Reliability and factor structure of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) among Portuguese adults

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pereira, Anabela
Publication Date: 2018
Other Authors: Monteiro, Sara, Oliveira, Carla Andreia, Vagos, Paula, Bártolo, Ana, Jardim, Jacinto
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/11328/2144
Summary: The 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) has been presented as a valid measure to assess psychological distress levels in population surveys but its dimensional structure was not consensual. Our main objective was to provide a Portuguese version of the K10 exploring the reliability and factor structure of this measure. This cross-sectional study included 694 adults collecteda web-based survey and in training entities. Results showed that 37.9% of the individuals reported significant distress symptoms. A good internal consistency of the K10 scale (α=.91) and strong inter-item correlation (ranges350 to .659) were found in our study but the original one-dimensional structure was not confirmed. A two-factor model considering anxiety and depression as two latent, independent but correlated factors shows a good fit with the data even across two data collection methods. The K10 tool was sensitive to sociodemographic variables. Participants aged 40 or over and belonging to the general working class presented higher distress levels. Our data indicates the Portuguese version of K10 as a reliable tool with a factor structure to assess psychological distress.
id RCAP_28d694c291d08b73312c13180340be17
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uportu.pt:11328/2144
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str
spelling Reliability and factor structure of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) among Portuguese adultsK10Factor structureReliabilityAdultsPortuguesesEstrutura fatorialConfiabilidadeAdultosPortuguesesThe 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) has been presented as a valid measure to assess psychological distress levels in population surveys but its dimensional structure was not consensual. Our main objective was to provide a Portuguese version of the K10 exploring the reliability and factor structure of this measure. This cross-sectional study included 694 adults collecteda web-based survey and in training entities. Results showed that 37.9% of the individuals reported significant distress symptoms. A good internal consistency of the K10 scale (α=.91) and strong inter-item correlation (ranges350 to .659) were found in our study but the original one-dimensional structure was not confirmed. A two-factor model considering anxiety and depression as two latent, independent but correlated factors shows a good fit with the data even across two data collection methods. The K10 tool was sensitive to sociodemographic variables. Participants aged 40 or over and belonging to the general working class presented higher distress levels. Our data indicates the Portuguese version of K10 as a reliable tool with a factor structure to assess psychological distress.A Escala de Distress Psicológico de Kessler de 10 itens (K10), é apresentada como uma medida válida para avaliar o distress psicológico em pesquisas populacionais, mas a sua estrutura dimensional não é consensual. O objetivo do presente estudo foi providenciar uma versão Portuguesa do K10 explorando a confiabilidade e a estrutura fatorial desta medida. Este estudo transversal incluiu 694 adultos, recrutados através de uma pesquisa via web e em entidades formadoras. Os resultados mostraram que 37,9% dos indivíduos reportaram sintomas de distress significativos. A escala K10 apresentou uma boa consistência interna (?= 0,91) e fortes correlações inter-item (entre 0,35a 0,66). No entanto, a estrutura unidimensional original não foi confirmada. Um modelo dois fatores considerando a ansiedade e a depressão como dois fatores latentes independentes, mas correlacionados mostrou um bom ajuste mesmo entre os dois métodos de recolha. A ferramenta K10 foi ainda sensível para variáveis sociodemográficas. Participantes com 40 anos ou mais e que pertenciam à classe trabalhadora geral apresentaram maiores níveis de distress psicológico. Os dados obtidos indicaram que a versão Portuguesa do K10 é uma ferramenta confiável com uma estrutura fatorial para avaliar sintomas não específicos de distress.2018-04-18T15:50:58Z2019-01-01T00:00:00Z2019info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11328/2144engPereira, AnabelaMonteiro, SaraOliveira, Carla AndreiaVagos, PaulaBártolo, AnaJardim, Jacintoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-06-15T02:10:27ZPortal AgregadorONG
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reliability and factor structure of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) among Portuguese adults
title Reliability and factor structure of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) among Portuguese adults
spellingShingle Reliability and factor structure of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) among Portuguese adults
Pereira, Anabela
K10
Factor structure
Reliability
Adults
Portugueses
Estrutura fatorial
Confiabilidade
Adultos
Portugueses
title_short Reliability and factor structure of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) among Portuguese adults
title_full Reliability and factor structure of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) among Portuguese adults
title_fullStr Reliability and factor structure of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) among Portuguese adults
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and factor structure of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) among Portuguese adults
title_sort Reliability and factor structure of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) among Portuguese adults
author Pereira, Anabela
author_facet Pereira, Anabela
Monteiro, Sara
Oliveira, Carla Andreia
Vagos, Paula
Bártolo, Ana
Jardim, Jacinto
author_role author
author2 Monteiro, Sara
Oliveira, Carla Andreia
Vagos, Paula
Bártolo, Ana
Jardim, Jacinto
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira, Anabela
Monteiro, Sara
Oliveira, Carla Andreia
Vagos, Paula
Bártolo, Ana
Jardim, Jacinto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv K10
Factor structure
Reliability
Adults
Portugueses
Estrutura fatorial
Confiabilidade
Adultos
Portugueses
topic K10
Factor structure
Reliability
Adults
Portugueses
Estrutura fatorial
Confiabilidade
Adultos
Portugueses
description The 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) has been presented as a valid measure to assess psychological distress levels in population surveys but its dimensional structure was not consensual. Our main objective was to provide a Portuguese version of the K10 exploring the reliability and factor structure of this measure. This cross-sectional study included 694 adults collecteda web-based survey and in training entities. Results showed that 37.9% of the individuals reported significant distress symptoms. A good internal consistency of the K10 scale (α=.91) and strong inter-item correlation (ranges350 to .659) were found in our study but the original one-dimensional structure was not confirmed. A two-factor model considering anxiety and depression as two latent, independent but correlated factors shows a good fit with the data even across two data collection methods. The K10 tool was sensitive to sociodemographic variables. Participants aged 40 or over and belonging to the general working class presented higher distress levels. Our data indicates the Portuguese version of K10 as a reliable tool with a factor structure to assess psychological distress.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-04-18T15:50:58Z
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
2019
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11328/2144
url http://hdl.handle.net/11328/2144
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1777302552003477504