Can the Apgar Score be Used for International Comparisons of Newborn Health?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10216/111520 |
Resumo: | Background: The Apgar score has been shown to be predictive of neonatal mortality in clinical and population studies, but has not been used for international comparisons. We examined population-level distributions in Apgar scores and associations with neonatal mortality in Europe. Methods: Aggregate data on the 5 minute Apgar score for live births and neonatal mortality rates from countries participating in the Euro-Peristat project in 2004 and 2010 were analysed. Country level associations between the Apgar score and neonatal mortality were assessed using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Results: Twenty-three countries or regions provided data on Apgar at 5 minutes, covering 2 183 472 live births. Scores <7 ranged from 0.3% to 2.4% across countries in 2004 and 2010 and were correlated over time (q = 0.88, P < 0.01). There were large differences in healthy baby scores: scores of 10 ranged from 8.8% to 92.7% whereas scores of 9 or 10 ranged from 72.9% to 96.8%. Countries more likely to score 10 s, as opposed to 9 s, for healthy babies had lower proportions of Apgar <7 (q = 0.43, P = 0.04). Neonatal mortality rates were weakly correlated with Apgar score <7 (q = 0.06, P = 0.61), but differences over time in these two indicators were correlated (q =0.56, P = 0.02). Conclusions: Large variations in the distribution of Apgar scores likely due to national scoring practices make the Apgar score an unsuitable indicator for benchmarking newborn health across countries. However, country-level trends over time in the Apgar score may reflect real changes and merit further investigation. |
id |
RCAP_2840bb57f9c677e00447569b264f2cc2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/111520 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Can the Apgar Score be Used for International Comparisons of Newborn Health?Apgar ScoreNeonatal morbidityNeonatal mortalityHealth indicatorsBackground: The Apgar score has been shown to be predictive of neonatal mortality in clinical and population studies, but has not been used for international comparisons. We examined population-level distributions in Apgar scores and associations with neonatal mortality in Europe. Methods: Aggregate data on the 5 minute Apgar score for live births and neonatal mortality rates from countries participating in the Euro-Peristat project in 2004 and 2010 were analysed. Country level associations between the Apgar score and neonatal mortality were assessed using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Results: Twenty-three countries or regions provided data on Apgar at 5 minutes, covering 2 183 472 live births. Scores <7 ranged from 0.3% to 2.4% across countries in 2004 and 2010 and were correlated over time (q = 0.88, P < 0.01). There were large differences in healthy baby scores: scores of 10 ranged from 8.8% to 92.7% whereas scores of 9 or 10 ranged from 72.9% to 96.8%. Countries more likely to score 10 s, as opposed to 9 s, for healthy babies had lower proportions of Apgar <7 (q = 0.43, P = 0.04). Neonatal mortality rates were weakly correlated with Apgar score <7 (q = 0.06, P = 0.61), but differences over time in these two indicators were correlated (q =0.56, P = 0.02). Conclusions: Large variations in the distribution of Apgar scores likely due to national scoring practices make the Apgar score an unsuitable indicator for benchmarking newborn health across countries. However, country-level trends over time in the Apgar score may reflect real changes and merit further investigation.John Wiley & Sons Ltd20172017-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10216/111520eng0269-5022 10.1111/ppe.12368Siddiqui, ACuttini, MWood, RVelebil, PDelnord, MZile, IBarros, HGissler, MHindori-Mohangoo, ADBlondel, BZeitlin, JEuro-Peristat Scientific Committee info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-29T14:37:48Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/111520Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T00:05:29.704740Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Can the Apgar Score be Used for International Comparisons of Newborn Health? |
title |
Can the Apgar Score be Used for International Comparisons of Newborn Health? |
spellingShingle |
Can the Apgar Score be Used for International Comparisons of Newborn Health? Siddiqui, A Apgar Score Neonatal morbidity Neonatal mortality Health indicators |
title_short |
Can the Apgar Score be Used for International Comparisons of Newborn Health? |
title_full |
Can the Apgar Score be Used for International Comparisons of Newborn Health? |
title_fullStr |
Can the Apgar Score be Used for International Comparisons of Newborn Health? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Can the Apgar Score be Used for International Comparisons of Newborn Health? |
title_sort |
Can the Apgar Score be Used for International Comparisons of Newborn Health? |
author |
Siddiqui, A |
author_facet |
Siddiqui, A Cuttini, M Wood, R Velebil, P Delnord, M Zile, I Barros, H Gissler, M Hindori-Mohangoo, AD Blondel, B Zeitlin, J Euro-Peristat Scientific Committee |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cuttini, M Wood, R Velebil, P Delnord, M Zile, I Barros, H Gissler, M Hindori-Mohangoo, AD Blondel, B Zeitlin, J Euro-Peristat Scientific Committee |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Siddiqui, A Cuttini, M Wood, R Velebil, P Delnord, M Zile, I Barros, H Gissler, M Hindori-Mohangoo, AD Blondel, B Zeitlin, J Euro-Peristat Scientific Committee |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Apgar Score Neonatal morbidity Neonatal mortality Health indicators |
topic |
Apgar Score Neonatal morbidity Neonatal mortality Health indicators |
description |
Background: The Apgar score has been shown to be predictive of neonatal mortality in clinical and population studies, but has not been used for international comparisons. We examined population-level distributions in Apgar scores and associations with neonatal mortality in Europe. Methods: Aggregate data on the 5 minute Apgar score for live births and neonatal mortality rates from countries participating in the Euro-Peristat project in 2004 and 2010 were analysed. Country level associations between the Apgar score and neonatal mortality were assessed using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Results: Twenty-three countries or regions provided data on Apgar at 5 minutes, covering 2 183 472 live births. Scores <7 ranged from 0.3% to 2.4% across countries in 2004 and 2010 and were correlated over time (q = 0.88, P < 0.01). There were large differences in healthy baby scores: scores of 10 ranged from 8.8% to 92.7% whereas scores of 9 or 10 ranged from 72.9% to 96.8%. Countries more likely to score 10 s, as opposed to 9 s, for healthy babies had lower proportions of Apgar <7 (q = 0.43, P = 0.04). Neonatal mortality rates were weakly correlated with Apgar score <7 (q = 0.06, P = 0.61), but differences over time in these two indicators were correlated (q =0.56, P = 0.02). Conclusions: Large variations in the distribution of Apgar scores likely due to national scoring practices make the Apgar score an unsuitable indicator for benchmarking newborn health across countries. However, country-level trends over time in the Apgar score may reflect real changes and merit further investigation. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10216/111520 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10216/111520 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0269-5022 10.1111/ppe.12368 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
John Wiley & Sons Ltd |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
John Wiley & Sons Ltd |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799135978748641280 |