Public perception of "scarless" surgery : a critical analysis of the literature
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/1822/33491 |
Resumo: | Evidence relating to the perception and view of patients and physicians on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) was scrutinized. A comprehensive literature search was performed through PubMed. A total of 18 studies were included in the analysis. Patients demonstrated interest in scarless surgery, with a preference for LESS over NOTES. Safety and efficacy remain the key factors in the decision-making process of patients. With more information about the safety and reproducibility of LESS and NOTES, and with improved educational efforts, patients and physicians alike may feel more comfortable in widespread application of scarless surgery. |
id |
RCAP_2b793f06758c57585918e071ac168af0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/33491 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Public perception of "scarless" surgery : a critical analysis of the literatureEvidence relating to the perception and view of patients and physicians on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) was scrutinized. A comprehensive literature search was performed through PubMed. A total of 18 studies were included in the analysis. Patients demonstrated interest in scarless surgery, with a preference for LESS over NOTES. Safety and efficacy remain the key factors in the decision-making process of patients. With more information about the safety and reproducibility of LESS and NOTES, and with improved educational efforts, patients and physicians alike may feel more comfortable in widespread application of scarless surgery.(undefined)ElsevierUniversidade do MinhoAutorino, RiccardoWhite, Wesley M.Gettman, MatthewKhalifeh, AliDe Sio, MarcoLima, Estêvão Augusto Rodrigues deKaouk, Jihad H.20122012-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/33491eng0090-429510.1016/j.urology.2012.04.00222658620http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.04.002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:21:56Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/33491Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:15:20.069552Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Public perception of "scarless" surgery : a critical analysis of the literature |
title |
Public perception of "scarless" surgery : a critical analysis of the literature |
spellingShingle |
Public perception of "scarless" surgery : a critical analysis of the literature Autorino, Riccardo |
title_short |
Public perception of "scarless" surgery : a critical analysis of the literature |
title_full |
Public perception of "scarless" surgery : a critical analysis of the literature |
title_fullStr |
Public perception of "scarless" surgery : a critical analysis of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed |
Public perception of "scarless" surgery : a critical analysis of the literature |
title_sort |
Public perception of "scarless" surgery : a critical analysis of the literature |
author |
Autorino, Riccardo |
author_facet |
Autorino, Riccardo White, Wesley M. Gettman, Matthew Khalifeh, Ali De Sio, Marco Lima, Estêvão Augusto Rodrigues de Kaouk, Jihad H. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
White, Wesley M. Gettman, Matthew Khalifeh, Ali De Sio, Marco Lima, Estêvão Augusto Rodrigues de Kaouk, Jihad H. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Minho |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Autorino, Riccardo White, Wesley M. Gettman, Matthew Khalifeh, Ali De Sio, Marco Lima, Estêvão Augusto Rodrigues de Kaouk, Jihad H. |
description |
Evidence relating to the perception and view of patients and physicians on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) was scrutinized. A comprehensive literature search was performed through PubMed. A total of 18 studies were included in the analysis. Patients demonstrated interest in scarless surgery, with a preference for LESS over NOTES. Safety and efficacy remain the key factors in the decision-making process of patients. With more information about the safety and reproducibility of LESS and NOTES, and with improved educational efforts, patients and physicians alike may feel more comfortable in widespread application of scarless surgery. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012 2012-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/1822/33491 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1822/33491 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0090-4295 10.1016/j.urology.2012.04.002 22658620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.04.002 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799132599234330624 |