Salus Platform: A Digital Health Solution Tool for Managing Syphilis Cases in Brazil—A Comparative Analysis

• Autor(a) principal: Pinto, Talita Katiane de Brito
• Data de Publicação: 2023
• Outros Autores: Lima, Thaisa Gois Farias de Moura Santos, Oliveira, Aliete Cristina Gomes Dias Pedrosa da Cunha, Noronha, André, Brito, Cintia, Farias, Fernando, Morais, Sedir, Paiva, Jailton, Honorato, Cintia, Queirós, Paulo Joaquim Pina, Gómez-Cantarino, Sagrario, Lucena, Márcia, Valentim, Ricardo Alexsandro de Medeiros
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
• Texto Completo: https://doi.org/info:doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20075258
• topic: Salus; acquired syphilis; maternal syphilis; congenital syphilis; information system; primary attention; sexual infection; epidemiological monitoring

(1) Introduction: Syphilis is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) that constitutes a serious public health problem in Brazil and worldwide; (2) Methods: This was a descriptive and exploratory study that sought to analyze and compare the characteristics of Brazilian health systems with a new platform (Salus) developed by the Laboratory of Technological Innovation in Health in the scope of notification and management of disease data, including syphilis. In addition, this analysis aimed to assess whether Salus fully meets the necessary data management fields and can be indicated as a tool to improve health management in the context of syphilis in Brazil. (3) Results: In this study, the Salus functionalities were demonstrated and compared with the current Brazilian systems by discovering the existing gaps in the evaluated systems. The gaps found may explain the delay in meeting demands, the difficulty of making routine therapeutic follow-ups, in addition to interference with the vital purpose of follow-up in the epidemiological surveillance of diseases. As a result, Salus demonstrates functionalities that surpass all others and meet case management demands in a superior way to the systems currently used in the country. (4) Conclusions: The Brazilian health information systems related to the response to syphilis do not fulfill the purpose for which they were developed. Instead, they contribute to the fragmentation of health data and information, delays in diagnosis, incomplete case management, and loss of data due to inconsistencies and inadequate reporting. In addition, they are systems without interconnection, which do not articulate epidemiological surveillance actions with primary health care. All these factors may be obscuring accurate data on syphilis in Brazil, resulting in high and unnecessary public spending and late care for users of the Unified Health System (SUS).