Can the Apgar Score be Used for International Comparisons of Newborn Health?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Siddiqui, A
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Cuttini, M, Wood, R, Velebil, P, Delnord, M, Zile, I, Barros, H, Gissler, M, Hindori-Mohangoo, AD, Blondel, B, Zeitlin, J, Euro-Peristat Scientific Committee 
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10216/111520
Resumo: Background: The Apgar score has been shown to be predictive of neonatal mortality in clinical and population studies, but has not been used for international comparisons. We examined population-level distributions in Apgar scores and associations with neonatal mortality in Europe. Methods: Aggregate data on the 5 minute Apgar score for live births and neonatal mortality rates from countries participating in the Euro-Peristat project in 2004 and 2010 were analysed. Country level associations between the Apgar score and neonatal mortality were assessed using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Results: Twenty-three countries or regions provided data on Apgar at 5 minutes, covering 2 183 472 live births. Scores <7 ranged from 0.3% to 2.4% across countries in 2004 and 2010 and were correlated over time (q = 0.88, P < 0.01). There were large differences in healthy baby scores: scores of 10 ranged from 8.8% to 92.7% whereas scores of 9 or 10 ranged from 72.9% to 96.8%. Countries more likely to score 10 s, as opposed to 9 s, for healthy babies had lower proportions of Apgar <7 (q = 0.43, P = 0.04). Neonatal mortality rates were weakly correlated with Apgar score <7 (q = 0.06, P = 0.61), but differences over time in these two indicators were correlated (q =0.56, P = 0.02). Conclusions: Large variations in the distribution of Apgar scores likely due to national scoring practices make the Apgar score an unsuitable indicator for benchmarking newborn health across countries. However, country-level trends over time in the Apgar score may reflect real changes and merit further investigation.
id RCAP_2840bb57f9c677e00447569b264f2cc2
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/111520
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Can the Apgar Score be Used for International Comparisons of Newborn Health?Apgar ScoreNeonatal morbidityNeonatal mortalityHealth indicatorsBackground: The Apgar score has been shown to be predictive of neonatal mortality in clinical and population studies, but has not been used for international comparisons. We examined population-level distributions in Apgar scores and associations with neonatal mortality in Europe. Methods: Aggregate data on the 5 minute Apgar score for live births and neonatal mortality rates from countries participating in the Euro-Peristat project in 2004 and 2010 were analysed. Country level associations between the Apgar score and neonatal mortality were assessed using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Results: Twenty-three countries or regions provided data on Apgar at 5 minutes, covering 2 183 472 live births. Scores <7 ranged from 0.3% to 2.4% across countries in 2004 and 2010 and were correlated over time (q = 0.88, P < 0.01). There were large differences in healthy baby scores: scores of 10 ranged from 8.8% to 92.7% whereas scores of 9 or 10 ranged from 72.9% to 96.8%. Countries more likely to score 10 s, as opposed to 9 s, for healthy babies had lower proportions of Apgar <7 (q = 0.43, P = 0.04). Neonatal mortality rates were weakly correlated with Apgar score <7 (q = 0.06, P = 0.61), but differences over time in these two indicators were correlated (q =0.56, P = 0.02). Conclusions: Large variations in the distribution of Apgar scores likely due to national scoring practices make the Apgar score an unsuitable indicator for benchmarking newborn health across countries. However, country-level trends over time in the Apgar score may reflect real changes and merit further investigation.John Wiley & Sons Ltd20172017-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10216/111520eng0269-5022 10.1111/ppe.12368Siddiqui, ACuttini, MWood, RVelebil, PDelnord, MZile, IBarros, HGissler, MHindori-Mohangoo, ADBlondel, BZeitlin, JEuro-Peristat Scientific Committee info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-29T14:37:48Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/111520Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T00:05:29.704740Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Can the Apgar Score be Used for International Comparisons of Newborn Health?
title Can the Apgar Score be Used for International Comparisons of Newborn Health?
spellingShingle Can the Apgar Score be Used for International Comparisons of Newborn Health?
Siddiqui, A
Apgar Score
Neonatal morbidity
Neonatal mortality
Health indicators
title_short Can the Apgar Score be Used for International Comparisons of Newborn Health?
title_full Can the Apgar Score be Used for International Comparisons of Newborn Health?
title_fullStr Can the Apgar Score be Used for International Comparisons of Newborn Health?
title_full_unstemmed Can the Apgar Score be Used for International Comparisons of Newborn Health?
title_sort Can the Apgar Score be Used for International Comparisons of Newborn Health?
author Siddiqui, A
author_facet Siddiqui, A
Cuttini, M
Wood, R
Velebil, P
Delnord, M
Zile, I
Barros, H
Gissler, M
Hindori-Mohangoo, AD
Blondel, B
Zeitlin, J
Euro-Peristat Scientific Committee 
author_role author
author2 Cuttini, M
Wood, R
Velebil, P
Delnord, M
Zile, I
Barros, H
Gissler, M
Hindori-Mohangoo, AD
Blondel, B
Zeitlin, J
Euro-Peristat Scientific Committee 
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Siddiqui, A
Cuttini, M
Wood, R
Velebil, P
Delnord, M
Zile, I
Barros, H
Gissler, M
Hindori-Mohangoo, AD
Blondel, B
Zeitlin, J
Euro-Peristat Scientific Committee 
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Apgar Score
Neonatal morbidity
Neonatal mortality
Health indicators
topic Apgar Score
Neonatal morbidity
Neonatal mortality
Health indicators
description Background: The Apgar score has been shown to be predictive of neonatal mortality in clinical and population studies, but has not been used for international comparisons. We examined population-level distributions in Apgar scores and associations with neonatal mortality in Europe. Methods: Aggregate data on the 5 minute Apgar score for live births and neonatal mortality rates from countries participating in the Euro-Peristat project in 2004 and 2010 were analysed. Country level associations between the Apgar score and neonatal mortality were assessed using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Results: Twenty-three countries or regions provided data on Apgar at 5 minutes, covering 2 183 472 live births. Scores <7 ranged from 0.3% to 2.4% across countries in 2004 and 2010 and were correlated over time (q = 0.88, P < 0.01). There were large differences in healthy baby scores: scores of 10 ranged from 8.8% to 92.7% whereas scores of 9 or 10 ranged from 72.9% to 96.8%. Countries more likely to score 10 s, as opposed to 9 s, for healthy babies had lower proportions of Apgar <7 (q = 0.43, P = 0.04). Neonatal mortality rates were weakly correlated with Apgar score <7 (q = 0.06, P = 0.61), but differences over time in these two indicators were correlated (q =0.56, P = 0.02). Conclusions: Large variations in the distribution of Apgar scores likely due to national scoring practices make the Apgar score an unsuitable indicator for benchmarking newborn health across countries. However, country-level trends over time in the Apgar score may reflect real changes and merit further investigation.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10216/111520
url http://hdl.handle.net/10216/111520
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0269-5022 
10.1111/ppe.12368
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv John Wiley & Sons Ltd
publisher.none.fl_str_mv John Wiley & Sons Ltd
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799135978748641280