasing Breslow thickness, tumor type, and presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were significantly associated with a positive Sentinel lymph node biopsy. Multivariate analysis confirmed that Breslow thickness and the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are independently predictive of Sentinel lymph node metastasis. The 5-year survival rates were 53.1% for Sentinel lymph node positive patients and 88.2% for SLN negative patients. Breslow thickness and the Sentinel lymph node status independently predict overall survival.Conclusions: The risk factors for positive Sentinel lymph node biopsy in our study were consistent with those previous found in the literature. In addition, Sentinel lymph node status is a major determinant for survival, which highlights its importance in melanoma management. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-07-06T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
journal article info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.71.4.208 oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/208 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.71.4.208 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/208 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/208 https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.71.4.208 https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/208/192 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology; Vol 71 No 4 (2013): Outubro - Dezembro; 477-485 Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia; v. 71 n. 4 (2013): Outubro - Dezembro; 477-485 2182-2409 2182-2395 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1822183445147680768 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.29021/spdv.71.4.208 |