Reforming the International Criminal Court (ICC)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10362/164961 |
Resumo: | The International Criminal Court is a very controversial institution. It is extensively criticised by both its critics and its supporters. This article examines what steps have been taken to reform the Court. It considers issues such as the need for bet-ter communications and messaging by the Court. The paper takes up how and why the Court needs to engage better and in more far-reaching ways with a host of role players that affect the terrain in which the Court operates. It is argued that more reform is needed in how the Court is lead, how it operates, and who the judges and staff are. It is argued that greater diversity is needed at the Court. Also taken up are how the reach of the Court can be increased beyond only prosecutions, how the Court can assist states to prosecute more cases themselves, and how the Court can become more victim centred. A core theme is how state cooperation can be enhanced. A range of suggestions are made so as to enhance the role of the Court in the years to come. |
id |
RCAP_2c35b97b3f901d2c8aaabfcc0a41017c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:run.unl.pt:10362/164961 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Reforming the International Criminal Court (ICC)Progress, Perils and Pitfalls Post the ICC ReviewInternational Criminal CourtUnited Nations Security CouncilCrime of AggressionICC Review ProcessDeterrenceImpunityHuman Rights ViolationsReformsCriticismsInternational Criminal JusticeSDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong InstitutionsThe International Criminal Court is a very controversial institution. It is extensively criticised by both its critics and its supporters. This article examines what steps have been taken to reform the Court. It considers issues such as the need for bet-ter communications and messaging by the Court. The paper takes up how and why the Court needs to engage better and in more far-reaching ways with a host of role players that affect the terrain in which the Court operates. It is argued that more reform is needed in how the Court is lead, how it operates, and who the judges and staff are. It is argued that greater diversity is needed at the Court. Also taken up are how the reach of the Court can be increased beyond only prosecutions, how the Court can assist states to prosecute more cases themselves, and how the Court can become more victim centred. A core theme is how state cooperation can be enhanced. A range of suggestions are made so as to enhance the role of the Court in the years to come.Centro de Investigação e Desenvolvimento sobre Direito e Sociedade (CEDIS)NOVA School of Law|Faculdade de Direito (NSL|FD)RUNSarkin, Jeremy2024-03-14T22:44:37Z20212021-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/164961eng2464-6601PURE: 35298211https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2021-0001info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-05-22T18:19:35Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/164961Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-05-22T18:19:35Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Reforming the International Criminal Court (ICC) Progress, Perils and Pitfalls Post the ICC Review |
title |
Reforming the International Criminal Court (ICC) |
spellingShingle |
Reforming the International Criminal Court (ICC) Sarkin, Jeremy International Criminal Court United Nations Security Council Crime of Aggression ICC Review Process Deterrence Impunity Human Rights Violations Reforms Criticisms International Criminal Justice SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions |
title_short |
Reforming the International Criminal Court (ICC) |
title_full |
Reforming the International Criminal Court (ICC) |
title_fullStr |
Reforming the International Criminal Court (ICC) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reforming the International Criminal Court (ICC) |
title_sort |
Reforming the International Criminal Court (ICC) |
author |
Sarkin, Jeremy |
author_facet |
Sarkin, Jeremy |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Investigação e Desenvolvimento sobre Direito e Sociedade (CEDIS) NOVA School of Law|Faculdade de Direito (NSL|FD) RUN |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sarkin, Jeremy |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
International Criminal Court United Nations Security Council Crime of Aggression ICC Review Process Deterrence Impunity Human Rights Violations Reforms Criticisms International Criminal Justice SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions |
topic |
International Criminal Court United Nations Security Council Crime of Aggression ICC Review Process Deterrence Impunity Human Rights Violations Reforms Criticisms International Criminal Justice SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions |
description |
The International Criminal Court is a very controversial institution. It is extensively criticised by both its critics and its supporters. This article examines what steps have been taken to reform the Court. It considers issues such as the need for bet-ter communications and messaging by the Court. The paper takes up how and why the Court needs to engage better and in more far-reaching ways with a host of role players that affect the terrain in which the Court operates. It is argued that more reform is needed in how the Court is lead, how it operates, and who the judges and staff are. It is argued that greater diversity is needed at the Court. Also taken up are how the reach of the Court can be increased beyond only prosecutions, how the Court can assist states to prosecute more cases themselves, and how the Court can become more victim centred. A core theme is how state cooperation can be enhanced. A range of suggestions are made so as to enhance the role of the Court in the years to come. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z 2024-03-14T22:44:37Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/164961 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/164961 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2464-6601 PURE: 35298211 https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2021-0001 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mluisa.alvim@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1817545995677859840 |