New forms of mobilization, new people mobilized? Evidence from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Magalhães, Pedro C.
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Aldrich, John H, Gibson, Rachel K
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10451/35388
Resumo: Mobilization efforts by parties and candidates during election campaigns tend to reach those who are more likely to vote in the first place. This is thought to be particularly consequential for turnout among the young. Harder and less cost-effective to reach, young adults are less mobilized and vote less often, creating a vicious circle of demobilization. However, new forms of political communication — including online and text messaging — have created expectations this circle might be broken. Is this happening? We examine data from Module 4 of the CSES surveys, looking at the prevalence of different types of party contacts in 38 countries, the profile of voters who are reached, and the effects of these efforts on turnout. New forms of party contacting do matter for turnout and partially reduce the age gap in contacting, but still fail to compensate for the much larger differentials that persist in traditional forms of contacting.
id RCAP_248f8b637eb075abaad12d772336a885
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/35388
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling New forms of mobilization, new people mobilized? Evidence from the Comparative Study of Electoral SystemsMobilizationParty contactsTurnoutMobilization efforts by parties and candidates during election campaigns tend to reach those who are more likely to vote in the first place. This is thought to be particularly consequential for turnout among the young. Harder and less cost-effective to reach, young adults are less mobilized and vote less often, creating a vicious circle of demobilization. However, new forms of political communication — including online and text messaging — have created expectations this circle might be broken. Is this happening? We examine data from Module 4 of the CSES surveys, looking at the prevalence of different types of party contacts in 38 countries, the profile of voters who are reached, and the effects of these efforts on turnout. New forms of party contacting do matter for turnout and partially reduce the age gap in contacting, but still fail to compensate for the much larger differentials that persist in traditional forms of contacting.SAGE PublicationsRepositório da Universidade de LisboaMagalhães, Pedro C.Aldrich, John HGibson, Rachel K2018-11-20T12:23:11Z20202020-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/35388engAccepted version of: Magalhães, P. C., Aldrich, J. H., & Gibson, R. K. (2020). New forms of mobilization, new people mobilized? Evidence from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. Party Politics, 26(5), 605–618 (Published Online 2018).1354-068810.1177/1354068818797367info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-08T16:31:18Zoai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/35388Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:49:51.306959Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv New forms of mobilization, new people mobilized? Evidence from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems
title New forms of mobilization, new people mobilized? Evidence from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems
spellingShingle New forms of mobilization, new people mobilized? Evidence from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems
Magalhães, Pedro C.
Mobilization
Party contacts
Turnout
title_short New forms of mobilization, new people mobilized? Evidence from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems
title_full New forms of mobilization, new people mobilized? Evidence from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems
title_fullStr New forms of mobilization, new people mobilized? Evidence from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems
title_full_unstemmed New forms of mobilization, new people mobilized? Evidence from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems
title_sort New forms of mobilization, new people mobilized? Evidence from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems
author Magalhães, Pedro C.
author_facet Magalhães, Pedro C.
Aldrich, John H
Gibson, Rachel K
author_role author
author2 Aldrich, John H
Gibson, Rachel K
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Magalhães, Pedro C.
Aldrich, John H
Gibson, Rachel K
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Mobilization
Party contacts
Turnout
topic Mobilization
Party contacts
Turnout
description Mobilization efforts by parties and candidates during election campaigns tend to reach those who are more likely to vote in the first place. This is thought to be particularly consequential for turnout among the young. Harder and less cost-effective to reach, young adults are less mobilized and vote less often, creating a vicious circle of demobilization. However, new forms of political communication — including online and text messaging — have created expectations this circle might be broken. Is this happening? We examine data from Module 4 of the CSES surveys, looking at the prevalence of different types of party contacts in 38 countries, the profile of voters who are reached, and the effects of these efforts on turnout. New forms of party contacting do matter for turnout and partially reduce the age gap in contacting, but still fail to compensate for the much larger differentials that persist in traditional forms of contacting.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-11-20T12:23:11Z
2020
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10451/35388
url http://hdl.handle.net/10451/35388
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Accepted version of: Magalhães, P. C., Aldrich, J. H., & Gibson, R. K. (2020). New forms of mobilization, new people mobilized? Evidence from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. Party Politics, 26(5), 605–618 (Published Online 2018).
1354-0688
10.1177/1354068818797367
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SAGE Publications
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SAGE Publications
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134432434585600