Workshop on accounting for fishers and other stakeholders’ perceptions of the dynamics of fish stocks in ICES advice (WKAFPA)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Angu, Chevonne
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Balestri, Elena, Ballesteros, Marta, Bloecker, Alexandra, Cadrin, Steve, Christensen, Helle, Curtis, David, Dandy, Rufus, Evan, Derek, Farrell, Edward, Gamaza, Maria, Gollock, Matthew, Haase, Stefanie, Hintzen, Niels, Jones, Andrew, Korsbrekke, Knut, Libun- gan, Lisa Anne, Luedemann, Karin, Macdonald, Paul, Mackinson, Steven, Merce, Anna, Murphy, Patrick, Napier, Ian, Pastoors, Martin, Peixoto, Ualerson, Rasmussen, Jens, Reedtz Sparrevohn, Claus, Roux, Marie-Julie, Rudd, Hannah, Schwermer, Heike, Seixas, Sónia, Steins, Nathalie, Tenbrink, Talya, Torreele, Els, Valeiras, Julio, Vallerani, Matilde, Wood, Peter
Tipo de documento: Relatório
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/15354
Resumo: The objective of the Workshop on accounting for fishers and other stakeholders’ perceptions of the dynamics of fish stocks in ICES advice (WKAFPA) was to identify where and how stake- holder information could be incorporated in the ICES fisheries advice process. It adopted an operational definition of the concept of perception, where perceptions result from observations, interpreted in light of experience, that can be supported by data, information and knowledge to generate evidence about them. Stakeholder information can be either structured (e.g. routinely collected information in a standardized format) or unstructured (e.g. experiential information) and either of those can inform decisions made during the production of ICES advice. Most notably, the group identified there was a need to engage with stakeholders earlier in the process, i.e. before benchmarks meetings take place and before preliminary assessment results are used as the basis to predict total allowable catches for upcoming advice (Figure 4.2). It was therefore recommended to include in the ICES process the organisation of pre-bench- mark/roadmap workshops where science and data needs of upcoming benchmarks can be iden- tified, followed by making arrangements how scientists and stakeholders can collaborate to ac- cess, prepare for use (where relevant) and document the structured and unstructured infor- mation well ahead of the benchmark meetings. It was also recommended to organise ‘sense-checking’ sessions with stakeholders when prelim- inary assessments are available but not yet used as the basis for advisory production. This would allow stakeholders and assessment scientists to verify available knowledge and data against stock perceptions and provide additional considerations relevant for the production of TAC ad- vice. Next to these two additional activities, it is recommended that communication on differ- ences in stakeholder perception or data derived perceptions are communicated within the ICES assessment reports as well as in the ICES advice in a transparent manner. Not only should dif- ferences or similarities be documented and communicated, in those cases where there are differ- ences in perception between ICES stock assessments and stakeholders, a working group, external to the assessment working groups, should evaluate these differences and describe whether these differences can be logically explained or require further investigation. This outcome of this pro- cess may potentially lead to new data collection or additional analyses suitable for input to benchmarks. Essential in this entire process is making sure the same language is spoken between scientists and stakeholders, that there are clear and transparent processes in place on how to deal with stakeholder information and communicate clearly how this information is used in the prepara- tion of ICES advice.
id RCAP_2cc184c7302bcd78fda8ed22f836a28e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorioaberto.uab.pt:10400.2/15354
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Workshop on accounting for fishers and other stakeholders’ perceptions of the dynamics of fish stocks in ICES advice (WKAFPA)Stakeholder perceptionFishers perceptionFish stocksStakeholderICES AdviceThe objective of the Workshop on accounting for fishers and other stakeholders’ perceptions of the dynamics of fish stocks in ICES advice (WKAFPA) was to identify where and how stake- holder information could be incorporated in the ICES fisheries advice process. It adopted an operational definition of the concept of perception, where perceptions result from observations, interpreted in light of experience, that can be supported by data, information and knowledge to generate evidence about them. Stakeholder information can be either structured (e.g. routinely collected information in a standardized format) or unstructured (e.g. experiential information) and either of those can inform decisions made during the production of ICES advice. Most notably, the group identified there was a need to engage with stakeholders earlier in the process, i.e. before benchmarks meetings take place and before preliminary assessment results are used as the basis to predict total allowable catches for upcoming advice (Figure 4.2). It was therefore recommended to include in the ICES process the organisation of pre-bench- mark/roadmap workshops where science and data needs of upcoming benchmarks can be iden- tified, followed by making arrangements how scientists and stakeholders can collaborate to ac- cess, prepare for use (where relevant) and document the structured and unstructured infor- mation well ahead of the benchmark meetings. It was also recommended to organise ‘sense-checking’ sessions with stakeholders when prelim- inary assessments are available but not yet used as the basis for advisory production. This would allow stakeholders and assessment scientists to verify available knowledge and data against stock perceptions and provide additional considerations relevant for the production of TAC ad- vice. Next to these two additional activities, it is recommended that communication on differ- ences in stakeholder perception or data derived perceptions are communicated within the ICES assessment reports as well as in the ICES advice in a transparent manner. Not only should dif- ferences or similarities be documented and communicated, in those cases where there are differ- ences in perception between ICES stock assessments and stakeholders, a working group, external to the assessment working groups, should evaluate these differences and describe whether these differences can be logically explained or require further investigation. This outcome of this pro- cess may potentially lead to new data collection or additional analyses suitable for input to benchmarks. Essential in this entire process is making sure the same language is spoken between scientists and stakeholders, that there are clear and transparent processes in place on how to deal with stakeholder information and communicate clearly how this information is used in the prepara- tion of ICES advice.ICESRepositório AbertoAngu, ChevonneBalestri, ElenaBallesteros, MartaBloecker, AlexandraCadrin, SteveChristensen, HelleCurtis, DavidDandy, RufusEvan, DerekFarrell, EdwardGamaza, MariaGollock, MatthewHaase, StefanieHintzen, NielsJones, AndrewKorsbrekke, KnutLibun- gan, Lisa AnneLuedemann, KarinMacdonald, PaulMackinson, StevenMerce, AnnaMurphy, PatrickNapier, IanPastoors, MartinPeixoto, UalersonRasmussen, JensReedtz Sparrevohn, ClausRoux, Marie-JulieRudd, HannahSchwermer, HeikeSeixas, SóniaSteins, NathalieTenbrink, TalyaTorreele, ElsValeiras, JulioVallerani, MatildeWood, Peter2024-01-05T16:38:06Z2023-12-202023-12-20T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/reportapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/15354engICES. 2023. Workshop on accounting for fishers and other stakeholders’ perceptions of the dynamics of fish stocks in ICES advice (WKAFPA). ICES Scientific Reports. 5:104. 28 pp. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.2486608810.17895/ices.pub.24866088info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-07T01:46:29Zoai:repositorioaberto.uab.pt:10400.2/15354Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:30:38.667621Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Workshop on accounting for fishers and other stakeholders’ perceptions of the dynamics of fish stocks in ICES advice (WKAFPA)
title Workshop on accounting for fishers and other stakeholders’ perceptions of the dynamics of fish stocks in ICES advice (WKAFPA)
spellingShingle Workshop on accounting for fishers and other stakeholders’ perceptions of the dynamics of fish stocks in ICES advice (WKAFPA)
Angu, Chevonne
Stakeholder perception
Fishers perception
Fish stocks
Stakeholder
ICES Advice
title_short Workshop on accounting for fishers and other stakeholders’ perceptions of the dynamics of fish stocks in ICES advice (WKAFPA)
title_full Workshop on accounting for fishers and other stakeholders’ perceptions of the dynamics of fish stocks in ICES advice (WKAFPA)
title_fullStr Workshop on accounting for fishers and other stakeholders’ perceptions of the dynamics of fish stocks in ICES advice (WKAFPA)
title_full_unstemmed Workshop on accounting for fishers and other stakeholders’ perceptions of the dynamics of fish stocks in ICES advice (WKAFPA)
title_sort Workshop on accounting for fishers and other stakeholders’ perceptions of the dynamics of fish stocks in ICES advice (WKAFPA)
author Angu, Chevonne
author_facet Angu, Chevonne
Balestri, Elena
Ballesteros, Marta
Bloecker, Alexandra
Cadrin, Steve
Christensen, Helle
Curtis, David
Dandy, Rufus
Evan, Derek
Farrell, Edward
Gamaza, Maria
Gollock, Matthew
Haase, Stefanie
Hintzen, Niels
Jones, Andrew
Korsbrekke, Knut
Libun- gan, Lisa Anne
Luedemann, Karin
Macdonald, Paul
Mackinson, Steven
Merce, Anna
Murphy, Patrick
Napier, Ian
Pastoors, Martin
Peixoto, Ualerson
Rasmussen, Jens
Reedtz Sparrevohn, Claus
Roux, Marie-Julie
Rudd, Hannah
Schwermer, Heike
Seixas, Sónia
Steins, Nathalie
Tenbrink, Talya
Torreele, Els
Valeiras, Julio
Vallerani, Matilde
Wood, Peter
author_role author
author2 Balestri, Elena
Ballesteros, Marta
Bloecker, Alexandra
Cadrin, Steve
Christensen, Helle
Curtis, David
Dandy, Rufus
Evan, Derek
Farrell, Edward
Gamaza, Maria
Gollock, Matthew
Haase, Stefanie
Hintzen, Niels
Jones, Andrew
Korsbrekke, Knut
Libun- gan, Lisa Anne
Luedemann, Karin
Macdonald, Paul
Mackinson, Steven
Merce, Anna
Murphy, Patrick
Napier, Ian
Pastoors, Martin
Peixoto, Ualerson
Rasmussen, Jens
Reedtz Sparrevohn, Claus
Roux, Marie-Julie
Rudd, Hannah
Schwermer, Heike
Seixas, Sónia
Steins, Nathalie
Tenbrink, Talya
Torreele, Els
Valeiras, Julio
Vallerani, Matilde
Wood, Peter
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Aberto
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Angu, Chevonne
Balestri, Elena
Ballesteros, Marta
Bloecker, Alexandra
Cadrin, Steve
Christensen, Helle
Curtis, David
Dandy, Rufus
Evan, Derek
Farrell, Edward
Gamaza, Maria
Gollock, Matthew
Haase, Stefanie
Hintzen, Niels
Jones, Andrew
Korsbrekke, Knut
Libun- gan, Lisa Anne
Luedemann, Karin
Macdonald, Paul
Mackinson, Steven
Merce, Anna
Murphy, Patrick
Napier, Ian
Pastoors, Martin
Peixoto, Ualerson
Rasmussen, Jens
Reedtz Sparrevohn, Claus
Roux, Marie-Julie
Rudd, Hannah
Schwermer, Heike
Seixas, Sónia
Steins, Nathalie
Tenbrink, Talya
Torreele, Els
Valeiras, Julio
Vallerani, Matilde
Wood, Peter
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Stakeholder perception
Fishers perception
Fish stocks
Stakeholder
ICES Advice
topic Stakeholder perception
Fishers perception
Fish stocks
Stakeholder
ICES Advice
description The objective of the Workshop on accounting for fishers and other stakeholders’ perceptions of the dynamics of fish stocks in ICES advice (WKAFPA) was to identify where and how stake- holder information could be incorporated in the ICES fisheries advice process. It adopted an operational definition of the concept of perception, where perceptions result from observations, interpreted in light of experience, that can be supported by data, information and knowledge to generate evidence about them. Stakeholder information can be either structured (e.g. routinely collected information in a standardized format) or unstructured (e.g. experiential information) and either of those can inform decisions made during the production of ICES advice. Most notably, the group identified there was a need to engage with stakeholders earlier in the process, i.e. before benchmarks meetings take place and before preliminary assessment results are used as the basis to predict total allowable catches for upcoming advice (Figure 4.2). It was therefore recommended to include in the ICES process the organisation of pre-bench- mark/roadmap workshops where science and data needs of upcoming benchmarks can be iden- tified, followed by making arrangements how scientists and stakeholders can collaborate to ac- cess, prepare for use (where relevant) and document the structured and unstructured infor- mation well ahead of the benchmark meetings. It was also recommended to organise ‘sense-checking’ sessions with stakeholders when prelim- inary assessments are available but not yet used as the basis for advisory production. This would allow stakeholders and assessment scientists to verify available knowledge and data against stock perceptions and provide additional considerations relevant for the production of TAC ad- vice. Next to these two additional activities, it is recommended that communication on differ- ences in stakeholder perception or data derived perceptions are communicated within the ICES assessment reports as well as in the ICES advice in a transparent manner. Not only should dif- ferences or similarities be documented and communicated, in those cases where there are differ- ences in perception between ICES stock assessments and stakeholders, a working group, external to the assessment working groups, should evaluate these differences and describe whether these differences can be logically explained or require further investigation. This outcome of this pro- cess may potentially lead to new data collection or additional analyses suitable for input to benchmarks. Essential in this entire process is making sure the same language is spoken between scientists and stakeholders, that there are clear and transparent processes in place on how to deal with stakeholder information and communicate clearly how this information is used in the prepara- tion of ICES advice.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-20
2023-12-20T00:00:00Z
2024-01-05T16:38:06Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/report
format report
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/15354
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/15354
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv ICES. 2023. Workshop on accounting for fishers and other stakeholders’ perceptions of the dynamics of fish stocks in ICES advice (WKAFPA). ICES Scientific Reports. 5:104. 28 pp. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.24866088
10.17895/ices.pub.24866088
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ICES
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ICES
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136788720123904