Mechanical versus manual harvest of Pinus pinea cones

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gonçalves, Ana Cristina
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Dias, António Bento, Afonso, Anabela, Pereira, Dulce G., Pinheiro, Anacleto, Peça, José OLiveira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10174/17241
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.01.004
Resumo: Umbrella pine cone production is an important forest non-wood product in Portugal,especially in the region of Alcácer do Sal, where it plays an important role to the local development. Traditionally umbrella pine cones are manually harvested, increasing production costs and, above all, with very high accident risk to the workers. The development of equipment for mechanical harvesting started in Italy in the 1980's. Studies report different values for harvesting efficiency and tree damage, the latter in terms of immature cones and branches detached. In this study a trunk shaker was used to evaluate mechanical harvesting both in terms of efficiency and tree damage induced by trunk vibration. In comparison to the manual process, time required for mechanised harvesting was about 1/15th of the time. The results revealed a mechanical harvesting efficiency higher than 86% with negligible tree damage. Inter-annual harvest efficiency variability was also observed.
id RCAP_26a41905494c9fe46b0351a142081134
oai_identifier_str oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/17241
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Mechanical versus manual harvest of Pinus pinea conesDamageHarvest efficiencyTime of detachmentTree dimensionTrunk shakerUmbrella pine cone production is an important forest non-wood product in Portugal,especially in the region of Alcácer do Sal, where it plays an important role to the local development. Traditionally umbrella pine cones are manually harvested, increasing production costs and, above all, with very high accident risk to the workers. The development of equipment for mechanical harvesting started in Italy in the 1980's. Studies report different values for harvesting efficiency and tree damage, the latter in terms of immature cones and branches detached. In this study a trunk shaker was used to evaluate mechanical harvesting both in terms of efficiency and tree damage induced by trunk vibration. In comparison to the manual process, time required for mechanised harvesting was about 1/15th of the time. The results revealed a mechanical harvesting efficiency higher than 86% with negligible tree damage. Inter-annual harvest efficiency variability was also observed.Elsevier2016-02-03T12:33:44Z2016-02-032016-03-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/17241http://hdl.handle.net/10174/17241https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.01.004engGonçalves, A. C.; Dias; A. B.; Afonso, A.; Pereia, D. G.; Pinheiro, A.; Peça, J. O.; 2016. Mechanical versus manual harvest of Pinus pinea cones. Biosystems Engineering, 143. 50-60. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.01.004acag@uevora.ptadias@uevora.ptaafonso@uevora.ptdgsp@uevora.ptpinheiro@uevora.ptjmop@uevora.pt578Gonçalves, Ana CristinaDias, António BentoAfonso, AnabelaPereira, Dulce G.Pinheiro, AnacletoPeça, José OLiveirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T19:04:38Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/17241Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:09:27.775599Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Mechanical versus manual harvest of Pinus pinea cones
title Mechanical versus manual harvest of Pinus pinea cones
spellingShingle Mechanical versus manual harvest of Pinus pinea cones
Gonçalves, Ana Cristina
Damage
Harvest efficiency
Time of detachment
Tree dimension
Trunk shaker
title_short Mechanical versus manual harvest of Pinus pinea cones
title_full Mechanical versus manual harvest of Pinus pinea cones
title_fullStr Mechanical versus manual harvest of Pinus pinea cones
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical versus manual harvest of Pinus pinea cones
title_sort Mechanical versus manual harvest of Pinus pinea cones
author Gonçalves, Ana Cristina
author_facet Gonçalves, Ana Cristina
Dias, António Bento
Afonso, Anabela
Pereira, Dulce G.
Pinheiro, Anacleto
Peça, José OLiveira
author_role author
author2 Dias, António Bento
Afonso, Anabela
Pereira, Dulce G.
Pinheiro, Anacleto
Peça, José OLiveira
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gonçalves, Ana Cristina
Dias, António Bento
Afonso, Anabela
Pereira, Dulce G.
Pinheiro, Anacleto
Peça, José OLiveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Damage
Harvest efficiency
Time of detachment
Tree dimension
Trunk shaker
topic Damage
Harvest efficiency
Time of detachment
Tree dimension
Trunk shaker
description Umbrella pine cone production is an important forest non-wood product in Portugal,especially in the region of Alcácer do Sal, where it plays an important role to the local development. Traditionally umbrella pine cones are manually harvested, increasing production costs and, above all, with very high accident risk to the workers. The development of equipment for mechanical harvesting started in Italy in the 1980's. Studies report different values for harvesting efficiency and tree damage, the latter in terms of immature cones and branches detached. In this study a trunk shaker was used to evaluate mechanical harvesting both in terms of efficiency and tree damage induced by trunk vibration. In comparison to the manual process, time required for mechanised harvesting was about 1/15th of the time. The results revealed a mechanical harvesting efficiency higher than 86% with negligible tree damage. Inter-annual harvest efficiency variability was also observed.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-02-03T12:33:44Z
2016-02-03
2016-03-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10174/17241
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/17241
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.01.004
url http://hdl.handle.net/10174/17241
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.01.004
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Gonçalves, A. C.; Dias; A. B.; Afonso, A.; Pereia, D. G.; Pinheiro, A.; Peça, J. O.; 2016. Mechanical versus manual harvest of Pinus pinea cones. Biosystems Engineering, 143. 50-60. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.01.004
acag@uevora.pt
adias@uevora.pt
aafonso@uevora.pt
dgsp@uevora.pt
pinheiro@uevora.pt
jmop@uevora.pt
578
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136577189838848