Recognition of COVID-19 with occupational origin: a comparison between European countries
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://hdl.handle.net/10216/156284 |
Resumo: | Objectives This study aims to present an overview of the formal recognition of COVID-19 as occupational disease (OD) or injury (OI) across Europe. Methods A COVID-19 questionnaire was designed by a task group within COST-funded OMEGA-NET and sent to occupational health experts of 37 countries in WHO European region, with a last update in April 2022. Results The questionnaire was filled out by experts from 35 countries. There are large differences between national systems regarding the recognition of OD and OI: 40% of countries have a list system, 57% a mixed system and one country an open system. In most countries, COVID-19 can be recognised as an OD (57%). In four countries, COVID-19 can be recognised as OI (11%) and in seven countries as either OD or OI (20%). In two countries, there is no recognition possible to date. Thirty-two countries (91%) recognise COVID-19 as OD/OI among healthcare workers. Working in certain jobs is considered proof of occupational exposure in 25 countries, contact with a colleague with confirmed infection in 19 countries, and contact with clients with confirmed infection in 21 countries. In most countries (57%), a positive PCR test is considered proof of disease. The three most common compensation benefits for COVID-19 as OI/OD are disability pension, treatment and rehabilitation. Long COVID is included in 26 countries. Conclusions COVID-19 can be recognised as OD or OI in 94% of the European countries completing this survey, across different social security and embedded occupational health systems. |
id |
RCAP_23ba120b81a84f4bb07df8f5e229ba14 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/156284 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Recognition of COVID-19 with occupational origin: a comparison between European countriesObjectives This study aims to present an overview of the formal recognition of COVID-19 as occupational disease (OD) or injury (OI) across Europe. Methods A COVID-19 questionnaire was designed by a task group within COST-funded OMEGA-NET and sent to occupational health experts of 37 countries in WHO European region, with a last update in April 2022. Results The questionnaire was filled out by experts from 35 countries. There are large differences between national systems regarding the recognition of OD and OI: 40% of countries have a list system, 57% a mixed system and one country an open system. In most countries, COVID-19 can be recognised as an OD (57%). In four countries, COVID-19 can be recognised as OI (11%) and in seven countries as either OD or OI (20%). In two countries, there is no recognition possible to date. Thirty-two countries (91%) recognise COVID-19 as OD/OI among healthcare workers. Working in certain jobs is considered proof of occupational exposure in 25 countries, contact with a colleague with confirmed infection in 19 countries, and contact with clients with confirmed infection in 21 countries. In most countries (57%), a positive PCR test is considered proof of disease. The three most common compensation benefits for COVID-19 as OI/OD are disability pension, treatment and rehabilitation. Long COVID is included in 26 countries. Conclusions COVID-19 can be recognised as OD or OI in 94% of the European countries completing this survey, across different social security and embedded occupational health systems.BMJ Publishing Group20232023-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/156284eng1351-07111470-792610.1136/oemed-2022-108726Nys, EPauwels, SÁdám, BAmaro, JAthanasiou, ABashkin, OBric, TKBulat, PCaglayan, CGuseva, Canu, ICebanu, SCharbotel, BCirule, JCurti, SDavidovitch, NDopelt, KFikfak, MDFrilander, HGustavsson, PHöper, ACKiran, SKogevinas, MKudász, FKolstad, HALazarevic, SBMacan, JMajery, NMarinaccio, AMates, DMattioli, SMcElvenny, DMMediouni, ZMehlum, ISMerisalu, EMijakoski, DNena, ENoone, POtelea, MRPelclova, DPranjic, NRosso, MSerra, CRushton, LSandal, ASchernhammer, ESStoleski, STurner, MCvan der Molen, HFVarga, MWalusiak-Skorupa, JStraif, KGodderis, Linfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-12T01:25:45Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/156284Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:35:54.534433Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Recognition of COVID-19 with occupational origin: a comparison between European countries |
title |
Recognition of COVID-19 with occupational origin: a comparison between European countries |
spellingShingle |
Recognition of COVID-19 with occupational origin: a comparison between European countries Nys, E |
title_short |
Recognition of COVID-19 with occupational origin: a comparison between European countries |
title_full |
Recognition of COVID-19 with occupational origin: a comparison between European countries |
title_fullStr |
Recognition of COVID-19 with occupational origin: a comparison between European countries |
title_full_unstemmed |
Recognition of COVID-19 with occupational origin: a comparison between European countries |
title_sort |
Recognition of COVID-19 with occupational origin: a comparison between European countries |
author |
Nys, E |
author_facet |
Nys, E Pauwels, S Ádám, B Amaro, J Athanasiou, A Bashkin, O Bric, TK Bulat, P Caglayan, C Guseva, Canu, I Cebanu, S Charbotel, B Cirule, J Curti, S Davidovitch, N Dopelt, K Fikfak, MD Frilander, H Gustavsson, P Höper, AC Kiran, S Kogevinas, M Kudász, F Kolstad, HA Lazarevic, SB Macan, J Majery, N Marinaccio, A Mates, D Mattioli, S McElvenny, DM Mediouni, Z Mehlum, IS Merisalu, E Mijakoski, D Nena, E Noone, P Otelea, MR Pelclova, D Pranjic, N Rosso, M Serra, C Rushton, L Sandal, A Schernhammer, ES Stoleski, S Turner, MC van der Molen, HF Varga, M Walusiak-Skorupa, J Straif, K Godderis, L |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pauwels, S Ádám, B Amaro, J Athanasiou, A Bashkin, O Bric, TK Bulat, P Caglayan, C Guseva, Canu, I Cebanu, S Charbotel, B Cirule, J Curti, S Davidovitch, N Dopelt, K Fikfak, MD Frilander, H Gustavsson, P Höper, AC Kiran, S Kogevinas, M Kudász, F Kolstad, HA Lazarevic, SB Macan, J Majery, N Marinaccio, A Mates, D Mattioli, S McElvenny, DM Mediouni, Z Mehlum, IS Merisalu, E Mijakoski, D Nena, E Noone, P Otelea, MR Pelclova, D Pranjic, N Rosso, M Serra, C Rushton, L Sandal, A Schernhammer, ES Stoleski, S Turner, MC van der Molen, HF Varga, M Walusiak-Skorupa, J Straif, K Godderis, L |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nys, E Pauwels, S Ádám, B Amaro, J Athanasiou, A Bashkin, O Bric, TK Bulat, P Caglayan, C Guseva, Canu, I Cebanu, S Charbotel, B Cirule, J Curti, S Davidovitch, N Dopelt, K Fikfak, MD Frilander, H Gustavsson, P Höper, AC Kiran, S Kogevinas, M Kudász, F Kolstad, HA Lazarevic, SB Macan, J Majery, N Marinaccio, A Mates, D Mattioli, S McElvenny, DM Mediouni, Z Mehlum, IS Merisalu, E Mijakoski, D Nena, E Noone, P Otelea, MR Pelclova, D Pranjic, N Rosso, M Serra, C Rushton, L Sandal, A Schernhammer, ES Stoleski, S Turner, MC van der Molen, HF Varga, M Walusiak-Skorupa, J Straif, K Godderis, L |
description |
Objectives This study aims to present an overview of the formal recognition of COVID-19 as occupational disease (OD) or injury (OI) across Europe. Methods A COVID-19 questionnaire was designed by a task group within COST-funded OMEGA-NET and sent to occupational health experts of 37 countries in WHO European region, with a last update in April 2022. Results The questionnaire was filled out by experts from 35 countries. There are large differences between national systems regarding the recognition of OD and OI: 40% of countries have a list system, 57% a mixed system and one country an open system. In most countries, COVID-19 can be recognised as an OD (57%). In four countries, COVID-19 can be recognised as OI (11%) and in seven countries as either OD or OI (20%). In two countries, there is no recognition possible to date. Thirty-two countries (91%) recognise COVID-19 as OD/OI among healthcare workers. Working in certain jobs is considered proof of occupational exposure in 25 countries, contact with a colleague with confirmed infection in 19 countries, and contact with clients with confirmed infection in 21 countries. In most countries (57%), a positive PCR test is considered proof of disease. The three most common compensation benefits for COVID-19 as OI/OD are disability pension, treatment and rehabilitation. Long COVID is included in 26 countries. Conclusions COVID-19 can be recognised as OD or OI in 94% of the European countries completing this survey, across different social security and embedded occupational health systems. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/10216/156284 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10216/156284 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
1351-0711 1470-7926 10.1136/oemed-2022-108726 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
BMJ Publishing Group |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
BMJ Publishing Group |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136834276556800 |