Controlled-release and stabilized fertilizers are equivalent options to split application of ammonium nitrate in a double maize-oats cropping system

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Arrobas, Margarida
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Chiocheta Junior, José Carlos, Damo, Letícia, Júlio, Ana Carolina, Hendges, Igor Pereira, Wagner, Américo, Godoy, Wilson Itamar, Cassol, Luís César, Rodrigues, M.A.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10198/26981
Resumo: The application of fertilizers as a topdressing in maize raises serious concerns because too much fertilizer is retained in the upper leaves, causing burning to the tissues. In this study, the use of a controlled-release and a stabilized fertilizer (with 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate) was compared with the application of a conventional fertilizer split into two equivalent applications in a forage maize-oats cropping system. In maize, 100 and 200 kg N ha−1 of different fertilizers were used in addition to an unfertilized control. The oat crop was not fertilized, since it served only as a winter catch crop. Maize dry matter (DM) yield increased significantly with N rate only in 2019, being the second growing season, with the control showing the lowest average value (7.1 t ha−1). The most fertilized treatments (200 kg N ha−1) gave the highest DM yields, ranging between 14.2 and 16.7 t ha−1, but with no significant differences between them. Oats had a relevant role as a catch crop recovering residual N that could have potentially been lost from the soil. Stalk nitrate concentration proved to be very sensitive to N fertilization (varying from 150.4 to 1945.6 mg kg−1 in 2018 and 494.9 to 1574.9 mg kg−1 in 2019), showing great potential as a tool of N management. These three fertilization strategies seem to be valid options that farmers can consider, after incorporating technical-economic information related to equipment suitability and the price of fertilizers.
id RCAP_2b79a538558a83fb3b839f4d4651f47e
oai_identifier_str oai:bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt:10198/26981
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Controlled-release and stabilized fertilizers are equivalent options to split application of ammonium nitrate in a double maize-oats cropping systemZea maysAvena sativaSlow-release fertilizersDry matter yieldStalk nitrate testNitrogen use efficiencyThe application of fertilizers as a topdressing in maize raises serious concerns because too much fertilizer is retained in the upper leaves, causing burning to the tissues. In this study, the use of a controlled-release and a stabilized fertilizer (with 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate) was compared with the application of a conventional fertilizer split into two equivalent applications in a forage maize-oats cropping system. In maize, 100 and 200 kg N ha−1 of different fertilizers were used in addition to an unfertilized control. The oat crop was not fertilized, since it served only as a winter catch crop. Maize dry matter (DM) yield increased significantly with N rate only in 2019, being the second growing season, with the control showing the lowest average value (7.1 t ha−1). The most fertilized treatments (200 kg N ha−1) gave the highest DM yields, ranging between 14.2 and 16.7 t ha−1, but with no significant differences between them. Oats had a relevant role as a catch crop recovering residual N that could have potentially been lost from the soil. Stalk nitrate concentration proved to be very sensitive to N fertilization (varying from 150.4 to 1945.6 mg kg−1 in 2018 and 494.9 to 1574.9 mg kg−1 in 2019), showing great potential as a tool of N management. These three fertilization strategies seem to be valid options that farmers can consider, after incorporating technical-economic information related to equipment suitability and the price of fertilizers.The authors are grateful to the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT, Portugal) and European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) under Programme PT2020 for financial support to CIMO (UIDB/00690/2020).Taylor & FrancisBiblioteca Digital do IPBArrobas, MargaridaChiocheta Junior, José CarlosDamo, LetíciaJúlio, Ana CarolinaHendges, Igor PereiraWagner, AméricoGodoy, Wilson ItamarCassol, Luís CésarRodrigues, M.A.2023-02-16T10:40:13Z20232023-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10198/26981engArrobas, Margarida; Chiochetta, José Carlos; Damo, Letícia; Júlio, Ana Carolina; Hendges, Igor Pereira; Wagner, Américo; Godoy, Wilson Itamar; Cassol, Luís César; Rodrigues, M.A (2023). Controlled-release and stabilized fertilizers are equivalent options to split application of ammonium nitrate in a double maize-oats cropping system. Journal of Plant Nutrition. ISSN 1532-4087. 46:6, p. 996-10081532-408710.1080/01904167.2022.2046061info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-17T01:20:31Zoai:bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt:10198/26981Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T23:15:59.539159Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Controlled-release and stabilized fertilizers are equivalent options to split application of ammonium nitrate in a double maize-oats cropping system
title Controlled-release and stabilized fertilizers are equivalent options to split application of ammonium nitrate in a double maize-oats cropping system
spellingShingle Controlled-release and stabilized fertilizers are equivalent options to split application of ammonium nitrate in a double maize-oats cropping system
Arrobas, Margarida
Zea mays
Avena sativa
Slow-release fertilizers
Dry matter yield
Stalk nitrate test
Nitrogen use efficiency
title_short Controlled-release and stabilized fertilizers are equivalent options to split application of ammonium nitrate in a double maize-oats cropping system
title_full Controlled-release and stabilized fertilizers are equivalent options to split application of ammonium nitrate in a double maize-oats cropping system
title_fullStr Controlled-release and stabilized fertilizers are equivalent options to split application of ammonium nitrate in a double maize-oats cropping system
title_full_unstemmed Controlled-release and stabilized fertilizers are equivalent options to split application of ammonium nitrate in a double maize-oats cropping system
title_sort Controlled-release and stabilized fertilizers are equivalent options to split application of ammonium nitrate in a double maize-oats cropping system
author Arrobas, Margarida
author_facet Arrobas, Margarida
Chiocheta Junior, José Carlos
Damo, Letícia
Júlio, Ana Carolina
Hendges, Igor Pereira
Wagner, Américo
Godoy, Wilson Itamar
Cassol, Luís César
Rodrigues, M.A.
author_role author
author2 Chiocheta Junior, José Carlos
Damo, Letícia
Júlio, Ana Carolina
Hendges, Igor Pereira
Wagner, Américo
Godoy, Wilson Itamar
Cassol, Luís César
Rodrigues, M.A.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital do IPB
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Arrobas, Margarida
Chiocheta Junior, José Carlos
Damo, Letícia
Júlio, Ana Carolina
Hendges, Igor Pereira
Wagner, Américo
Godoy, Wilson Itamar
Cassol, Luís César
Rodrigues, M.A.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Zea mays
Avena sativa
Slow-release fertilizers
Dry matter yield
Stalk nitrate test
Nitrogen use efficiency
topic Zea mays
Avena sativa
Slow-release fertilizers
Dry matter yield
Stalk nitrate test
Nitrogen use efficiency
description The application of fertilizers as a topdressing in maize raises serious concerns because too much fertilizer is retained in the upper leaves, causing burning to the tissues. In this study, the use of a controlled-release and a stabilized fertilizer (with 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate) was compared with the application of a conventional fertilizer split into two equivalent applications in a forage maize-oats cropping system. In maize, 100 and 200 kg N ha−1 of different fertilizers were used in addition to an unfertilized control. The oat crop was not fertilized, since it served only as a winter catch crop. Maize dry matter (DM) yield increased significantly with N rate only in 2019, being the second growing season, with the control showing the lowest average value (7.1 t ha−1). The most fertilized treatments (200 kg N ha−1) gave the highest DM yields, ranging between 14.2 and 16.7 t ha−1, but with no significant differences between them. Oats had a relevant role as a catch crop recovering residual N that could have potentially been lost from the soil. Stalk nitrate concentration proved to be very sensitive to N fertilization (varying from 150.4 to 1945.6 mg kg−1 in 2018 and 494.9 to 1574.9 mg kg−1 in 2019), showing great potential as a tool of N management. These three fertilization strategies seem to be valid options that farmers can consider, after incorporating technical-economic information related to equipment suitability and the price of fertilizers.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-02-16T10:40:13Z
2023
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10198/26981
url http://hdl.handle.net/10198/26981
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Arrobas, Margarida; Chiochetta, José Carlos; Damo, Letícia; Júlio, Ana Carolina; Hendges, Igor Pereira; Wagner, Américo; Godoy, Wilson Itamar; Cassol, Luís César; Rodrigues, M.A (2023). Controlled-release and stabilized fertilizers are equivalent options to split application of ammonium nitrate in a double maize-oats cropping system. Journal of Plant Nutrition. ISSN 1532-4087. 46:6, p. 996-1008
1532-4087
10.1080/01904167.2022.2046061
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799135443919306752