Project management in public health
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Outros |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10362/101776 |
Resumo: | Background: Success is a central concept in project management (PM), yet the literature is relatively extensive and generalist concerning topics related to PM success. Several metrics and factors that influence the success of a project are common to diverse industries, although there are also particularities. In the case of projects and programs developed by public health action, the focus is on protection of the health of specific target groups or populations, and many of them are concerned with survival issues. Summary: As the result of a systematic literature review, this paper identifies general project success criteria and success factors and describes specific evidence for the public health field. Key messages: The success of public health projects needs to be managed systematically and evaluated with a set of comprehensive success criteria. |
id |
RCAP_24368c16e8183a336c4d926eceb9b9c2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:run.unl.pt:10362/101776 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Project management in public healtha systematic literature review on success criteria and factorsHealth planningHealth services managementProject managementPublic healthSuccess criteriaSuccess factorsHealth PolicyPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingBackground: Success is a central concept in project management (PM), yet the literature is relatively extensive and generalist concerning topics related to PM success. Several metrics and factors that influence the success of a project are common to diverse industries, although there are also particularities. In the case of projects and programs developed by public health action, the focus is on protection of the health of specific target groups or populations, and many of them are concerned with survival issues. Summary: As the result of a systematic literature review, this paper identifies general project success criteria and success factors and describes specific evidence for the public health field. Key messages: The success of public health projects needs to be managed systematically and evaluated with a set of comprehensive success criteria.Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública (ENSP)NOVA Information Management School (NOVA IMS)Information Management Research Center (MagIC) - NOVA Information Management SchoolRUNSantos, CarolinaSantos, VitorTavares, AntónioVarajão, João2020-07-30T22:44:15Z20202020-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/101776eng2504-3137PURE: 19270197https://doi.org/10.1159/000509531info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-05-22T17:46:50Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/101776Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-05-22T17:46:50Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Project management in public health a systematic literature review on success criteria and factors |
title |
Project management in public health |
spellingShingle |
Project management in public health Santos, Carolina Health planning Health services management Project management Public health Success criteria Success factors Health Policy Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being |
title_short |
Project management in public health |
title_full |
Project management in public health |
title_fullStr |
Project management in public health |
title_full_unstemmed |
Project management in public health |
title_sort |
Project management in public health |
author |
Santos, Carolina |
author_facet |
Santos, Carolina Santos, Vitor Tavares, António Varajão, João |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Santos, Vitor Tavares, António Varajão, João |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública (ENSP) NOVA Information Management School (NOVA IMS) Information Management Research Center (MagIC) - NOVA Information Management School RUN |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Carolina Santos, Vitor Tavares, António Varajão, João |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Health planning Health services management Project management Public health Success criteria Success factors Health Policy Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being |
topic |
Health planning Health services management Project management Public health Success criteria Success factors Health Policy Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being |
description |
Background: Success is a central concept in project management (PM), yet the literature is relatively extensive and generalist concerning topics related to PM success. Several metrics and factors that influence the success of a project are common to diverse industries, although there are also particularities. In the case of projects and programs developed by public health action, the focus is on protection of the health of specific target groups or populations, and many of them are concerned with survival issues. Summary: As the result of a systematic literature review, this paper identifies general project success criteria and success factors and describes specific evidence for the public health field. Key messages: The success of public health projects needs to be managed systematically and evaluated with a set of comprehensive success criteria. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07-30T22:44:15Z 2020 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
other |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/101776 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/101776 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2504-3137 PURE: 19270197 https://doi.org/10.1159/000509531 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mluisa.alvim@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1817545752480579584 |