Fórum: Racionamento dos cuidados de saúde: Problemática inerente

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pinho, Micaela
Data de Publicação: 2008
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11328/1931
Resumo: Limited resources in the health sector force a process of choice between alternative health care programs and services and patients or groups of patients who will receive care. In the absence of a price mechanism, the priority-setting process serves to allocate scarce resources among competing uses, and is thus a form of rationing. Traditionally, implicit approaches have dominated the health sector’s decision-making, mostly by physicians. However, in the face of increasing budget constraints and rising patient expectations, more explicit and socially acceptable priority- setting practices are needed. Internationally, the development of explicit prioritization has proven difficult and controversial.
id RCAP_2c4a46958bcc7ee25246252ede570077
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uportu.pt:11328/1931
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str
spelling Fórum: Racionamento dos cuidados de saúde: Problemática inerenteFinancial resources in healthHealth prioritiesHealth systemsHealth planningLimited resources in the health sector force a process of choice between alternative health care programs and services and patients or groups of patients who will receive care. In the absence of a price mechanism, the priority-setting process serves to allocate scarce resources among competing uses, and is thus a form of rationing. Traditionally, implicit approaches have dominated the health sector’s decision-making, mostly by physicians. However, in the face of increasing budget constraints and rising patient expectations, more explicit and socially acceptable priority- setting practices are needed. Internationally, the development of explicit prioritization has proven difficult and controversial.2017-09-28T10:40:45Z2008-01-01T00:00:00Z2008info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11328/1931porPinho, Micaelainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-06-15T02:10:13ZPortal AgregadorONG
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Fórum: Racionamento dos cuidados de saúde: Problemática inerente
title Fórum: Racionamento dos cuidados de saúde: Problemática inerente
spellingShingle Fórum: Racionamento dos cuidados de saúde: Problemática inerente
Pinho, Micaela
Financial resources in health
Health priorities
Health systems
Health planning
title_short Fórum: Racionamento dos cuidados de saúde: Problemática inerente
title_full Fórum: Racionamento dos cuidados de saúde: Problemática inerente
title_fullStr Fórum: Racionamento dos cuidados de saúde: Problemática inerente
title_full_unstemmed Fórum: Racionamento dos cuidados de saúde: Problemática inerente
title_sort Fórum: Racionamento dos cuidados de saúde: Problemática inerente
author Pinho, Micaela
author_facet Pinho, Micaela
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinho, Micaela
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Financial resources in health
Health priorities
Health systems
Health planning
topic Financial resources in health
Health priorities
Health systems
Health planning
description Limited resources in the health sector force a process of choice between alternative health care programs and services and patients or groups of patients who will receive care. In the absence of a price mechanism, the priority-setting process serves to allocate scarce resources among competing uses, and is thus a form of rationing. Traditionally, implicit approaches have dominated the health sector’s decision-making, mostly by physicians. However, in the face of increasing budget constraints and rising patient expectations, more explicit and socially acceptable priority- setting practices are needed. Internationally, the development of explicit prioritization has proven difficult and controversial.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-01-01T00:00:00Z
2008
2017-09-28T10:40:45Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11328/1931
url http://hdl.handle.net/11328/1931
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1777302551342874624