Democratization in Africa: the development condition revisited
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10174/28207 https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21814/perspectivas.2506 |
Resumo: | In the middle of the twentieth century S.M. Lipset sustained that various indicators of economic development were higher in democratic countries than in authoritarian ones, suggesting that development was a condition to democracy. More recently, though, several authors have shown that there is no strong empirical evidence confirming development as a condition to democracy, suggesting in turn that the economic is not as important in democratization as it seemed in the 1950s. Despite this fact, there are some clues that indicate that economic factors do play an important role in democratization, but in a way different than that proposed by Lipset. In this article a revision of literature on some economic obstacles to democratization in Africa is carried out, its main conclusion being that underdevelopment decisively contributes to the difficulties many African countries experience in democratizing and consolidating democracy. One should not mistake underdevelopment with un-development though, the latter being the mere absence or delay in development and the former a specific supporting role given to developing countries within the global development process. The article’s general conclusion, therefore, is that democratic development is not a question of getting richer, i.e. intensifying the development model, as much as of reforming this same model. |
id |
RCAP_2d15d04dacf3310cc59d7da840b260e8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/28207 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Democratization in Africa: the development condition revisitedDemocratizationAfricaDevelopmentUnderdevelopmentIn the middle of the twentieth century S.M. Lipset sustained that various indicators of economic development were higher in democratic countries than in authoritarian ones, suggesting that development was a condition to democracy. More recently, though, several authors have shown that there is no strong empirical evidence confirming development as a condition to democracy, suggesting in turn that the economic is not as important in democratization as it seemed in the 1950s. Despite this fact, there are some clues that indicate that economic factors do play an important role in democratization, but in a way different than that proposed by Lipset. In this article a revision of literature on some economic obstacles to democratization in Africa is carried out, its main conclusion being that underdevelopment decisively contributes to the difficulties many African countries experience in democratizing and consolidating democracy. One should not mistake underdevelopment with un-development though, the latter being the mere absence or delay in development and the former a specific supporting role given to developing countries within the global development process. The article’s general conclusion, therefore, is that democratic development is not a question of getting richer, i.e. intensifying the development model, as much as of reforming this same model.Perspectivas Portuguese Journal of Political Science2020-10-23T11:30:22Z2020-10-232020-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/28207http://hdl.handle.net/10174/28207https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21814/perspectivas.2506engBRANCO, Manuel (2020) "Democratization in Africa: The Development Condition Revisited", Perspectivas, Portuguese Journal of Political Science and International Relations, vol 22: pp. 39-49.mbranco@uevora.pt650Branco, Manuelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T19:24:23Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/28207Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:18:09.191451Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Democratization in Africa: the development condition revisited |
title |
Democratization in Africa: the development condition revisited |
spellingShingle |
Democratization in Africa: the development condition revisited Branco, Manuel Democratization Africa Development Underdevelopment |
title_short |
Democratization in Africa: the development condition revisited |
title_full |
Democratization in Africa: the development condition revisited |
title_fullStr |
Democratization in Africa: the development condition revisited |
title_full_unstemmed |
Democratization in Africa: the development condition revisited |
title_sort |
Democratization in Africa: the development condition revisited |
author |
Branco, Manuel |
author_facet |
Branco, Manuel |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Branco, Manuel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Democratization Africa Development Underdevelopment |
topic |
Democratization Africa Development Underdevelopment |
description |
In the middle of the twentieth century S.M. Lipset sustained that various indicators of economic development were higher in democratic countries than in authoritarian ones, suggesting that development was a condition to democracy. More recently, though, several authors have shown that there is no strong empirical evidence confirming development as a condition to democracy, suggesting in turn that the economic is not as important in democratization as it seemed in the 1950s. Despite this fact, there are some clues that indicate that economic factors do play an important role in democratization, but in a way different than that proposed by Lipset. In this article a revision of literature on some economic obstacles to democratization in Africa is carried out, its main conclusion being that underdevelopment decisively contributes to the difficulties many African countries experience in democratizing and consolidating democracy. One should not mistake underdevelopment with un-development though, the latter being the mere absence or delay in development and the former a specific supporting role given to developing countries within the global development process. The article’s general conclusion, therefore, is that democratic development is not a question of getting richer, i.e. intensifying the development model, as much as of reforming this same model. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-10-23T11:30:22Z 2020-10-23 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/28207 http://hdl.handle.net/10174/28207 https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21814/perspectivas.2506 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/28207 https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21814/perspectivas.2506 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
BRANCO, Manuel (2020) "Democratization in Africa: The Development Condition Revisited", Perspectivas, Portuguese Journal of Political Science and International Relations, vol 22: pp. 39-49. mbranco@uevora.pt 650 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Perspectivas Portuguese Journal of Political Science |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Perspectivas Portuguese Journal of Political Science |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136663486595072 |