Comparing the effectiveness of different organic growth strategies for Instagram

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Catarina de Noronha Macedo
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/26946
Resumo: Instagram is becoming one of the top social networks, having recently reached 1 billion monthly active users. Marketers use it not only for advertising, but also for building up a substantial follower base of potential consumers who can provide insights and grant credibility to the brand. As such, digital marketing experts debate on which is the best strategy to grow organically on Instagram, i.e. to attract followers without relying on paid advertisement. This dissertation empirically tests three organic growth strategies through an experiment performed on two Instagram brand pages – one with an emotional appeal to its content, and the other with a rational appeal. The first strategy (Content strategy) is based on posting content regularly, while also using hashtags and geotags. The other two strategies (Engagement and Follow) rely on interacting with target users, either by writing comments or following them. Throughout four weeks, the daily impacts on follower count and average engagement were tracked. The results indicate that the Follow strategy is the most effective at generating follower growth, for both emotional and rational brands. On the other hand, having a strong Content strategy is the best way to foster engagement. A key finding is that the growth and engagement generated by the strategies are significantly higher for the emotional brand. This implies that marketers must present their brand’s Instagram content in a more sentimental way, adapting to the visual-oriented culture of this social network, otherwise the results of their organic marketing efforts will not reach their true potential.
id RCAP_2a6a5e70198c85967fc0d86d510121d5
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/26946
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Comparing the effectiveness of different organic growth strategies for InstagramSocial mediaInstagramOrganic growthFollowersEngagementDigital interactionsFirm-generated contentRedes sociaisCrescimento orgânicoDigitalSeguidoresInteraçõesConteúdosDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e GestãoInstagram is becoming one of the top social networks, having recently reached 1 billion monthly active users. Marketers use it not only for advertising, but also for building up a substantial follower base of potential consumers who can provide insights and grant credibility to the brand. As such, digital marketing experts debate on which is the best strategy to grow organically on Instagram, i.e. to attract followers without relying on paid advertisement. This dissertation empirically tests three organic growth strategies through an experiment performed on two Instagram brand pages – one with an emotional appeal to its content, and the other with a rational appeal. The first strategy (Content strategy) is based on posting content regularly, while also using hashtags and geotags. The other two strategies (Engagement and Follow) rely on interacting with target users, either by writing comments or following them. Throughout four weeks, the daily impacts on follower count and average engagement were tracked. The results indicate that the Follow strategy is the most effective at generating follower growth, for both emotional and rational brands. On the other hand, having a strong Content strategy is the best way to foster engagement. A key finding is that the growth and engagement generated by the strategies are significantly higher for the emotional brand. This implies that marketers must present their brand’s Instagram content in a more sentimental way, adapting to the visual-oriented culture of this social network, otherwise the results of their organic marketing efforts will not reach their true potential.O Instagram está a tornar-se numa das principais redes sociais, tendo atingido recentemente mil milhões de usuários ativos mensais. Os profissionais de marketing utilizam-na para fins publicitários, mas também para construir uma rede de seguidores, que concede credibilidade à marca e pode gerar insights. Como tal, vários especialistas debatem qual será a melhor estratégia para crescer organicamente nesta rede, ou seja, atrair seguidores sem depender de investimentos em publicidade. Esta dissertação testa empiricamente três estratégias de crescimento orgânico através de uma experiência realizada em duas páginas de Instagram - uma com apelo emocional e a outra com apelo racional. A primeira estratégia (“Content strategy”) é baseada na publicação regular de conteúdos, usando hashtags e geotags. As outras estratégias (“Engagement” e “Follow”) focam-se em interações com usuários-alvo, através de comentários ou follows. Ao longo de quatro semanas, os impactos diários na contagem de seguidores e no nível médio de engagement foram monitorizados. Os resultados indicam que a estratégia Follow é a mais eficaz a gerar crescimento de seguidores, tanto para marcas de apelo emocional como racional. Por outro lado, uma forte estratégia de conteúdo é a melhor forma de promover engagement. A principal descoberta é que os acréscimos de followers e engagement gerados pelas estratégias são significativamente mais altos para a marca emocional do que para a racional. Isso implica que os conteúdos das marcas devem ser apresentados de uma forma mais sentimental, adaptando-se à cultura visual do Instagram, para que os esforços de marketing orgânico sejam mais produtivos.Rosa, PedroVeritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica PortuguesaPereira, Catarina de Noronha Macedo2019-02-21T11:02:51Z2019-01-2920192019-01-29T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/26946TID:202171027enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-12T17:32:27Zoai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/26946Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:21:32.720258Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparing the effectiveness of different organic growth strategies for Instagram
title Comparing the effectiveness of different organic growth strategies for Instagram
spellingShingle Comparing the effectiveness of different organic growth strategies for Instagram
Pereira, Catarina de Noronha Macedo
Social media
Instagram
Organic growth
Followers
Engagement
Digital interactions
Firm-generated content
Redes sociais
Crescimento orgânico
Digital
Seguidores
Interações
Conteúdos
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
title_short Comparing the effectiveness of different organic growth strategies for Instagram
title_full Comparing the effectiveness of different organic growth strategies for Instagram
title_fullStr Comparing the effectiveness of different organic growth strategies for Instagram
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the effectiveness of different organic growth strategies for Instagram
title_sort Comparing the effectiveness of different organic growth strategies for Instagram
author Pereira, Catarina de Noronha Macedo
author_facet Pereira, Catarina de Noronha Macedo
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Rosa, Pedro
Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica Portuguesa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira, Catarina de Noronha Macedo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Social media
Instagram
Organic growth
Followers
Engagement
Digital interactions
Firm-generated content
Redes sociais
Crescimento orgânico
Digital
Seguidores
Interações
Conteúdos
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
topic Social media
Instagram
Organic growth
Followers
Engagement
Digital interactions
Firm-generated content
Redes sociais
Crescimento orgânico
Digital
Seguidores
Interações
Conteúdos
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
description Instagram is becoming one of the top social networks, having recently reached 1 billion monthly active users. Marketers use it not only for advertising, but also for building up a substantial follower base of potential consumers who can provide insights and grant credibility to the brand. As such, digital marketing experts debate on which is the best strategy to grow organically on Instagram, i.e. to attract followers without relying on paid advertisement. This dissertation empirically tests three organic growth strategies through an experiment performed on two Instagram brand pages – one with an emotional appeal to its content, and the other with a rational appeal. The first strategy (Content strategy) is based on posting content regularly, while also using hashtags and geotags. The other two strategies (Engagement and Follow) rely on interacting with target users, either by writing comments or following them. Throughout four weeks, the daily impacts on follower count and average engagement were tracked. The results indicate that the Follow strategy is the most effective at generating follower growth, for both emotional and rational brands. On the other hand, having a strong Content strategy is the best way to foster engagement. A key finding is that the growth and engagement generated by the strategies are significantly higher for the emotional brand. This implies that marketers must present their brand’s Instagram content in a more sentimental way, adapting to the visual-oriented culture of this social network, otherwise the results of their organic marketing efforts will not reach their true potential.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-02-21T11:02:51Z
2019-01-29
2019
2019-01-29T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/26946
TID:202171027
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/26946
identifier_str_mv TID:202171027
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131916549488640