Integrating Recovery within a Resilience Framework: Empirical Insights and Policy Implications from Regional Australia
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i4.741 |
Resumo: | Within Australia’s federal system, responsibility for preventing, preparing for, responding to and recovering from natural disasters is shared between the three tiers of government. Intergovernmental policy and funding arrangements are premised on shared responsibility and aim to foster individual, business and community resilience. These arrangements underpin Australia’s international reputation for effectiveness in its management of natural disasters. The capacity of the diverse networks that comprise the disaster management system to coordinate and deliver in the preparedness and response phases of a disaster, and to provide relief in the immediate aftermath, has been developed over time and tested and refined through the experience of frequent, severe disaster events over recent decades. Less well developed is the system’s ability to support economic recovery in disaster-affected communities over the longer term. This paper presents case studies of regional communities affected by two of Australia’s most expensive and deadly natural disasters—the 2009 Victorian bushfires and the cyclones and floods that struck the state of Queensland in 2010–2011. It highlights significant gaps in policy and funding arrangements to support recovery and offers lessons for aligning recovery within a resilience framework. |
id |
RCAP_2837bb26dc29c19bc362d082607a5849 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/741 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Integrating Recovery within a Resilience Framework: Empirical Insights and Policy Implications from Regional Australiadisaster governance; disaster recovery; economic recovery; resilience policyWithin Australia’s federal system, responsibility for preventing, preparing for, responding to and recovering from natural disasters is shared between the three tiers of government. Intergovernmental policy and funding arrangements are premised on shared responsibility and aim to foster individual, business and community resilience. These arrangements underpin Australia’s international reputation for effectiveness in its management of natural disasters. The capacity of the diverse networks that comprise the disaster management system to coordinate and deliver in the preparedness and response phases of a disaster, and to provide relief in the immediate aftermath, has been developed over time and tested and refined through the experience of frequent, severe disaster events over recent decades. Less well developed is the system’s ability to support economic recovery in disaster-affected communities over the longer term. This paper presents case studies of regional communities affected by two of Australia’s most expensive and deadly natural disasters—the 2009 Victorian bushfires and the cyclones and floods that struck the state of Queensland in 2010–2011. It highlights significant gaps in policy and funding arrangements to support recovery and offers lessons for aligning recovery within a resilience framework.Cogitatio2016-12-28info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i4.741oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/741Politics and Governance; Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Disaster Policies and Governance: Promoting Community Resilience; 74-862183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/741https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i4.741https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/741/741Copyright (c) 2016 Lex Drennan, Jim McGowan, Anne Tiernanhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDrennan, LexMcGowan, JimTiernan, Anne2022-12-22T15:15:42Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/741Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:12.153259Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Integrating Recovery within a Resilience Framework: Empirical Insights and Policy Implications from Regional Australia |
title |
Integrating Recovery within a Resilience Framework: Empirical Insights and Policy Implications from Regional Australia |
spellingShingle |
Integrating Recovery within a Resilience Framework: Empirical Insights and Policy Implications from Regional Australia Drennan, Lex disaster governance; disaster recovery; economic recovery; resilience policy |
title_short |
Integrating Recovery within a Resilience Framework: Empirical Insights and Policy Implications from Regional Australia |
title_full |
Integrating Recovery within a Resilience Framework: Empirical Insights and Policy Implications from Regional Australia |
title_fullStr |
Integrating Recovery within a Resilience Framework: Empirical Insights and Policy Implications from Regional Australia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Integrating Recovery within a Resilience Framework: Empirical Insights and Policy Implications from Regional Australia |
title_sort |
Integrating Recovery within a Resilience Framework: Empirical Insights and Policy Implications from Regional Australia |
author |
Drennan, Lex |
author_facet |
Drennan, Lex McGowan, Jim Tiernan, Anne |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
McGowan, Jim Tiernan, Anne |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Drennan, Lex McGowan, Jim Tiernan, Anne |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
disaster governance; disaster recovery; economic recovery; resilience policy |
topic |
disaster governance; disaster recovery; economic recovery; resilience policy |
description |
Within Australia’s federal system, responsibility for preventing, preparing for, responding to and recovering from natural disasters is shared between the three tiers of government. Intergovernmental policy and funding arrangements are premised on shared responsibility and aim to foster individual, business and community resilience. These arrangements underpin Australia’s international reputation for effectiveness in its management of natural disasters. The capacity of the diverse networks that comprise the disaster management system to coordinate and deliver in the preparedness and response phases of a disaster, and to provide relief in the immediate aftermath, has been developed over time and tested and refined through the experience of frequent, severe disaster events over recent decades. Less well developed is the system’s ability to support economic recovery in disaster-affected communities over the longer term. This paper presents case studies of regional communities affected by two of Australia’s most expensive and deadly natural disasters—the 2009 Victorian bushfires and the cyclones and floods that struck the state of Queensland in 2010–2011. It highlights significant gaps in policy and funding arrangements to support recovery and offers lessons for aligning recovery within a resilience framework. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-12-28 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i4.741 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/741 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i4.741 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/741 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/741 https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i4.741 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/741/741 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Lex Drennan, Jim McGowan, Anne Tiernan http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Lex Drennan, Jim McGowan, Anne Tiernan http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Politics and Governance; Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Disaster Policies and Governance: Promoting Community Resilience; 74-86 2183-2463 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130668048842752 |