Adult asthma scores—development and validation of multivariable scores to identify asthma in surveys

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sá-Sousa, Ana
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Pereira, Ana Margarida, Almeida, Rute, Araújo, Luís, Couto, Mariana, Jacinto, Tiago, Freitas, Alberto, Bousquet, Jean, Fonseca, João A.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/13997
Resumo: One of the questions in epidemiology is the identification of adult asthma in studies. To develop and validate multivariable scores for adult asthma identification in epidemiological studies and to explore cutoffs to rule in/rule out asthma, compared with asthma diagnosed by a physician after clinical examination and diagnostic tests, blinded to the self-administered questions. We analyzed data (n = 711 adults) from a nationwide population-based study. The predictors were self-administered questions identified in a literature review (the Adult Asthma Epidemiological Score [A2 score]) and from the Global Allergy and Asthma Network of Excellence (GA2LEN) questionnaire (the GA2LEN Asthma Epidemiological Score [GA2LEN score]). Scores were developed using exploratory factor analysis. Internal consistency, discriminative power, and diagnostic accuracy were assessed. The A2 score comprises 8 questions (including “Did a physician confirm you had asthma?”) and the GA2LEN score comprises 6 questions (including “Have you ever had asthma?”). Both had high Cronbach α (0.89 and 0.85, respectively, for the A2 score and the GA2LEN score) and good area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (90.4% and 89.0%). The scoring is the sum of positive answers. Asthma is present (rule in) for scores of 4 or more (specificity, 99.2%; PPV, 93.3% and 91.7%; accuracy, 89.4% and 87.4%, respectively, for the A2 score and the GA2LEN score). Asthma is excluded (rule out) for A2 scores of 0 to 1 and a GA2LEN score of 0 (sensitivity, 93.1%; NPV, 98.2% and 98.0%; accuracy 89.4% and 82.8%, respectively, for the A2 score and the GA2LEN score). These practical scores can be used to rule in/rule out asthma in epidemiological studies and clinical screening/triage settings. They may help physicians in primary care or other specialties to screen patients with asthma using a simple score with a high level of discrimination and to identify the best candidates to be referred for a diagnostic workup. Moreover, their use may contribute to reducing the inconsistencies of operational definitions of asthma across studies and surveys.
id RCAP_2cdc65c32db89a340b7ed3c80daed087
oai_identifier_str oai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/13997
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Adult asthma scores—development and validation of multivariable scores to identify asthma in surveysAsthmaEpidemiologyValidation studiesFactor analysisQuestionnaire surveyOne of the questions in epidemiology is the identification of adult asthma in studies. To develop and validate multivariable scores for adult asthma identification in epidemiological studies and to explore cutoffs to rule in/rule out asthma, compared with asthma diagnosed by a physician after clinical examination and diagnostic tests, blinded to the self-administered questions. We analyzed data (n = 711 adults) from a nationwide population-based study. The predictors were self-administered questions identified in a literature review (the Adult Asthma Epidemiological Score [A2 score]) and from the Global Allergy and Asthma Network of Excellence (GA2LEN) questionnaire (the GA2LEN Asthma Epidemiological Score [GA2LEN score]). Scores were developed using exploratory factor analysis. Internal consistency, discriminative power, and diagnostic accuracy were assessed. The A2 score comprises 8 questions (including “Did a physician confirm you had asthma?”) and the GA2LEN score comprises 6 questions (including “Have you ever had asthma?”). Both had high Cronbach α (0.89 and 0.85, respectively, for the A2 score and the GA2LEN score) and good area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (90.4% and 89.0%). The scoring is the sum of positive answers. Asthma is present (rule in) for scores of 4 or more (specificity, 99.2%; PPV, 93.3% and 91.7%; accuracy, 89.4% and 87.4%, respectively, for the A2 score and the GA2LEN score). Asthma is excluded (rule out) for A2 scores of 0 to 1 and a GA2LEN score of 0 (sensitivity, 93.1%; NPV, 98.2% and 98.0%; accuracy 89.4% and 82.8%, respectively, for the A2 score and the GA2LEN score). These practical scores can be used to rule in/rule out asthma in epidemiological studies and clinical screening/triage settings. They may help physicians in primary care or other specialties to screen patients with asthma using a simple score with a high level of discrimination and to identify the best candidates to be referred for a diagnostic workup. Moreover, their use may contribute to reducing the inconsistencies of operational definitions of asthma across studies and surveys.ElsevierRepositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico do PortoSá-Sousa, AnaPereira, Ana MargaridaAlmeida, RuteAraújo, LuísCouto, MarianaJacinto, TiagoFreitas, AlbertoBousquet, JeanFonseca, João A.2020-02-02T01:30:31Z2019-012019-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/13997engSá-Sousa, A., Pereira, A. M., Almeida, R., Araújo, L., Couto, M., Jacinto, T., Freitas, A., Bousquet, J., & Fonseca, J. A. (2019). Adult Asthma Scores—Development and Validation of Multivariable Scores to Identify Asthma in Surveys. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, 7(1), 183-190.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2018.06.02410.1016/j.jaip.2018.06.024info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-12-20T01:53:26Zoai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/13997Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:33:50.887310Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Adult asthma scores—development and validation of multivariable scores to identify asthma in surveys
title Adult asthma scores—development and validation of multivariable scores to identify asthma in surveys
spellingShingle Adult asthma scores—development and validation of multivariable scores to identify asthma in surveys
Sá-Sousa, Ana
Asthma
Epidemiology
Validation studies
Factor analysis
Questionnaire survey
title_short Adult asthma scores—development and validation of multivariable scores to identify asthma in surveys
title_full Adult asthma scores—development and validation of multivariable scores to identify asthma in surveys
title_fullStr Adult asthma scores—development and validation of multivariable scores to identify asthma in surveys
title_full_unstemmed Adult asthma scores—development and validation of multivariable scores to identify asthma in surveys
title_sort Adult asthma scores—development and validation of multivariable scores to identify asthma in surveys
author Sá-Sousa, Ana
author_facet Sá-Sousa, Ana
Pereira, Ana Margarida
Almeida, Rute
Araújo, Luís
Couto, Mariana
Jacinto, Tiago
Freitas, Alberto
Bousquet, Jean
Fonseca, João A.
author_role author
author2 Pereira, Ana Margarida
Almeida, Rute
Araújo, Luís
Couto, Mariana
Jacinto, Tiago
Freitas, Alberto
Bousquet, Jean
Fonseca, João A.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico do Porto
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sá-Sousa, Ana
Pereira, Ana Margarida
Almeida, Rute
Araújo, Luís
Couto, Mariana
Jacinto, Tiago
Freitas, Alberto
Bousquet, Jean
Fonseca, João A.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Asthma
Epidemiology
Validation studies
Factor analysis
Questionnaire survey
topic Asthma
Epidemiology
Validation studies
Factor analysis
Questionnaire survey
description One of the questions in epidemiology is the identification of adult asthma in studies. To develop and validate multivariable scores for adult asthma identification in epidemiological studies and to explore cutoffs to rule in/rule out asthma, compared with asthma diagnosed by a physician after clinical examination and diagnostic tests, blinded to the self-administered questions. We analyzed data (n = 711 adults) from a nationwide population-based study. The predictors were self-administered questions identified in a literature review (the Adult Asthma Epidemiological Score [A2 score]) and from the Global Allergy and Asthma Network of Excellence (GA2LEN) questionnaire (the GA2LEN Asthma Epidemiological Score [GA2LEN score]). Scores were developed using exploratory factor analysis. Internal consistency, discriminative power, and diagnostic accuracy were assessed. The A2 score comprises 8 questions (including “Did a physician confirm you had asthma?”) and the GA2LEN score comprises 6 questions (including “Have you ever had asthma?”). Both had high Cronbach α (0.89 and 0.85, respectively, for the A2 score and the GA2LEN score) and good area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (90.4% and 89.0%). The scoring is the sum of positive answers. Asthma is present (rule in) for scores of 4 or more (specificity, 99.2%; PPV, 93.3% and 91.7%; accuracy, 89.4% and 87.4%, respectively, for the A2 score and the GA2LEN score). Asthma is excluded (rule out) for A2 scores of 0 to 1 and a GA2LEN score of 0 (sensitivity, 93.1%; NPV, 98.2% and 98.0%; accuracy 89.4% and 82.8%, respectively, for the A2 score and the GA2LEN score). These practical scores can be used to rule in/rule out asthma in epidemiological studies and clinical screening/triage settings. They may help physicians in primary care or other specialties to screen patients with asthma using a simple score with a high level of discrimination and to identify the best candidates to be referred for a diagnostic workup. Moreover, their use may contribute to reducing the inconsistencies of operational definitions of asthma across studies and surveys.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
2020-02-02T01:30:31Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/13997
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/13997
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Sá-Sousa, A., Pereira, A. M., Almeida, R., Araújo, L., Couto, M., Jacinto, T., Freitas, A., Bousquet, J., & Fonseca, J. A. (2019). Adult Asthma Scores—Development and Validation of Multivariable Scores to Identify Asthma in Surveys. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, 7(1), 183-190.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2018.06.024
10.1016/j.jaip.2018.06.024
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131430433849344