Infeções urinárias na gravidez

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gomes,Inês
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Metello,José, Freitas,Bruno, Diogo,José
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-58302017000400004
Resumo: Overview and Aims: Urinary tract infections (UTI) are frequent in pregnancy and are associated with increased preterm delivery and low birth weight. Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ABU) is the most common clinical entity and in the absence of treatment it can progress to pyelonephritis in 25% to 30% of the cases. The culture of a urine specimen is the gold standard for the diagnosis of UTI, being Escherichia coli the most common agent. The aim of this study is 1) to identify which are the main microbial agents of the urine cultures in a pregnant population, 2) to observe the agents' antibiotic resistance and sensitivity, 3) to investigate which are the best antimicrobials for the treatment of an UTI in pregnant women, and 4) to compare with a similar study conducted at the same hospital between 2005 and 2006 in order to analyze the evolution of the antimicrobial resistances pattern. Study design: Retrospective observational study. Population: 305 cases with positive urine cultures obtained in the obstetrics outpatient clinic of a tertiary care hospital, between January 2014 and December 2015. Results: E. coli was isolated in 48,9% of cases. Streptococcus agalactiae was identified in 18,4%, Klebsiella pneumoniae in 10,1% and Proteus mirabilis in 8,5%. The global antimicrobial resistance profile was: ampicillin 50%, nitrofurantoin 24%, cotrimoxazole 17%, cefalotin 11%, amoxicilin+clavulanate and gentamycin both 6%, cefuroxime 3%, ceftazidime ceftriaxone and piperacilin-tazobactam 0%. Conclusions: In our population, the most frequent agent was E. coli. Cefuroxime is a good choice as a first-line agent for empiric treatment. Ampicillin and cotrimoxazole presented both high global and E. coli specific resistance rates. Comparatively to 2005 and 2006, the resistances have increased for nitrofurantoin and decreased for amoxicilin+clavulanate
id RCAP_288bd52eb601d149a121d79e85023b37
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1646-58302017000400004
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Infeções urinárias na gravidezUrinary tract infectionsPregnancyMicrobial sensitivity testsDrug resistanceMicrobialOverview and Aims: Urinary tract infections (UTI) are frequent in pregnancy and are associated with increased preterm delivery and low birth weight. Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ABU) is the most common clinical entity and in the absence of treatment it can progress to pyelonephritis in 25% to 30% of the cases. The culture of a urine specimen is the gold standard for the diagnosis of UTI, being Escherichia coli the most common agent. The aim of this study is 1) to identify which are the main microbial agents of the urine cultures in a pregnant population, 2) to observe the agents' antibiotic resistance and sensitivity, 3) to investigate which are the best antimicrobials for the treatment of an UTI in pregnant women, and 4) to compare with a similar study conducted at the same hospital between 2005 and 2006 in order to analyze the evolution of the antimicrobial resistances pattern. Study design: Retrospective observational study. Population: 305 cases with positive urine cultures obtained in the obstetrics outpatient clinic of a tertiary care hospital, between January 2014 and December 2015. Results: E. coli was isolated in 48,9% of cases. Streptococcus agalactiae was identified in 18,4%, Klebsiella pneumoniae in 10,1% and Proteus mirabilis in 8,5%. The global antimicrobial resistance profile was: ampicillin 50%, nitrofurantoin 24%, cotrimoxazole 17%, cefalotin 11%, amoxicilin+clavulanate and gentamycin both 6%, cefuroxime 3%, ceftazidime ceftriaxone and piperacilin-tazobactam 0%. Conclusions: In our population, the most frequent agent was E. coli. Cefuroxime is a good choice as a first-line agent for empiric treatment. Ampicillin and cotrimoxazole presented both high global and E. coli specific resistance rates. Comparatively to 2005 and 2006, the resistances have increased for nitrofurantoin and decreased for amoxicilin+clavulanateEuromédice, Edições Médicas Lda.2017-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-58302017000400004Acta Obstétrica e Ginecológica Portuguesa v.11 n.4 2017reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-58302017000400004Gomes,InêsMetello,JoséFreitas,BrunoDiogo,Joséinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:21:39Zoai:scielo:S1646-58302017000400004Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:28:36.888456Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Infeções urinárias na gravidez
title Infeções urinárias na gravidez
spellingShingle Infeções urinárias na gravidez
Gomes,Inês
Urinary tract infections
Pregnancy
Microbial sensitivity tests
Drug resistance
Microbial
title_short Infeções urinárias na gravidez
title_full Infeções urinárias na gravidez
title_fullStr Infeções urinárias na gravidez
title_full_unstemmed Infeções urinárias na gravidez
title_sort Infeções urinárias na gravidez
author Gomes,Inês
author_facet Gomes,Inês
Metello,José
Freitas,Bruno
Diogo,José
author_role author
author2 Metello,José
Freitas,Bruno
Diogo,José
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gomes,Inês
Metello,José
Freitas,Bruno
Diogo,José
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Urinary tract infections
Pregnancy
Microbial sensitivity tests
Drug resistance
Microbial
topic Urinary tract infections
Pregnancy
Microbial sensitivity tests
Drug resistance
Microbial
description Overview and Aims: Urinary tract infections (UTI) are frequent in pregnancy and are associated with increased preterm delivery and low birth weight. Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ABU) is the most common clinical entity and in the absence of treatment it can progress to pyelonephritis in 25% to 30% of the cases. The culture of a urine specimen is the gold standard for the diagnosis of UTI, being Escherichia coli the most common agent. The aim of this study is 1) to identify which are the main microbial agents of the urine cultures in a pregnant population, 2) to observe the agents' antibiotic resistance and sensitivity, 3) to investigate which are the best antimicrobials for the treatment of an UTI in pregnant women, and 4) to compare with a similar study conducted at the same hospital between 2005 and 2006 in order to analyze the evolution of the antimicrobial resistances pattern. Study design: Retrospective observational study. Population: 305 cases with positive urine cultures obtained in the obstetrics outpatient clinic of a tertiary care hospital, between January 2014 and December 2015. Results: E. coli was isolated in 48,9% of cases. Streptococcus agalactiae was identified in 18,4%, Klebsiella pneumoniae in 10,1% and Proteus mirabilis in 8,5%. The global antimicrobial resistance profile was: ampicillin 50%, nitrofurantoin 24%, cotrimoxazole 17%, cefalotin 11%, amoxicilin+clavulanate and gentamycin both 6%, cefuroxime 3%, ceftazidime ceftriaxone and piperacilin-tazobactam 0%. Conclusions: In our population, the most frequent agent was E. coli. Cefuroxime is a good choice as a first-line agent for empiric treatment. Ampicillin and cotrimoxazole presented both high global and E. coli specific resistance rates. Comparatively to 2005 and 2006, the resistances have increased for nitrofurantoin and decreased for amoxicilin+clavulanate
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-10-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-58302017000400004
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-58302017000400004
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-58302017000400004
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Euromédice, Edições Médicas Lda.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Euromédice, Edições Médicas Lda.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Obstétrica e Ginecológica Portuguesa v.11 n.4 2017
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137355764858880