Revisiting Covered Interest Parity in the European Union: the DCCA Approach
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10174/16629 https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2015.1081260 https://doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2015.1081260 |
Resumo: | This paper analyzes the evidence of financial integration, with covered interest parity (CIP), for a group of countries that have already adopted the euro and another group of countries that kept their currencies. We use detrended crosscorrelation analysis, which allows analyzing the behavior of time series even when they are not stationary. The main results indicate that countries that adopted the euro do not show much evidence in favor of CIP, before joining the Eurozone, which could imply they will not benefit from all common currency advantages. In the group of countries that did not adopt the euro, Denmark, Sweden, the UK and the Czech Republic are the ones presenting better conditions for financial integration with the euro, while Bulgaria has also some evidence of this. Some possible explanations of CIP deviations are agents not considering all countries’ assets as similar and also the underdevelopment of markets and liquidity problems (more pronounced due to periods of turmoil). |
id |
RCAP_2a4ec842e5c42cec851b0b4afd384ced |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/16629 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Revisiting Covered Interest Parity in the European Union: the DCCA Approachfinancial integrationeuroDCCAcommon currencyThis paper analyzes the evidence of financial integration, with covered interest parity (CIP), for a group of countries that have already adopted the euro and another group of countries that kept their currencies. We use detrended crosscorrelation analysis, which allows analyzing the behavior of time series even when they are not stationary. The main results indicate that countries that adopted the euro do not show much evidence in favor of CIP, before joining the Eurozone, which could imply they will not benefit from all common currency advantages. In the group of countries that did not adopt the euro, Denmark, Sweden, the UK and the Czech Republic are the ones presenting better conditions for financial integration with the euro, while Bulgaria has also some evidence of this. Some possible explanations of CIP deviations are agents not considering all countries’ assets as similar and also the underdevelopment of markets and liquidity problems (more pronounced due to periods of turmoil).Routledge2016-01-13T18:07:55Z2016-01-132015-09-22T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/16629https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2015.1081260http://hdl.handle.net/10174/16629https://doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2015.1081260porFerreira, P., A. Dionísio, (2015), "Revisiting covered interest parity in the European Union: the DCCA approach", International Economic Journal, 29(4), 597-615.Departamento de Gestãopjsf@uevora.ptandreia@uevora.pt637Ferreira, PauloDionísio, Andreiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T19:03:31Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/16629Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:08:57.944548Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Revisiting Covered Interest Parity in the European Union: the DCCA Approach |
title |
Revisiting Covered Interest Parity in the European Union: the DCCA Approach |
spellingShingle |
Revisiting Covered Interest Parity in the European Union: the DCCA Approach Ferreira, Paulo financial integration euro DCCA common currency |
title_short |
Revisiting Covered Interest Parity in the European Union: the DCCA Approach |
title_full |
Revisiting Covered Interest Parity in the European Union: the DCCA Approach |
title_fullStr |
Revisiting Covered Interest Parity in the European Union: the DCCA Approach |
title_full_unstemmed |
Revisiting Covered Interest Parity in the European Union: the DCCA Approach |
title_sort |
Revisiting Covered Interest Parity in the European Union: the DCCA Approach |
author |
Ferreira, Paulo |
author_facet |
Ferreira, Paulo Dionísio, Andreia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Dionísio, Andreia |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira, Paulo Dionísio, Andreia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
financial integration euro DCCA common currency |
topic |
financial integration euro DCCA common currency |
description |
This paper analyzes the evidence of financial integration, with covered interest parity (CIP), for a group of countries that have already adopted the euro and another group of countries that kept their currencies. We use detrended crosscorrelation analysis, which allows analyzing the behavior of time series even when they are not stationary. The main results indicate that countries that adopted the euro do not show much evidence in favor of CIP, before joining the Eurozone, which could imply they will not benefit from all common currency advantages. In the group of countries that did not adopt the euro, Denmark, Sweden, the UK and the Czech Republic are the ones presenting better conditions for financial integration with the euro, while Bulgaria has also some evidence of this. Some possible explanations of CIP deviations are agents not considering all countries’ assets as similar and also the underdevelopment of markets and liquidity problems (more pronounced due to periods of turmoil). |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-09-22T00:00:00Z 2016-01-13T18:07:55Z 2016-01-13 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/16629 https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2015.1081260 http://hdl.handle.net/10174/16629 https://doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2015.1081260 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/16629 https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2015.1081260 https://doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2015.1081260 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira, P., A. Dionísio, (2015), "Revisiting covered interest parity in the European Union: the DCCA approach", International Economic Journal, 29(4), 597-615. Departamento de Gestão pjsf@uevora.pt andreia@uevora.pt 637 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Routledge |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Routledge |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136572434546688 |